The tumor-to-breast volume ratio (TBR) predicts cancer-specific survival in breast cancer patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy
- 115 Downloads
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women globally, and tumor size measured as the largest diameter of the tumor focus is currently used in tumor–lymph node–metastasis (TNM) staging for prognosis and treatment decisions. The present study utilized the tumor-to-breast volume ratio (TBR) to evaluate the relative tumor size and determined the prognostic impact of TBR on survival in patients with breast cancer. Two thousand twenty-five consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy between January 2002 and December 2008 at Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center were enrolled in this retrospective study. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to assess the prognostic effect of TBR on cancer-specific survival (CSS), and univariate log-rank test and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model were performed to identify independent prognostic factors. The optimal cutoff value of TBR was determined to be 1.70 %, and 1473 and 552 patients were categorized to low-TBR and high-TBR groups, respectively. In the whole patient cohort, CSS was significantly shorter in the high-TBR group (110.2 vs 128.5 months, P < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that TBR was an independent prognostic factor of CSS in breast cancer patients (hazard ratio (HR) 1.489, 95 % CI 1.130–1.961, P = 0.005). High TBR was independently associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer patients. This variable may serve as a valuable parameter to predict the outcomes of breast cancer.
KeywordsBreast cancer Tumor-to-breast volume ratio Mastectomy Prognosis
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The study protocol was approved by the independent ethical committee/institutional review board of Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC), and written informed consent about the treatment and researchful use of the clinical data was obtained from each participant prior to surgery. All patient data were anonymized and de-identified prior to analysis.
- 4.Marelli L, Grasso A, Pleguezuelo M, Martines H, Stigliano R, Dhillon AP, et al. Tumour size and differentiation in predicting recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: external validation of a new prognostic score. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3503–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Timmermans AJ, Lange CA, de Bois JA, van Werkhoven E, Hamming-Vrieze O, Hilgers FJ, van den Brekel MW: Tumor volume as a prognostic factor for local control and overall survival in advanced larynx cancer. Laryngoscope 2015Google Scholar
- 16.Jung HA, Park YH, Kim M, Kim S, Chang WJ, Choi MK, Hong JY, Kim SW, Kil WH, Lee JE, Nam SJ, Ahn JS, Im YH: Prognostic relevance of biological subtype overrides that of TNM staging in breast cancer: discordance between stage and biology. Tumour Biol 2014Google Scholar
- 17.Lee DS, Kim SH, Kim S, Suh YJ, Kim HK, Shim BY. Prognostic significance of breast cancer subtype and p53 overexpression in patients with locally advanced or high-risk breast cancer treated using upfront modified radical mastectomy with or without post-mastectomy radiation therapy. Int J Clin Oncol. 2012;17:447–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.van den Broek GB, Rasch CR, Pameijer FA, Peter E, van den Brekel MW, Tan IB, et al. Pretreatment probability model for predicting outcome after intraarterial chemoradiation for advanced head and neck carcinoma. Cancer-Am Cancer Soc. 2004;101:1809–17.Google Scholar