Effects of tag usage on question response time

Analysis and prediction in StackOverflow
  • Vasudev Bhat
  • Adheesh Gokhale
  • Ravi Jadhav
  • Jagat Pudipeddi
  • Leman Akoglu
Original Article

Abstract

Given a newly posted question on a Question and Answer (Q&A) site, how long will it take until an answer is received? Does response time relate to factors about how the question asker composes the question? If so, what are those factors? With advances in social media and the Web, Q&A sites have become a major source of information for Internet users. Response time of a question is an important aspect in these sites as it is associated with the users’ satisfaction and engagement, and thus the lifespan of these online communities. In this paper, we study and estimate response time for questions in StackOverflow, a popular online Q&A forum where software developers post and answer questions related to programming. We analyze a long list of factors in the data and identify those that have clear relation with response time. Our key finding is that tag-related factors, such as their “popularity” (how often the tag is used) and the num ber of their “subscribers” (how many users can answer questions containing the tag), provide much stronger evidence than factors not related to tags. Finally, we learn models using the identified evidential features for predicting the response time of questions, which also demonstrate the significance of tags chosen by the question asker.

Keywords

Online communities Question-answering sites Collective intelligence Question response time User engagement Human behavior Evidential feature analysis 

References

  1. Anderson A, Huttenlocher DP, Kleinberg JM, Leskovec J (2012) Discovering value from community activity on focused question answering sites: a case study of stack overflow. In: KDD, pp 850–858Google Scholar
  2. Arguello J, Butler BS, Joyce E, Kraut R, Ling KS, Wang X (2006) Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities. In: CHI, pp 959–968Google Scholar
  3. Asaduzzaman M, Mashiyat A, Roy C, Schneider K (2013) Answering questions about unanswered questions of stack overflow. In: 10th working conference on mining software repositories. Mining ChallengeGoogle Scholar
  4. Avrahami D, Hudson SE (2006) Responsiveness in instant messaging: predictive models supporting inter-personal communication. In: CHI, ACM, pp 731–740Google Scholar
  5. Chawla NV (2010) Data mining for imbalanced datasets: an overview. In: Maimon O, Rokach L (eds) Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook. Springer, New York, pp. 875–886Google Scholar
  6. Dror G, Pelleg D, Rokhlenko O, Szpektor I (2012) Churn prediction in new users of yahoo! answers. In: WWW, pp 829–834Google Scholar
  7. Harper FM, Raban DR, Rafaeli S, Konstan JA (2008) Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites. In: CHI, ACM, pp 865–874Google Scholar
  8. Joyce E, Kraut RE (2006) Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. J Comput Mediat Commun 11(3):723–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lampe C, Johnston EW (2005) Follow the (slash) dot: effects of feedback on new members in an online community. In: GROUP, pp 11–20Google Scholar
  10. Mahmud J, Chen J, Nichols J (2013) When will you answer this? estimating response time in twitter. In: ICWSM. The AAAI PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Morris MR, Teevan J, Panovich K (2010) What do people ask their social networks, and why?: a survey study of status message Q&A behavior. In: SIGCHIGoogle Scholar
  12. Movshovitz-Attias D, Movshovitz-Attias Y, Steenkiste P, Faloutsos C (2013) Analysis of the reputation system and user contributions on a question answering website: Stackoverflow. In: ASONAM, pp 886–893Google Scholar
  13. Neville PG (1999) Decision trees for predictive modeling. SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Newman MEJ (2005) Power laws, pareto distributions and zipf’s law. Contemp Phys 46(5):323–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rechavi A, Rafaeli S (2011) Not all is gold that glitters: response time & satisfaction rates in Yahoo! answers. In: SocialCom/PASSAT, IEEE, pp 904–909Google Scholar
  16. Sun Y, Han J, Aggarwal CC, Chawla NV (2012) When will it happen?: relationship prediction in heterogeneous information networks. In: WSDM, ACM, pp 663–672Google Scholar
  17. Wang G, Gill K, Mohanlal M, Zheng H, Zhao BY (2013) Wisdom in the social crowd: an analysis of Quora. In: WWWGoogle Scholar
  18. Yang J, Wei X, Ackerman MS, Adamic LA (2010) Activity lifespan: an analysis of user survival patterns in online knowledge sharing communities. In: ICWSMGoogle Scholar
  19. Yao Y, Tong H, Xie T, Akoglu L, Xu F, Lu J (2014) Joint voting prediction for questions and answers in cqa. In: ASONAM, IEEE/ACM international conference, pp 340–343Google Scholar
  20. Yao Y, Tong H, Xu F, Lu J (2014) Predicting long-term impact of cqa posts: a comprehensive viewpoint. In: KDD, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 1496–1505Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vasudev Bhat
    • 1
  • Adheesh Gokhale
    • 1
  • Ravi Jadhav
    • 1
  • Jagat Pudipeddi
    • 1
  • Leman Akoglu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations