Differential blood-based diagnosis between benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer: miRNA as source for biomarkers independent of PSA level, Gleason score, or TNM status
Since the benefit of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening remains controversial, new non-invasive biomarkers for prostate carcinoma (PCa) are still required. There is evidence that microRNAs (miRNAs) in whole peripheral blood can separate patients with localized prostate cancer from healthy individuals. However, the potential of blood-based miRNAs for the differential diagnosis of PCa and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has not been tested. We compared the miRNome from blood of PCa and BPH patients and further investigated the influence of the tumor volume, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification, Gleason score, pretreatment risk status, and the pretreatment PSA value on the miRNA pattern. By microarray approach, we identified seven miRNAs that were significantly deregulated in PCa patients compared to BPH patients. Using quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR), we confirmed downregulation of hsa-miR-221* (now hsa-miR-221-5p) and hsa-miR-708* (now hsa-miR-708-3p) in PCa compared to BPH. Clinical parameters like PSA level, Gleason score, or TNM status seem to have only limited impact on the overall abundance of miRNAs in patients’ blood, suggesting a no influence of these factors on the expression of deregulated miRNAs.
KeywordsMicroRNA Prostate cancer Benign prostatic hyperplasia Microarray Expression analysis
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 6.Tornblom M, Norming U, Adolfsson J, Becker C, Abrahamsson PA, Lilja H, et al. Diagnostic value of percent free prostate-specific antigen: retrospective analysis of a population-based screening study with emphasis on men with PSA levels less than 3.0 ng/mL. Urology. 1999;53(5):945–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Bokhorst LP, Bangma CH, van Leenders GJ, Lous JJ, Moss SM, Schroder FH, et al. Prostate-specific antigen-based prostate cancer screening: reduction of prostate cancer mortality after correction for nonattendance and contamination in the Rotterdam section of the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014;65(2):329–36. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Pokorny MR, de Rooij M, Duncan E, Schroder FH, Parkinson R, Barentsz JO, et al. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies. Eur Urol. 2014;66(1):22–9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.03.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Santos JI, Teixeira AL, Dias F, Mauricio J, Lobo F, Morais A, et al. Influence of peripheral whole-blood microRNA-7 and microRNA-221 high expression levels on the acquisition of castration-resistant prostate cancer: evidences from in vitro and in vivo studies. Tumour Biol. 2014. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-1918-9.Google Scholar
- 37.Bauer AS, Keller A, Costello E, Greenhalf W, Bier M, Borries A, et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis by measurement of microRNA abundance in blood and tissue. PLoS One. 2012;7(4), e34151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034151.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 49.Nguyen MC, Tu GH, Koprivnikar KE, Gonzalez-Edick M, Jooss KU, Harding TC. Antibody responses to galectin-8, TARP and TRAP1 in prostate cancer patients treated with a GM-CSF-secreting cellular immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2010;59(9):1313–23. doi: 10.1007/s00262-010-0858-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar