Complex contagions and the diffusion of popular Twitter hashtags in Nigeria

  • Clay Fink
  • Aurora Schmidt
  • Vladimir BarashEmail author
  • Christopher Cameron
  • Michael Macy
Original Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Diffusion of Information and Influence in Social Networks


Social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter provide highly granular time-stamped data about the interactions and communications between people and provide us unprecedented opportunities for empirically testing theory about information flow in social networks. Using publicly available data from Twitter’s free API (Application Program Interface), we track the adoption of popular hashtags in Nigeria during 2014. These hashtags reference online marketing campaigns, major news stories, and events and issues specific to Nigeria, including reactions to the kidnapping of 276 schoolgirls in Northeastern Nigeria by the Islamic extremist group Boko Haram. We find that hashtags related to Nigerian sociopolitical issues, including the #bringbackourgirls hashtag, which was associated with protests against the Nigerian government’s response to the kidnapping, are more likely to be adopted among densely connected users with multiple network neighbors who have also adopted the hashtag, compared to mainstream news hashtags. This association between adoption threshold and local network structure is consistent with theory about the spread of complex contagions, a type of social contagion which requires social reinforcement from multiple adopting neighbors. Theory also predicts the need for a critical mass of adopters before the contagion can become viral. We illustrate this with the #bringbackourgirls hashtag by identifying the point at which the local social movement transforms into a more widespread phenomenon. We also show that these results are robust across both the follow and reply/mention/retweet networks on Twitter. Our analysis involves data mining records of hashtag adoption and of the social connections between adopters.


Complex contagion Social movements Network structure Twitter 



This work was funded by the United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) through the Minerva Initiative under Grant FA9550-15-1-0036.


  1. Barash V (2011) The dynamics of social contagion. PhD thesis, Cornell UniversityGoogle Scholar
  2. Barash V, Cameron C, Macy M (2012) Critical phenomena in complex contagions. Soc Netw 34(4):451–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BBC (2014) #BBCtrending: The man who 'disappeared' in Nigeria - #FreeCiaxon. Retrieved from Accessed 23 Dec 2015
  4. Centola D, Macy M (2007) Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties1. Am J Sociol 113(3):702–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Geonames (2015) Retrieved from Accessed 23 Dec 2015
  6. Granovetter M (1978) Threshold models of collective behavior. Am J Sociol 8(6):1420–1443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. International Telecommunications Union (2015) Statistics: percentage of individuals using the internet. Retrieved from Accessed 23 Dec 2015
  8. Know Your Meme (2015) #WeAreAllMonkeys. Retrieved from Accessed 23 Dec 2015
  9. Leskovec J, Backstrom L, Kleinberg J (2009) Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 497–506. ACMGoogle Scholar
  10. Marwell G, Oliver PE, Prahl R (1988) Social networks and collective action: a theory of the critical mass. iii. Am J Sociol 502–534Google Scholar
  11. Milgram S (1967) The small world problem. Psychol Today 2(1):60–67MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Nahon K, Hemsley J  (2013)  Going viral. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Odufuwa F (2012) Understanding what is happening in ICT in Nigeria. Technical report, Research ICT AfricaGoogle Scholar
  14. Romero DM, Meeder B, Kleinberg J (2011) Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on world wide web, pp 695–704. ACMGoogle Scholar
  15. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Weng L, Menczer F, Ahn YY (2013) Virality prediction and community structure in social networks. Scientific reports, 3Google Scholar
  17. Wikipedia (2014) YesAllWomen. Retrieved from Accessed 23 Dec 2015
  18. Wu S, Tan C, Kleinberg J, Macy M (2011) Does bad news go away faster? In: Fifth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media ICWSM. AAAIGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics LaboratoryLaurelUSA
  2. 2.Social Dynamics Laboratory, Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  3. 3.New YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations