Advertisement

AMBIO

, Volume 40, Issue 5, pp 540–543 | Cite as

Soaring Extinction Threats to Endemic Plants in Brazilian Metal-Rich Regions

  • Claudia M. Jacobi
  • Flávio F. do Carmo
  • Iara C. de Campos
Synopsis

Introduction

Environmental degradation due to mining activities is pervasive in most mineral-rich countries and has been given little attention by the authorities. Surface mining frequently targets very specific and evolutionary unique ecosystems, usually on mountaintops, and is characterized by high environmental impact and irreversibility (Jacobi and do Carmo 2008; Gibson et al. 2010). Recently, the negative impacts of coal surface mining were exposed in relation to ecosystem degradation and damages to human health, underlining the need to improve regulatory measures to mitigate them (Palmer et al. 2010). The loss of plant species associated with mineral-rich areas should be added to the list of ecologic and genetic damages recurrently derived from surface-mining activities.

Convention on Biological Diversity Targets at Risk

The conservation of metal-rich ecosystems represents a major challenge to the signatories of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). This seminal global...

Keywords

Protected Area Protected Area Network Opencast Mining Rare Plant Species Metalliferous Region 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by the Foundation for Research Support of Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG, grant APQ387/08) and the Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq, grant 479834/2008-3). The contents of this article, however, do not necessarily reflect the views of these agencies, and no official endorsement should be inferred.

References

  1. Brady, K.U., A.R. Kruckeberg, and H.D. Bradshaw Jr. 2005. Evolutionary ecology of plant adaptation to serpentine soils. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36: 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brazilian Mining Association (IBRAM). 2009. Information and analyses of the Brazilian Mining Economy. http://www.ibram.org (in Portuguese).
  3. Brazilian Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME). 2010. National mining plan, 2030. Brasilia: MME (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  4. Brazilian Ministry of the Environment (MMA). 2009. Pillars for the financial sustainability of the national protected areas system. Brasilia: MMA (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  5. Brazilian Ministry of the Environment (MMA). 2010. National register of protected areas. http://www.ibama.gov.br/siucweb (in Portuguese).
  6. Finger, A., S. Stolton, and N. Dudley, ed. 1999. Metals from the forests: mining and forest degradation. Arborvitae, special issue. Gland, Switzerland: World Wide Fund for Nature & International Union for Conservation of Nature.Google Scholar
  7. Gibson, N., D.J. Coates, and K.R. Thiele. 2007. Taxonomic research and the conservation status of flora in the Yilgarn Banded Iron Formation ranges. Nuytsia 17: 1–12.Google Scholar
  8. Gibson, N., C.J. Yates, and R. Dillon. 2010. Plant communities of the ironstone ranges of South Western Australia: Hotspots for plant diversity and mineral deposits. Biodiversity and Conservation 19: 3951–3962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ginocchio, R., and A.J.M. Baker. 2004. Metallophytes in Latin America: a remarkable biological and genetic resource scarcely known and studied in the region. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 77: 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giulietti, A.M., A. Rapini, M.J.G. Andrade, L.P. Queiroz, and J.M.C. Silva, ed. 2009. Rare plants of Brazil. Belo Horizonte: Conservation International (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  11. Giulietti, A.M., R.M. Harley, L.P. de Queiroz, M.G.L. Wanderley, and C. van den Berg. 2005. Biodiversity and conservation of plants in Brazil. Conservation Biology 19: 632–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacobi, C.M., and F.F. do Carmo. 2008. The contribution of ironstone outcrops to plant diversity in the Iron Quadrangle, a threatened Brazilian landscape. Ambio 37: 324–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. National Department of Mineral Production (DNPM). 2006. Mineral summary 2006. Brasilia: DNPM.Google Scholar
  14. National Department of Mineral Production (DNPM). 2009. Brazilian mineral economy. Brasilia: DNPM (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  15. National Department of Mineral Production (DNPM). 2010. Mineral summary. Brasilia: DNPM (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  16. Palmer, M.A., E.S. Bernhardt, W.H. Schlesinger, K.N. Eshleman, E. Foufoula-Georgiou, M.S. Hendryx, A.D. Lemly, G.E. Likens, et al. 2010. Mountaintop mining consequences. Science 327: 148–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reeves, R., A. Baker, T. Becquer, G. Echevarria, and Z. Miranda. 2007. The flora and biogeochemistry of the ultramafic soils of Goiás state, Brazil. Plant and Soil 293: 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Regalado, A. 2010. Brazilian Science: Riding a gusher. Science 330: 1306–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Silva, M. 2005. The Brazilian protected areas program. Conservation Biology 19: 608–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Whiting, S.N., R.D. Reeves, D. Richards, M.S. Johnson, J.A. Cooke, F. Malaisse, A. Paton, J.A.C. Smith, et al. 2004. Research priorities for conservation of metallophyte biodiversity and their potential for restoration and site remediation. Restoration Ecology 12: 106–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudia M. Jacobi
    • 1
  • Flávio F. do Carmo
    • 1
  • Iara C. de Campos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations