Advertisement

AMBIO

, Volume 40, Issue 5, pp 528–539 | Cite as

Impacts of Surface Gold Mining on Land Use Systems in Western Ghana

  • Vivian Schueler
  • Tobias Kuemmerle
  • Hilmar Schröder
Report

Abstract

Land use conflicts are becoming increasingly apparent from local to global scales. Surface gold mining is an extreme source of such a conflict, but mining impacts on local livelihoods often remain unclear. Our goal here was to assess land cover change due to gold surface mining in Western Ghana, one of the world’s leading gold mining regions, and to study how these changes affected land use systems. We used Landsat satellite images from 1986–2002 to map land cover change and field interviews with farmers to understand the livelihood implications of mining-related land cover change. Our results showed that surface mining resulted in deforestation (58%), a substantial loss of farmland (45%) within mining concessions, and widespread spill-over effects as relocated farmers expand farmland into forests. This points to rapidly eroding livelihood foundations, suggesting that the environmental and social costs of Ghana’s gold boom may be much higher than previously thought.

Keywords

Ghana LUCC Surface gold mining impacts Farmland displacement Resource curse Participatory analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Wassa Association of Communities affected by Mining (WACAM); Ministry of Lands, Forest and Mines; the Office of Administration of Stool Lands; Ministry of Food and Agriculture; Land Valuation Board; Bogoso Gold Ltd.; Opportunities Industrialization Centers International (OICI) for logistic support and guidance during our field campaign. We are particularly grateful to J. Mensah-Pah, S. Boehm, and our local host who accompanied us and made safe and efficient field work possible. TK gratefully acknowledges support by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.

References

  1. Addy, S.N. 1998. Ghana: Revival of the mineral sector. Resources Policy 24(4): 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ademola, K. 2009. Agricultural land-use change during economic reforms in Ghana. Land Use Policy 26(3): 763–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adjei, E. 2007. Impact of mining on livelihoods of rural households. A case study of farmers in the Wassa Mining Region, Ghana. M. Phil., Department of Geography, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
  4. Adler, M., and C. Berke. 2006. Hilfe mit Risiken und Nebenwirkungen-Die makroökonomischen Auswirkungen von mehr Geld für Afrika. Weltwirtschaftliche Lage und Perspektive-olkswirtschaftliche Analysen der KfW Entwicklungsbank. K. Entwicklungsbank. Frankfurt am Main: 3–4.Google Scholar
  5. Agbesinyale, P. 2003. Ghana’s gold rush and regional development—The case of the Wassa West District, 357. PhD., University of Dortmund, Spring Centre, Dortmund.Google Scholar
  6. Aidara, I. 2008. Bergbauindustrie in Westafrika. Food First International 1: 4–5.Google Scholar
  7. Akabzaa, T., and A. Darimani. 2001. Impact of mining sector investment in Ghana: A study of the Tarkwa mining region. Third World Network.Google Scholar
  8. Akabzaa, T. 2005. Ashanti Goldfields Obuasi mine: A promise betrayed. African Agenda 8(2): 8–9.Google Scholar
  9. Akiwumi, F.A., and D.R. Butler. 2008. Mining and environmental change in Sierra Leone, West Africa: A remote sensing and hydrogeomorphological study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 142(1–3): 309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Akpalu, W., and P.J. Parks. 2007. Natural resource use conflict: Gold mining in tropical rainforest in Ghana. Environment and Development Economics 12: 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Amankwah, R.K., and C. Anim-Sackey. 2003. Strategies for sustainable development of the small-scale gold and diamond mining industry of Ghana. Resources Policy 29(3–4): 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Aryee, B.N.A. 2001. Ghana’s mining sector: Its contribution to the national economy. Resources Policy 27(2): 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Asante, K.A., T. Agusa, et al. 2007. Contamination status of arsenic and other trace elements in drinking water and residents from Tarkwa, a historic mining township in Ghana. Chemosphere 66(8): 1513–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ayine, D. 2001. The human rights dimension to corporate mining in Ghana: The case of Tarkwa District. Mining, Development and Social Conflicts. 1: 4–16.Google Scholar
  15. Banchirigah, S.M., and G. Hilson. 2010. De-agrarianization, re-agrarianization and local economic development: Re-orientating livelihoods in African artisanal mining communities. Policy Sciences 43(2): 157–180.Google Scholar
  16. Boas, A. 2007. Report on the aggregation/reconciliation of mining benefits in Ghana, January–June 2004 (1st aggregated report), 48. I. G. E. I. T. I.-. GEITI. Accra: Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning.Google Scholar
  17. Castella, J.C., and P.H. Verburg. 2007. Combination of process-oriented and pattern-oriented models of land-use change in a mountain area of Vietnam. Ecological Modelling 202(3–4): 410–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Congalton, R.G. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 37(1): 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coppin, P., and M.E. Bauer. 1996. Digital change detection in forest ecosystems with remote sensing imagery. Remote Sensing Reviews 13: 207–234.Google Scholar
  20. Coppin, P., I. Jonckheere, et al. 2004. Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: A review. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25(9): 1565–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. E.A.G. 2001. Information, education and communication on the environmental and socio-economic effects of surface mining. Article of the Environmental Action Group www.rainforestinfo.org.au/projects/ghana.htm.
  22. Ellis, E.C., and N. Ramankutty. 2008. Putting people in the map: Anthropogenic biomes of the world. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6(8): 439–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Essumang, D.K., D.K. Dodoo, et al. 2007. Arsenic, cadmium, and mercury in cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagititolium) and watercocoyam (Colocasia esculenta) in Tarkwa a mining community. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 79(4): 377–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Foley, J.A., R. DeFries, et al. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734): 570–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fox, J., R.R. Rindfuss, et al. 2002. People and the environment: Approaches for linking household and community surveys to remote sensing and GIS. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  26. Ghana Chamber of Mines. 2006. Facts and figures. Accra: Ghana Chamber of Mines.Google Scholar
  27. Gobeze, T., M. Bekele, et al. 2009. Participatory forest management and its impacts on livelihoods and forest status: The case of Bonga forest in Ethiopia. International Forestry Review 11(3): 346–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Habashi, F. 1996. Pollution problems in the mineral and metallurgical industries. Quebec: Metallurgie Extractive Qu′ebec.Google Scholar
  29. Hammond, D.S., V. Gond, et al. 2007. Causes and consequences of a tropical forest gold rush in the Guiana Shield, South America. AMBIO 36(8): 661–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hausmann, U., and E. Strohscheidt. 2008. Ghana: Sicherheit in Bergbau. Tatort Bergbau IV: 4.Google Scholar
  31. Hilson, G. 2002a. Harvesting mineral riches: 1000 years of gold mining in Ghana. Resources Policy 28(1–2): 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hilson, G. 2002b. Land use competition between small- and large-scale miners: A case study of Ghana. Land Use Policy 19(2): 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hirdes, W., and G. Loh. 1999. Ghana Geological Survey, Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe.Google Scholar
  34. Hirdes, W., G. Senger, et al. 1993. Explanatory notes for the geological map of southwest Ghana. B83. G. Jahrbuch, Schweizerbartśche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
  35. Kitula, A.G.N. 2006. The environmental and socio-economic impacts of mining on local livelihoods in Tanzania: A case study of Geita District. Journal of Cleaner Production 14(3–4): 405–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kuemmerle, T., V.C. Radeloff, et al. 2006. Cross-border comparison of land cover and landscape pattern in Eastern Europe using a hybrid classification technique. Remote Sensing of Environment 103(4): 449–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuma, J.S. 2007. Hydrogeological studies on the Tarkwa gold mining district, Ghana. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 66(1): 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuma, J., and P. Younger. 2004. Water quality trends in the Tarkwa gold mining district, Ghana. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 63: 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kumah, A. 2006. Sustainability and gold mining in the developing world. Journal of Cleaner Production 14(3–4): 315–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kusimi, J.M. 2008. Assessing land use and land cover change in the Wassa West District of Ghana using remote sensing. GeoJournal 71: 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lambin, E. 2003. People and the environment: Approaches for linking household and community surveys to remote sensing and GIS. Boston, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Lassey, A.G. 2002. The gloom behind the glitter of Ghana Mining. Friends of the Earth international [online] http://www.foei.org/en/resources/link/101/e1011213.html.
  43. Latifovic, R., K. Fytas, et al. 2005. Assessing land cover change resulting from large surface mining development. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 7(1): 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lebbie, A.R. 2009. Eastern Guinean forests (AT0111). World Wildlife Ecoregion Report. W. W. Fund. World Wildlife Organisation.Google Scholar
  45. Liu, J.G., G.C. Daily, et al. 2003. Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature 421: 530–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liu, J.G., T. Dietz, et al. 2007. Coupled human and natural systems. AMBIO 36: 639–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liverman, D.M., E.F. Moran, et al. 1998. People and pixels: Linking remote sensing and social science. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  48. Maconachie, R., and T. Binns. 2007. Beyond the resource curse? Diamond mining, development and post-conflict reconstruction in Sierra Leone. Resources Policy 32(3): 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Müller, F. 2004. Der Ressourcenfluch: Rohstoffexporte als Krisenfaktor. HBS-Konferenz, Berlin, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.Google Scholar
  50. Müller, D., T. Kuemmerle, et al. 2009. Lost in transition. Determinants of cropland abandonment in postsocialist Romania. Journal of Land Use Science 4(1–2): 109–129.Google Scholar
  51. National Coalition on Mining. 2006. Ghana: Campaign to stop the violence in mining. http://www.minesandcommunities.org/article.php?a=264.
  52. Pagot, E., M. Pesaresi, et al. 2008. Development of an object-oriented classification model using very high resolution satellite imagery for monitoring diamond mining activity. International Journal of Remote Sensing 29(2): 499–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reenberg, A. 2001. Agricultural land use pattern dynamics in the Sudan-Sahel—towards an event-driven framework. Land Use Policy 18(4): 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ricardo, D. 1817. On the principles of political economy and taxation. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  55. Rigina, O. 2002. Environmental impact assessment of the mining and concentration activities in the Kola Peninsula, Russia by multidate remote sensing. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 75(1): 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rodriguez, J.P., T.D. Beard, et al. 2006. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society 11(1): 28.Google Scholar
  57. Scoones, I. 1998. Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework analysis. IDS Working Paper 72. Brighton.Google Scholar
  58. Song, C., C.E. Woodcock, et al. 2001. Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: When and how to correct atmospheric effects? Remote Sensing of Environment 75(2): 230–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sousa, R.N., and M.M. Veiga. 2009. Using performance indicators to evaluate an environmental education program in artisanal gold mining Communities in the Brazilian Amazon. AMBIO 38(1): 40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sukhdev, P. 2008. The economics of ecosystems & biodivesity. TEEB Study—an interim report. P. Sukhdev. Wesseling.Google Scholar
  61. Sultana, P., S. Abeyasekera, et al. 2007. Methodological rigour in assessing participatory development. Agricultural Systems 94(2): 220–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Touré, Y.T. 1989. The current state of studies of malaria vectors. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (83): 39–41.Google Scholar
  63. Tsikata, F.S. 1997. The vicissitudes of mineral policy in Ghana. Resources Policy 23(1–2): 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tucker, C.J., D.M. Grant, et al. 2004. NASA’s global orthorectified landsat data set. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 70(3): 313–322.Google Scholar
  65. Turner, B.L., E.F. Lambin, et al. 2007. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104(52): 20666–20671.Google Scholar
  66. Veldkamp, A., and E.F. Lambin. 2001. Predicting land-use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 85(1–3): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Walker, R. 2004. Theorizing land-cover and land-use change: The case of tropical deforestation. International Regional Science Review 27(3): 247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wassa West District Assembly. 2004. Medium term development plan 2002–2004. District development plan, 140. Tarkwa: Wassa West District Assembly.Google Scholar
  69. Wunder, S. 2005. Payments for environmental services: Some nuts and bolts, 24. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vivian Schueler
    • 2
  • Tobias Kuemmerle
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hilmar Schröder
    • 2
  1. 1.Earth System AnalysisPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)PotsdamGermany
  2. 2.Geography DepartmentHumboldt-University BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations