Skip to main content

Urban Transitions: On Urban Resilience and Human-Dominated Ecosystems

AMBIO volume 39, pages 531–545 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

Urbanization is a global multidimensional process paired with increasing uncertainty due to climate change, migration of people, and changes in the capacity to sustain ecosystem services. This article lays a foundation for discussing transitions in urban governance, which enable cities to navigate change, build capacity to withstand shocks, and use experimentation and innovation in face of uncertainty. Using the three concrete case cities—New Orleans, Cape Town, and Phoenix—the article analyzes thresholds and cross-scale interactions, and expands the scale at which urban resilience has been discussed by integrating the idea from geography that cities form part of “system of cities” (i.e., they cannot be seen as single entities). Based on this, the article argues that urban governance need to harness social networks of urban innovation to sustain ecosystem services, while nurturing discourses that situate the city as part of regional ecosystems. The article broadens the discussion on urban resilience while challenging resilience theory when addressing human-dominated ecosystems. Practical examples of harnessing urban innovation are presented, paired with an agenda for research and policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Notes

  1. First author acknowledges early discussions with Erik Andersson, SLU, Sweden, on the scales of urban resilience. See also his article, Andersson (2006).

  2. In discussing Cape Town with its previous institutionalized apartheid system, we recognize that racial categories are social constructs that serve certain interests of domination. However, through practices of domination, racial categories nonetheless become real as they constrain or facilitate individuals’ access to society’s resources.

  3. It needs to be acknowledged that average per capita numbers conceals high inequities. For instance, people classified during apartheid as whites consumed more water than the majority, e.g., through being owners of wineries and being better connected to water infrastructure.

  4. Arbesman et al. (2009) mention two other possible explanations to urban innovation: that cities simply have more highly educated people, and more transient people that bring new ideas. However, the social networks of cities—especially the great number of long-distance (weak) ties—constitute a fundamental difference between urban and non-urban systems.

  5. We note how this also partly resonates with ideas from the early 1900’s as articulated by for instance the american intellectual and regional planning theorist Luis Mumford (1895–1990) (Luccarelli 1996).

References

  • ACC. 2009. Homepage African Centre for Cities (ACC), University of Cape Town. http://www.acc.uct.ac.za/. Accessed 21 July 2009.

  • Alberti, M., and J.M. Marzluff. 2004. Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: Linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban Ecosystems 7: 241–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T.F.H., R.V. O’Neill, D.L. DeAngelis, and J.B. Waide. 1986. A hierarchical concept of ecosystems, 264. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, E. 2006. Urban landscapes and sustainable cities. Ecology and Society 11 (1): 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, E., S. Barthel, and K. Ahrné. 2007. Measuring social-ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services. Ecological Applications 17 (5): 1267–1278.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbesman, S., J.M. Kleinberg, and S.H. Strogatz. 2009. Superlinear scaling for innovation in cities. Physical Review E 79 (016115): 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D.R., and D. Johnson. 2006. Can resilience be reconciled with globalization and the increasingly complex conditions of resource degradation in Asian coastal regions? Ecology and Society 11 (1), 2. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art2/.

  • Batty, M. 2008. The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science 319: 769–771.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthel, S., J. Colding, T. Elmqvist, and C. Folke. 2005. History and local management of a biodiversity-rich, urban, cultural landscape. Ecology and Society 10 (2), 10. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art10/.

  • Barthel, S., C. Folke, and J. Colding. 2010. Social-ecological memory in urban gardens: Retaining the capacity for management of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 20 (2), 255–265. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VFV-4YCGKS0-1/2/75fbc5c5324051e714a2b8efc20f128e.

  • Berkes, F., and C. Folke. eds., 1998. Linking social and ecological systems, 476 pp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. eds., 2003. Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change, 416 pp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Berling-Wolff, S., and J. Wu. 2004. Modeling urban landscape dynamics: A case study in Phoenix, USA. Urban Ecosystems 7: 215–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besteman, C. 2008. Transforming Cape Town, 296 pp. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, L.M.A., J. Lobo, D. Helbing, C. Kühnert, and G.B. West. 2007. Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104 (17), 7301–7306. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0610172104.

  • Birch, E.L., and S.M. Wachter. 2006. Rebuilding urban places after disaster: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina, 416 pp. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • Blakely, E.J. 2007. Urban planning for climate change. Working Paper, Product Code: WP07EB1. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 29 pp. http://www.lincolninst.edu/pubs/1310_Urban-Planning-for-Climate-Change.

  • Bolund, P., and S. Hunhammar. 1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics 29: 293–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgström, S., T. Elmqvist, P. Angelstam, and C. Alfsen-Norodom. 2006. Scale mismatches in management of urban landscapes. Ecology and Society 11 (2): 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanella, R., D. Etheridge, and D. Meffert. 2004. Sustainability, survivability, and the paradox of New Orleans. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1023: 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carley, M., P. Jenkins, and H. Smith. eds., 2001. Urban development and civil society: The role of communities in sustainable cities, 230 pp. London: Earthscan.

  • Carlsson, L., and F. Berkes. 2005. Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management 75: 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CFN. 2006. Networking people and nature in the city: Inspiration, issues and challenges, 32 pp. Cape Town: Cape Flats Nature (CFN). www.capeflatsnature.org.

  • City of Cape Town. 2006. Integrated development plan 2006–2007, 245 pp. Cape Town: City of Cape Town.

  • Colding, J. 2007. ‘Ecological land-use complementation’ for building resilience in urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning 81 (1–2): 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colding, J., J. Lundberg, and C. Folke. 2006. Incorporating green-area user groups in urban ecosystem management. Ambio 35 (5): 237–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., W.J. Mitsch, and J.W. Day Jr. 2006. A new vision for New Orleans and the Mississippi delta: Applying ecological economics and ecological engineering. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4 (9): 465–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CPRA. 2007. Comprehensive coastal protection master plan for Louisiana, 110 pp. New Orleans, LA: Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority of Louisiana.

  • Daily, G. 1997. What are ecosystem services? In Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems, ed. G. Daily, 1–10. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DCDC. 2009. Homepage and simulator (WaterSim) at Decision Center for a Desert City. http://dcdc.asu.edu/; http://watersim.asu.edu/. Accessed September 2009.

  • Elmqvist, T., C. Alfsen-Norodom, and J. Colding. 2008. Urban systems. In Ecosystems Vol. [5] of encyclopedia of ecology, ed. S.E. Jørgensen and B.D. Fath, 3665–3672. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ernstson, H. 2008. In Rhizomia: Actors, networks and resilience in urban landscapes, 196 pp. PhD Dissertation. Stockholm: Stockholm University. http://www.stockholmresilience.org/download/18.7f35af211c3ec4f1b1800011957/Ernstson_2008_In_Rhizomia_Thesis_21%5B1%5D.pdf

  • Ernstson, H., S. Sörlin, and T. Elmqvist. 2008. Social movements and ecosystem services—The role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in Stockholm. Ecology and Society 13 (2), 39. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art39/.

  • Ernstson, H., S. Barthel, E. Andersson, and S.T. Borgström. 2010. Scale-crossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: The case of Stockholm, Sweden. Ecology and Society (in press).

  • Falkenmark, M. 2003. Freshwater as shared between society and ecosystems: From divided approaches to integrated challenges. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society London 358: 2037–2049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. 1998. Rationality and power: Democracy in practice, 304 pp. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Folke, C. 2006. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change 16 (3): 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., S. Carpenter, B. Walker, M. Scheffer, T. Elmqvist, L. Gunderson, and C.S. Holling. 2004. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35, 557–581. http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/loi/ecolsys.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., T. Hahn, P. Olsson, and J. Norberg. 2005. Adaptive governance of social–ecological systems. Annual Reviews of Environment and Resources 30: 441–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., and P. Healey. 1999. Relational concepts of space and place: Issues for planning theory and practice. European Planning Studies 7: 623–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 76 (6): 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gober, P. 2007. Water, climate and the future of Phoenix. Geographische Rundschau 3 (4): 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, B.E. 2009. Resilience to surprise through communicative planning. Ecology and Society 14 (2): 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, N.B., S.H. Faeth, N.E. Golubiewski, C.L. Redman, J. Wu, X. Bai, and J.M. Briggs. 2008. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319: 756–760.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L.H., and C.S. Holling. eds., 2002. Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems, 450 pp. Washington, DC: Island Press.

  • Harvey, D. 1996. Justice, nature and the geography of difference, 468 pp. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Heynen, N.C., M. Kaika, and E. Swyngedouw. eds., 2006. In the nature of cities: Urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism, 271 pp. Oxford: Routledge.

  • Holling, C.S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 4: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R.W., E. Colten, S. Laska, and S.P. Leatherman. 2006. Reconstruction of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: A research perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103 (40): 14653–14660.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasny, M.E., and K. Tidball. 2009. Community gardens as contexts for science, stewardship, and civic action learning. Cities and the Environment 2 (1): 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupel, D.E. 2003. Fuel for growth: Water and Arizona’s urban environment, 294. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laska, S., and B.H. Morrow. 2006. Social vulnerabilities and Hurricane Katrina: An unnatural disaster in New Orleans. Marine Technology Society Journal 40 (4): 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, M. 2008. Re-framing resilience: A symposium report, 22 pp. STEPS Working Paper 13. Brighton: STEPS Centre. http://www.steps-centre.org/PDFs/Resilience.pdf.

  • Levin, S.A. 1998. Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems 1 (5): 431–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, J.A. 2006. The multiple lines of defense strategy to sustain Louisiana’s coast, 21 pp. New Orleans, LA: Lake Pontchartrain Basin Foundation.

  • LRA. 2007. Louisiana speaks regional plan: Vision and strategies for recovery and growth in south Louisiana, 13 pp. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana Recovery Authority.

  • Luccarelli, M. 1996. Lewis Mumford and the ecological region: The politics of planning, 230 pp. London: The Guilford Press.

  • MA. 2005. Millenium ecosystem assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being—Synthesis, 155 pp. Washington, DC: Island Press.

  • Meffert, D.J. 2008. The resilience of New Orleans: Urban and coastal adaptation to disasters and climate change, 12 pp. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy (Working Paper).

  • Midgley, G.F., R.A. Chapman, B. Hewitson, P. Johnston, M. De Wit, G. Ziervogel, P. Mukheibir, L. Van Niekerk, et al. 2005. A status quo, vulnerability and adaptation assessment of the physical and socio-economic effects of climate change in the Western Cape, 171 pp. Report to the Western Cape Government, South Africa. CSIR Report No. ENV-S-C 2005-073. Stellenbosch.

  • Murdoch, J. 2006. Post-structuralist geography, 232 pp. London: Sage.

  • OECD. 2008. OECD territorial reviews: Cape Town, South Africa, 322 pp. Paris: OECD Publishing.

  • Pickett, S.T.A., M.L. Cadenasso, and J.M. Grove. 2004. Resilient cities: meaning, models and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landscape and Urban Planning 69: 369–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A., M.L. Cadenasso, J.M. Grove, P.M. Groffman, L.E. Band, C.G. Boone, W.R. Burch, C.S.B. Grimmond, et al. 2008. Beyond urban legends: An emerging framework of urban ecology, as illustrated by the Baltimore Ecosystem Study. BioScience 58 (2): 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pumain, D., L. Sanders, and T. Saint-Julien. 1989. Villes et auto-organisation, 191 pp. Paris: Economica.

  • Redman, C.L., and A.P. Kinzig. 2008. Water can flow uphill: A narrative of central Arizona. In Agrarian landscapes in transition, ed. C.L. Redman, and D.R. Foster, 238–271. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodiek, J. 2007. Landscape planning in hazardous zones, lessons from Hurricane Katrina, August 2005. Landscape and Urban Planning 79 (1): 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D., B.J. Rochford, S. Worden, and R. Benford. 1986. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review 51: 464–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanvliet, R., J. Jackson, G. Davis, C. de Swardt, J. Mokhoele, Q. Thom, and B.D. Lane. 2004. The UNESCO biosphere reserve concept as a tool for urban sustainability: The CUBES Cape Town Case Study. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1023: 80–104.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. 1996. The city as a hybrid—On nature society and cyborg urbanization. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 7 (1): 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. 2006. Metabolic urbanization: The making of cyborg cities. In In the nature of cities: Urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism, ed. N.C. Heynen, M. Kaika, and E. Swyngedouw, 21–40. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidball, K.G., and M.E. Krasny. 2007. From risk to resilience: What role for community greening and civic ecology in cities? In Social Learning Towards a more Sustainable World, ed. A. Wals, 149–164. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

  • TMG. 2008. Homepage Mountain Group Aqufier Feasability Study & Pilot Project (TMG), Cape Town. http://www.tmg-aquifer.co.za. Accessed September 2008.

  • Törnqvist, T.E., and D.J. Meffert. 2008. Sustaining coastal urban ecosystems. Nature Geoscience 1: 805–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Törnqvist, T.E., D.J. Wallace, J.E.A. Storms, J. Wallinga, R.L. Van Dam, M. Blaauw, M.S. Derksen, C.J.W. Klerks, et al. 2008. Mississippi Delta subsidence primarily caused by compaction of Holocene. Nature Geoscience 1 (3): 173–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turok, I. 2000. Persistent polarisation post-apartheid? Progress towards urban integration in Cape Town. Urban Studies 38 (13): 2349–2377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turpie, J.K., C. Marais, and J.N. Blignaut. 2008. The Working for Water Programme: Evolution of a payments for ecosystem services mechanism that addresses both poverty and ecosystem service delivery in South Africa. Ecological Economics, 65, 788–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • USGS. 2004. Southeast Louisiana land loss: Historical and projected land loss in the Deltaic Plain (1932–2050). Electronic map. MAP ID: USGS-NWRC 2005-16-0001. Lafayette, LA: US Geological Survey—National Wetlands Research Center.

  • van der Leeuw, S.E. 2007. Information processing and its role in the rise of the European world system. In Sustainability or collapse? An integrated history and future of people on Earth, ed. R. Costanza, L.J. Graumlich, and W.L. Steffen, 213–241. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Leeuw, S.E., and J. McGlade. 1993. Information, coherence, and urban dynamics. In Urban time-scales, ed. B. Lepetit, and D. Pumain, 195–245. Paris: Anthropos Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Leeuw, S.E., and C. Aschan-Leygonie. 2005. A long-term perspective on resilience in socio-natural systems. In Micro–meso–macro: Addressing complex systems couplings, ed. U. Svedin, and H. Lilienström, 227–264. London: World Scientific Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Wilgen, B.W., D.C. Le Maitre, and R.M. Cowling. 1998. Ecosystems services, efficiency, sustainability and equity: South Africa’s working for water programme. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13: 378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westrum, R. 2006. All coherence gone: New Orleans as a resilience failure. In 2nd symposium on resilience engineering. Juan-les-Pins, France, November 8–10.

  • White, D.D., E.A. Corley, and M.S. White. 2008. Water managers’ perceptions of the science-policy interface in Phoenix, Arizona USA: Implications for an emerging boundary organization. Society and Natural Resources 21 (3): 230–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WRC. 2008. Homepage Water Resource Commission (WRC), Cape Town. http://www.wrc.org.za. Accessed September 2008.

  • Xu, Y., Y. Wu, and A. Duah. 2007. Groundwater recharge estimation of Table Mountain Group aquifer systems with case studies, 218 pp. Report No: 1329/1/07. Pretoria: Water Resource Commission (WRC).

  • Zeeman, E.C. 1977. Catastrophe theory: Selected papers, 1972–77, 675 pp. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article has been developed from the collaboration at the Stockholm Resilience Centre (www.stockholmresilience.org) and its research theme Urban Social-Ecological Systems and Globalization, which gathers 12 urban research groups across the globe. A special session organized by T. Elmqvist and H. Ernstson at the conference “Resilience 2008” in Stockholm, 14–17 April, 2008, triggered the co-authors to write this article. Especially Erik Andersson, Sverker Sörlin, Sara Borgström, and Cathy Wilkinson should be acknowledged for their valuable discussions on this topic. We also acknowledge Keith Tidball for his useful comments on an earlier draft. The first author acknowledges funding through Formas (Urban-NET) and Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Links) to finalize the article. An earlier version was presented at The 2010 AESOP Complexity and Planning Workshop “Resilient Cities” in Stockholm, 26–27 February, 2010.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Systems Ecology and Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, 10691, Stockholm, Sweden

    Henrik Ernstson

  2. School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, SHESC—ASU, 900 S. Cady Mall, P.O. Box 872402, Tempe, AZ, 85287-2402, USA

    Sander E. van der Leeuw

  3. School of Human Evolution and Social Change and the School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 875502, Tempe, AZ, 85287-5502, USA

    Charles L. Redman

  4. Tulane/Xavier Center for Bioenvironmental Research, Tulane University, Health & Environmental Research Bldg, 1324 Tulane Avenue, SL-3, New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, USA

    Douglas J. Meffert

  5. Urban Conservation Programme,, South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden, SANBI, Private Bag X7, Claremont, 7735, South Africa

    George Davis

  6. Columbia University/UNESCO Joint Program on Biosphere and Society (CUBES) and Urban Biosphere Network (URBIS), UNESCO, UNESCO Office in New York, 2 United Nations Plaza, Room 900, New York, NY, 10017, USA

    Christine Alfsen

  7. Department of Systems Ecology and Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, 10691, Stockholm, Sweden

    Thomas Elmqvist

Authors
  1. Henrik Ernstson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sander E. van der Leeuw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Charles L. Redman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Douglas J. Meffert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. George Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Christine Alfsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Thomas Elmqvist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henrik Ernstson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ernstson, H., van der Leeuw, S.E., Redman, C.L. et al. Urban Transitions: On Urban Resilience and Human-Dominated Ecosystems. AMBIO 39, 531–545 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9

Keywords

  • Urban resilience
  • Ecosystem services
  • Social–ecological processes
  • Cross-scale interactions
  • Urban innovation
  • New Orleans
  • Cape Town
  • Phoenix