, 40:457 | Cite as

Assessing the Impacts of Establishing MPAs on Fishermen and Fish Merchants: The Case of Lyme Bay, UK

  • Stephen C. Mangi
  • Lynda D. Rodwell
  • Caroline Hattam


Shortly after the implementation of a marine protected area (MPA) in Lyme Bay in 2008, inside which scallop dredging and bottom trawling is prohibited, a socio-economic impact assessment was initiated. This article presents the initial findings from this study. The aim was to understand the costs and benefits to fishermen and fish merchants of establishing the MPA. These were assessed using a combination of primary and secondary data. The results indicate that the impacts of the closure differ according to the gear type and the fishing location used by the fishermen. Static gear fishermen who fish inside the closed area have seen changes in terms of increased fishing effort, mostly because they have been able to increase the number of crab and whelk pots they deploy. The effects of the closure on static gear fishermen who fish outside the closed area has been reported in terms of increased conflicts with towed gear fishermen who now fish regularly in their traditional grounds. Fishermen using towed gear on the other hand have been impacted through displacement effects as they have been forced to look for other fishing grounds outside the closed area. Most fish merchants and processors initially claimed that they were heavily impacted by the closure but when they were interviewed 1 year after the closure they suggested a more stable picture. Preliminary analyses of landings data indicate that the introduction of the MPA has so far had minimal impacts on the average incomes and financial profits of fishermen and fish merchants. This conclusion, however, reflects a short-term view as the impacts of the closure of Lyme Bay are likely to be felt for a long time to come.


Costs and benefits Conservation-people conflicts Perceptions Resource users Socio-economics 



This research is being funded by the UK Department for Food, Environment and Rural Affairs (Defra) and Natural England. The authors would like to thank the fishermen and fish merchants in Lyme Bay for their cooperation in undertaking this study.


  1. Anderson, J., H. Curtis, R. Boyle, and K. Graham. 2007. 2005 Economic survey of the UK Fishing Fleet short report. Edinburgh: Sea Fish Industry Authority.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, T. 2008. Impact assessment of measures to protect marine biodiversity in Lyme Bay. Report to Defra: 57 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Beukers-Stewart, B.D., B.J. Vause, M.W.J. Mosley, H.L. Rossetti, and A.R. Brand. 2005. Benefits of closed area protection for a population of scallops. Marine Ecology Progress Series 298: 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blyth, R., M. Kaiser, G. Edwards-Jones, and P. Hart. 2002. Voluntary management in an inshore fishery has conservation benefits. Environmental Conservation 29: 493–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter, D.W. 2003. Protected areas in marine resource management: another look at the economics and research issues. Ocean and Coastal Management 46: 439–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Currie, D.R., and G.D. Parry. 1996. Effects of scallop dredging on a soft sediment community: a large-scale experimental study. Marine Ecology Progress Series 134: 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Curtis, H., and J. Anderson. 2008. Lyme Bay proposed MPA: Indications of social and economic impacts. Edinburgh: Sea Fish Industry Authority, Submission for Marine and Fisheries Agency.Google Scholar
  8. Defra. 2008. Explanatory memorandum to the Lyme Bay designated area. Fishing Restrictions Order 2008 No. 1584. London: Defra.Google Scholar
  9. DSFC. 2008. Devon Sea Fisheries Committee response to consultation on marine special areas of conservation (SACs) and special protection areas (SPAs) in English, Welsh and offshore waters around the UK: social and economic impacts: 13 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Devon Wildlife Trust (DWT). 2007. Lyme bay reefs: A 16 year search for sustainability. UK: Exeter.Google Scholar
  11. English Nature 2006. 2006. Lyme bay reefs dossier from English nature to Defra. Peterborough, UK: Defra.Google Scholar
  12. Garcia-Charton, J.A., I.D. Willians, A. Perez Ruzafa, M. Milazzo, R. Chemello, C. Marcos, et al. 2000. Evaluating the ecological effects of Southern European marine-protected areas: habitat, scale and the natural variability of ecosystems. Environmental Conservation 27: 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gell, F.R., and C.M. Roberts. 2003. Benefits beyond boundaries: the fishery effects of marine reserves. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18: 448–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goni, R., N.V.C. Polunin, and S. Planes. 2000. The Mediterranean: Marine-protected areas and the recovery of a large marine ecosystem. Environmental Conservation 27: 95–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hirst, J.A., and M.J. Attrill. 2008. Small is beautiful: An inverted view of habitat fragmentation in seagrass beds. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 78: 811–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hiscock, K., and M. Breckles. 2007. Marine biodiversity hotspots in the UK: their identification and protection. Godalming: WWF-UK.Google Scholar
  17. Hough, J.L. 1988. Obstacles to effective management of conflicts between national parks and surrounding human communities in developing countries. Environmental Conservation 15: 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jackson, A. 2007. Lithothamnion Corallioides Maerl. Marine Life information network: biology and sensitivity key information sub-programme. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, P.J.S., and J. Burgess. 2005. Building partnership capacity for the collaborative management of marine protected areas in the UK: a preliminary analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 77: 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, P.J.S. 1999. Marine nature reserves in Britain: past lessons, current status and future issues. Marine Policy 23: 375–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, P.J.S. 2001. Marine protected area strategies: Issues, divergences and the search for middle ground. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 11: 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones, P.J.S. 2006. Collective action problems posed by no-take zones. Marine Policy 30: 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones, P.J.S. 2008. Fishing industry and related perspectives on the issues raised by no-take marine protected area proposals. Marine Policy 32: 749–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones, P.J.S. 2009. Equity, justice and power issues raised by no-take marine protected area proposals. Marine Policy 33: 759–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Joyce, R. 1989. Marine reserves: Spreading the idea. Forest and Bird 20: 13–15.Google Scholar
  26. Kaiser, M.J., K.R. Clarke, H. Hinz, M.C.V. Austen, P.J. Somerfield, and I. Karakassis. 2006. Global analysis of response and recovery of benthic biota to fishing. Marine Ecology Progress Series 311: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaiser, M.J., J.S. Collie, S.J. Hall, S. Jennings, and I.R. Poiner. 2002. Modification of marine habitats by trawling activities: prognosis and solutions. Fish and Fisheries 3: 114–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaiser, M.J., K. Ramsay, C.A. Richardson, F.E. Spence, and A.R. Brand. 2000. Chronic fishing disturbance has changed shelf sea benthic community structure. The Journal of Animal Ecology 69: 494–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marine and Coastal Access Act. 2009. UK Government Public Acts 2009.Google Scholar
  30. McClanahan, T.R., and S. Mangi. 2000. Spillover of exploitable fishes from a marine park and its effect on the adjacent fishery. Ecological Applications 10: 1792–1805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McClanahan, T.R., and B. Kaunda-Arara. 1996. Fishery recovery in a coral-reef marine park and its effect on the adjacent fishery. Conservation Biology 10: 1187–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McConnaughey, R.A., K.L. Mier, and C.B. Dew. 2000. An examination of chronic trawling effects on soft-bottom benthos of the eastern Bering Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57: 1377–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller, R.J., and W. Hunte. 2000. Effective area fished by Antillean fish traps. Bulletin of Marine Science 40: 484–493.Google Scholar
  34. Pomeroy, R.S., J.E. Parks, and L.M. Watson. 2004. How is your MPA doing? A guidebook of natural and social indicators for evaluating marine protected are management effectiveness. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ravetz, J.R. 1999. What is post-normal science? Futures 31: 647–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rees, S.E., M.J. Attrill, M.C. Austen, S.C. Mangi, J.P. Richards, and L.D. Rodwell. 2010a. Is there a win–win scenario for marine nature conservation? A case study of Lyme Bay, England. Ocean and Coastal Management 53: 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rees, S.E., L.D. Rodwell, M.J. Attrill, M.C. Austen, and S.C. Mangi. 2010b. The value of marine biodiversity to the leisure and recreation industry and its application to marine spatial planning. Marine Policy 34: 868–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Roberts, C.M., J.P. Hawkins, and F.R. Gell. 2005. The role of marine reserves in achieving sustainable fisheries. Philosophic Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sanchirico, J.N., K.A. Cochran, and P.M. Emerson. 2002. Marine protected areas: Economic and social implications. Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper, 02-26.Google Scholar
  40. Stevens, T., L. Rodwell, K. Beaumont, T. Lewis, C. Smith, and K. Stehfest. 2007. Surveys for marine spatial planning in Lyme Bay. University of Plymouth: Report to Devon Wildlife Trust by the Marine Institute.Google Scholar
  41. Tillin, H.M., J.G. Hiddink, S. Jennings, and M.J. Kaiser. 2006. Chronic bottom trawling alters the functional composition of benthic invertebrate communities on a sea-basin scale. Marine Ecology Progress Series 318: 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tylor, N., and B. Buckenham. 2003. Social impacts of marine reserves in New Zealand. Science for Conservation 217. Auckland: New Zealand Department of Conservation.Google Scholar
  43. Watling, L., and E.A. Norse. 1998. Disturbance of the seabed by mobile fishing gear: A comparison to forest clearcutting. Conservation Biology 12: 1180–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen C. Mangi
    • 1
  • Lynda D. Rodwell
    • 2
  • Caroline Hattam
    • 1
  1. 1.Plymouth Marine LaboratoryThe Hoe, PlymouthUK
  2. 2.Centre for Marine and Coastal Policy Research, Marine InstituteUniversity of PlymouthPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations