Advertisement

Toward maximizing the visibility of content in social media brand pages: a temporal analysis

  • Nagendra Kumar
  • Gopi Ande
  • Jessu Shirish Kumar
  • Manish Singh
Original Article

Abstract

A large amount of content is generated everyday in social media. One of the main goals of content creators is to spread their information to a large audience. There are many factors that affect information spread, such as posting time, location, type of information, number of social connections. In this paper, we look at the problem of finding the best posting time(s) to get high content visibility. The posting time is derived taking other factors into account, such as location, type of information. In this paper, we do our analysis over Facebook pages. We propose six posting schedules that can be used for individual pages or group of pages with similar audience reaction profile. We perform our experiment on a Facebook pages dataset containing 0.3 million posts, 10 million audience reactions. Our best posting schedule can lead to seven times more number of audience reactions compared to the average number of audience reactions that users would get without following any optimized posting schedule. We also present some interesting audience reaction patterns that we obtained through daily, weekly and monthly audience reaction analysis.

Keywords

Social media analysis Posting time Information spread Characterization 

References

  1. Asur S, Huberman BA, Szabo G, Wang C (2011) Trends in social media: persistence and decay. In: Fifth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, pp 434–437Google Scholar
  2. Backstrom L (2013) News feed fyi: a window into news feed. https://www.facebook.com/business/news/News-Feed-FYI-A-Window-Into-News-Feed
  3. Bapna R, Umyarov A (2015) Do your online friends make you pay? a randomized field experiment on peer influence in online social networks. Manag Sci 61(8):1902–1920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bharathi S, Kempe D, Salek M (2007) Competitive influence maximization in social networks. Internet and Network Economics, pp 306–311Google Scholar
  5. Biswas R, Riffe D, Zillmann D (1994) Mood influence on the appeal of bad news. J Mass Commun Q 71(3):689–696Google Scholar
  6. Centola D (2010) The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science 329(5996):1194–1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen W, Wang Y, Yang S (2009) Efficient influence maximization in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, pp 199–208Google Scholar
  8. Cheng J, Adamic L, Dow PA, Kleinberg JM, Leskovec J (2014) Can cascades be predicted? In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web. ACM, pp 925–936Google Scholar
  9. Das A, Gollapudi S, Munagala K (2014) Modeling opinion dynamics in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on web search and data mining. ACM, pp 403–412Google Scholar
  10. dos Rieis JCS, de Souza FB, de Melo POSV, Prates RO, Kwak H, An J (2015) Breaking the news: first impressions matter on online news. In: Ninth International AAAI conference on web and social media, pp 357–366Google Scholar
  11. Esiyok C, Kille B, Jain BJ, Hopfgartner F, Albayrak S (2014) Users’ reading habits in online news portals. In: Proceedings of the 5th information interaction in context symposium. ACM, pp 263–266Google Scholar
  12. Farajtabar M, Ye X, Harati S, Song L, Zha H (2016) Multistage campaigning in social networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. pp. 4718–4726Google Scholar
  13. Fayyad UM, Irani KB (1992) On the handling of continuous-valued attributes in decision tree generation. Mach Learn 8(1):87–102MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. García-Laencina PJ, Sancho-Gómez JL, Figueiras-Vidal AR, Verleysen M (2009) K nearest neighbours with mutual information for simultaneous classification and missing data imputation. Neurocomputing 72(7):1483–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guille A (2013) Information diffusion in online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 2013 SIGMOD/PODS Ph. D. symposium. ACM, pp 31–36Google Scholar
  16. Kao LJ, Huang YP, Sandnes FE (2016) Mining time-dependent influential users in facebook fans group. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC 2016. IEEE, pp 718–723Google Scholar
  17. Karimi MR, Tavakoli E, Farajtabar M, Song L, Gomez RM (2016) Smart broadcasting: do you want to be seen? In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD. ACM, pp 1635–1644Google Scholar
  18. Kempe D, Kleinberg J, Tardos É (2003) Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In: Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, pp 137–146Google Scholar
  19. Kodinariya TM, Makwana PR (2013) Review on determining number of cluster in k-means clustering. Int J 1(6):90–95Google Scholar
  20. Kohavi R, John GH (1997) Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artif Intell 97(1–2):273–324CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Kwak H, Lee C, Park H, Moon S (2010) What is twitter, a social network or a news media? In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on world wide web. ACM, pp 591–600Google Scholar
  22. Kwon S, Cha M, Jung K, Chen W, Wang Y (2013) Prominent features of rumor propagation in online social media. In: 2013 IEEE 13th international conference on data mining (ICDM). IEEE, pp 1103–1108Google Scholar
  23. Lehmann J, Gonçalves B, Ramasco JJ, Cattuto C (2012) Dynamical classes of collective attention in twitter. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on world wide web. ACM, pp 251–260Google Scholar
  24. Lerman K, Ghosh R (2010) Information contagion: an empirical study of the spread of news on digg and twitter social networks. ICWSM 10:90–97Google Scholar
  25. Leskovec J, Backstrom L, Kleinberg J (2009) Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, pp. 497–506Google Scholar
  26. Leskovec J, McGlohon M, Faloutsos C, Glance N, Hurst M (2007) Patterns of cascading behavior in large blog graphs. In: Proceedings of the 2007 SIAM international conference on data mining. SIAM, pp 551–556Google Scholar
  27. Li J, Peng W, Li T, Sun T, Li Q, Xu J (2014) Social network user influence sense-making and dynamics prediction. Expert Syst Appl 41(11):5115–5124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mazloom M, Rietveld R, Rudinac S, Worring M, van Dolen W (2016) Multimodal popularity prediction of brand-related social media posts. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Multimedia Conference. ACM, pp 197–201Google Scholar
  29. McCallum A, Nigam K, et al (1998) A comparison of event models for naive bayes text classification. In: AAAI-98 workshop on learning for text categorization, vol 752. Madison, WI, pp 41–48Google Scholar
  30. Pei S, Makse HA (2013) Spreading dynamics in complex networks. J Stat Mech Theory Exp 2013(12):P12002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Perkins J (2014) Python 3 text processing with NLTK 3 cookbook. Packt Publishing Ltd, BirminghamGoogle Scholar
  32. Probst F, Grosswiele DKL, Pfleger DKR (2013) Who will lead and who will follow: identifying influential users in online social networks. Bus Inf Syst Eng 5(3):179–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rao A, Spasojevic N, Li Z, DSouza T (2015) Klout score: Measuring influence across multiple social networks. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on big data (Big Data). IEEE, pp 2282–2289Google Scholar
  34. Rizoiu MA, Xie L (2017) Online popularity under promotion: viral potential, forecasting, and the economics of time. In: ICWSM, pp. 182–191Google Scholar
  35. Spasojevic N, Li Z, Rao A, Bhattacharyya P (2015) When-to-post on social networks. In: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, pp 2127–2136Google Scholar
  36. Szabo G, Huberman BA (2010) Predicting the popularity of online content. Commun ACM 53(8):80–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tatar A, Antoniadis P, De Amorim MD, Fdida S (2014) From popularity prediction to ranking online news. Soc Netw Anal Min 4(1):174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Taylor DG, Lewin JE, Strutton D (2011) Friends, fans, and followers: do ads work on social networks? J Advert Res 51(1):258–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tsytsarau M, Palpanas T, Castellanos M (2014) Dynamics of news events and social media reaction. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, pp 901–910Google Scholar
  40. Weaver J, Tarjan P (2013) Facebook linked data via the graph API. Semant Web 4(3):245–250Google Scholar
  41. Wu S, Hofman JM, Mason WA, Watts DJ (2011) Who says what to whom on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web. ACM, pp 705–714Google Scholar
  42. Wu S, Das Sarma A, Fabrikant A, Lattanzi S, Tomkins A (2013) Arrival and departure dynamics in social networks. In: Proceedings of the sixth ACM international conference on web search and data mining. ACM, pp 233–242Google Scholar
  43. Yan R, Huang C, Tang J, Zhang Y, Li X (2012) To better stand on the shoulder of giants. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital Libraries. ACM, pp 51–60Google Scholar
  44. Yu L, Cui P, Song C, Zhang T, Yang S (2017) A temporally heterogeneous survival framework with application to social behavior dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, pp 1295–1304Google Scholar
  45. Zarezade A, Upadhyay U, Rabiee HR, Gomez-Rodriguez M (2017) Redqueen: an online algorithm for smart broadcasting in social networks. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM international conference on web search and data mining. ACM, pp 51–60Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nagendra Kumar
    • 1
  • Gopi Ande
    • 1
  • Jessu Shirish Kumar
    • 1
  • Manish Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology HyderabadSangareddyIndia

Personalised recommendations