Abstract
Understanding how networks change over time can help identify network properties related to stability and uncover general scaling rules of network evolution. In the analysis of static networks, the tendency of a network to form into modules has received the most support as a measure of network structure and potential stability signature. However, modularity and stability relationships have largely been explored only for networks of information flow (e.g., computer networks) and some bipartite interaction networks (e.g., plant-pollinator networks). We use a collection of over 80 commercial sex worker networks sampled across 18 years to explore the conservation of modularity over time. If modularity is a sign of stability in social or sexual networks, then modular networks should tend to stay modular over time, resulting in a negative mean–variance scaling. We find evidence of positive mean–variance scaling in network size, but a negative mean–variance scaling relationship for modularity. This suggests that commercial sex work networks conserve modularity over time, despite high turnover in the individual nodes (i.e., clients and sex workers) which make up the network. Together, our results link network structure and temporal network dynamics, and provide evidence for clear mean–variance scaling relationships in complex networks.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
R code and anonymized data are available on figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14186663.v1.
References
Azevedo RB, Leroi AM (2001) A power law for cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98(10):5699–5704
Backstrom L, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Lan X (2006) Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 44–54
Bhushan M, Narasimhan S, Rengaswamy R (2008) Robust sensor network design for fault diagnosis. Comput Chem Eng 32(4–5):1067–1084
Cai Q, Xu HC, Zhou WX (2016) Taylor’s law of temporal fluctuation scaling in stock illiquidity. Fluct Noise Lett 15(04):1650029
Duch J, Arenas A (2006) Scaling of fluctuations in traffic on complex networks. Phys Rev Lett 96(21):218702
Eriksen KA, Simonsen I, Maslov S, Sneppen K (2003) Modularity and extreme edges of the Internet. Phys Rev Lett 90(14):148701
Fortuna MA, Stouffer DB, Olesen JM, Jordano P, Mouillot D, Krasnov BR et al (2010) Nestedness versus modularity in ecological networks: two sides of the same coin? J Anim Ecol 79(4):811–817
Gilarranz LJ, Rayfield B, Liñán-Cembrano G, Bascompte J, Gonzalez A (2017) Effects of network modularity on the spread of perturbation impact in experimental metapopulations. Science 357(6347):199–201
Grilli J, Rogers T, Allesina S (2016) Modularity and stability in ecological communities. Nat Commun 7(1):1–10
Heiberger RH (2014) Stock network stability in times of crisis. Phys A 393:376–381
Hsieh CS, Kovářík J, Logan T (2014) How central are clients in sexual networks created by commercial sex? Sci Rep 4:7540
Liljeros F, Edling CR, Amaral LAN, Stanley HE, Åberg Y (2001) The web of human sexual contacts. Nature 411(6840):907–908
Liu C, Zhang ZK (2014) Information spreading on dynamic social networks. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 19(4):896–904
Maslov S, Sneppen K (2002) Specificity and stability in topology of protein networks. Science 296(5569):910–913
Maynard DS, Serván CA, Allesina S (2018) Network spandrels reflect ecological assembly. Ecol Lett 21(3):324–334
Meyers LA, Newman M, Pourbohloul B (2006) Predicting epidemics on directed contact networks. J Theor Biol 240(3):400–418
Nadini M, Sun K, Ubaldi E, Starnini M, Rizzo A, Perra N (2018) Epidemic spreading in modular time-varying networks. Sci Rep 8(1):1–11
Ndeffo Mbah ML, Liu J, Bauch CT, Tekel YI, Medlock J, Meyers LA et al (2012) The impact of imitation on vaccination behavior in social contact networks. PLoS Comput Biol 8(4):e1002469
Newman ME (2012) Communities, modules and large-scale structure in networks. Nat Phys 8(1):25–31
Poisot T, Gravel D (2014) When is an ecological network complex? Connectance drives degree distribution and emerging network properties. PeerJ 2:e251
Pons P, Latapy M (2005)Computing communities in large networks using random walks. In: International symposium on computer and information sciences. Springer, pp 284–293
Reuman DC, Zhao L, Sheppard LW, Reid PC, Cohen JE (2017) Synchrony affects Taylor’s law in theory and data. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(26):6788–6793
Robinson K, Cohen T, Colijn C (2012) The dynamics of sexual contact networks: effects on disease spread and control. Theor Popul Biol 81(2):89–96
Rocha LE, Liljeros F, Holme P (2010) Information dynamics shape the sexual networks of Internet-mediated prostitution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(13):5706–5711
Sah P, Leu ST, Cross PC, Hudson PJ, Bansal S (2017) Unraveling the disease consequences and mechanisms of modular structure in animal social networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(16):4165–4170
Sales-Pardo M, Guimera R, Moreira AA, Amaral LAN (2007) Extracting the hierarchical organization of complex systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(39):15224–15229
Song C, Saavedra S (2020) Telling ecological networks apart by their structure: an environment-dependent approach. PLoS Comput Biol 16(4):e1007787
Staniczenko PP, Kopp JC, Allesina S (2013) The ghost of nestedness in ecological networks. Nat Commun 4(1):1–6
Thébault E, Fontaine C (2010) Stability of ecological communities and the architecture of mutualistic and trophic networks. Science 329(5993):853–856
Tylianakis JM, Morris RJ (2017) Ecological networks across environmental gradients. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 48:25–48
Wellman B (2001) Computer networks as social networks. Science 293(5537):2031–2034
Xiao X, Locey KJ, White EP (2015) A process-independent explanation for the general form of Taylor’s law. Am Nat 186(2):E51–E60
Xie M, Jia Z, Chen Y, Deng Q (2012) Simulating the spreading of two competing public opinion information on complex network. Appl Math 3(9):1074–1078
Yang H, Tang M, Gross T (2015) Large epidemic thresholds emerge in heterogeneous networks of heterogeneous nodes. Sci Rep 5(1):1–12
Yoon S, Goltsev A, Mendes J (2018) Structural stability of interaction networks against negative external fields. Phys Rev E 97(4):042311
Acknowledgements
This work benefits from conversations with Dr. Barbara Brents and Jason Janeaux. The study was performed with no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TAD performed the analysis. All authors contributed to manuscript writing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dallas, T.A., Elderd, B.D. Mean–variance scaling and stability in commercial sex work networks. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 13, 55 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-023-01071-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-023-01071-2