Abstract
There are many real-world contexts in which it would be invaluable to identify intermediaries who serve as bridges for specified dyads. For instance, with respect to suicide prevention among military veterans, mental health organizations play an important role in providing information, social support, and other resources to veterans, particularly on social media, where anonymous and pseudonymous interactions may help to counteract the stigma associated with suicide and mental health. However, many at-risk individuals are overlooked in the large-scale conversations on social media and are thus less likely to benefit from those interactions. Intermediaries who can integrate those peripheral actors into the conversation, or at least deliver essential information to them, could help to resolve this issue. The critical question, then, is how to identify those potentially useful intermediaries who are well positioned to act as bridges to reach peripheral actors. To address this challenge, we propose a new network measure, targeted betweenness centrality, to identify vertices that represent potentially useful intermediaries between specified dyads, then use that measure to identify social media users who can act as opinion leaders on behalf of the US Department of Veterans Affairs to reach vertices on the periphery of the Twitter conversation about veteran suicide. The results of this study provide useful insights related to opinion leadership, the military veteran community, and suicide prevention, and more broadly, they demonstrate the practical utility of targeted betweenness centrality for real-world research across a variety of contexts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis (version 6.702). Analytic Technologies. https://sites.google.com/site/ucinetsoftware/home. Accessed 23 Sept 2020
Brandes U (2008) On variants of shortest-path betweenness centrality and their generic computation. Soc Netw 30:136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2007.11.001
Britt BC (2015) Stepwise segmented regression analysis: An iterative statistical algorithm to detect and quantify evolutionary and revolutionary transformations in longitudinal data. In: Matei SA, Russell MG, Bertino E (eds) Transparency in social media: tools, methods, and algorithms for mediating online interactions. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 125–144
Britt BC (2020a) stepseg: stepwise segmented regression analysis. GitHub. https://github.com/bcbritt/stepseg. Accessed 23 Sept 2020
Britt BC (2020b) targbetween: targeted betweenness centrality. GitHub. https://github.com/bcbritt/targbetween. Accessed 17 May 2020
Choi D-H, Noh G-Y (2020) The influence of social media use on attitude toward suicide through psychological well-being, social isolation, and social support. Inf Commun Soc 23(10):1427–1443
Coker AL, Bush HM, Clear ER, Brancato CJ, McCauley HL (2020) Bystander program effectiveness to reduce violence and violence acceptance within sexual minority male and female high school students using a cluster RCT. Prev Sci 21:434–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01073-7
Dolev S, Elovici Y, Puzis R (2010) Routing betweenness centrality. . J ACM 57(4):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/1734213.1734219
Flom PL, Friedman SR, Strauss S, Neaigus A (2004) A new measure of linkage between two sub-networks. Connections 26(1):62–70
Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in networks: I. Conceptual clarification. Soc Netw 1:215–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
Gibson K, Wilson J, Grice JL, Seymour F (2017) Resisting the silence: The impact of digital communication on young people’s talk about suicide. Youth Soc 51(8):1011–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X17720986
Crimson Hexagon (2020) Crimson hexagon. https://www.crimsonhexagon.com. Accessed 31 Mar 2020
Horvitz E, Mulligan D (2015) Data, privacy, and the greater good. Science 349(6245):253–255
igraph. (2020). igraph R package. Retrieved from https://igraph.org/r
Jashinsky J, Burton SH, Hanson CL, West J, Giraud-Carrier C, Barnes MD, Argyle T (2014) Tracking suicide risk factors through Twitter in the US. Crisis 35:51–59
Joulin A, Grave E, Bojanowski P, Mikolov T (2016) Bag of tricks for efficient text classification. arXiv:1607.01759. Accessed 31 Mar 2020
McCarthy JF, Bossarte RM, Katz IR, Thompson C, Kemp J, Hannemann CM, Nielson C, Schoenbaum M (2015) Predictive modeling and concentration of the risk of suicide: Implications for preventative interventions in the US Department of Veterans Affairs. Am J Public Health 105(9):1935–1942. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2015.302737
O’Dea B, Wan S, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Paris C, Christensen H (2015) Detecting suicidality on Twitter. Internet Interv 2:183–188
Parrott S, Britt BC, Hayes JL, Albright DL (2020) Social media and suicide: a validation of terms to help identify suicide-related social media posts. J Evid Base Soc Work. https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2020.1788478
Quinn KG (2020) Applying the popular opinion leader intervention for HIV to COVID-19. AIDS Behav. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02954-7
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2018) Suicide rising across the US. https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/suicide. Accessed 23 Sept 2020
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (2019) 2019 national veteran suicide prevention annual report. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/data-sheets/2019/2019_National_Veteran_Suicide_Prevention_Annual_Report_508.pdf. Accessed 23 Sept 2020
Wood DS, Wood BM, Watson A, Sheffield D, Hauter H (2020) Veteran suicide risk factors: a national sample of nonveteran and veteran men who died by suicide. Health Soc Work 45(1):23–30
Wyman PA, Pickering TA, Pisani AR, Rulison K, Schmeelk-Cone K, Hartley C, Gould M, Caine ED, LoMurray M, Brown CH, Valente TW (2019) Peer-adult network structure and suicide attempts in 38 high schools: Implications for network-informed suicide prevention. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 60(10):1065–1075
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Public Opinion Lab at the University of Alabama, which provided software support for data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Britt, B.C., Hayes, J.L., Musaev, A. et al. Using targeted betweenness centrality to identify bridges to neglected users in the Twitter conversation on veteran suicide. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 11, 40 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-021-00747-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-021-00747-x