Polymorphisms in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and AKT1 as possible predictors of clinical outcome in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors
- 233 Downloads
This study aimed to investigate the association of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene polymorphism and AKT1 polymorphism with the clinical outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). The clinical outcome and the survival of NSCLC of 230 patients after treatment with EGFR-TKIs were measured. The rs712829, rs1468727 of the EGFR gene and rs1130214 of the AKT1 gene from peripheral blood cell were detected by a multiplexed single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) MassEXTEND assay. The relationship between genetic polymorphisms and clinical outcomes of treatment with EGFR-TKIs was analyzed. The response rates and the disease control rate of patients with genotype GG, GT, and TT in EGFR rs712829 were statistically very significant difference(19.7 vs 36.1 vs 50.0 %, P = 0.016 and 57.7 vs 77.8 vs 83.3 %, P = 0.026, respectively). Better disease control was also achieved in patients with the GG genotype of AKT1 rs1130214 than those with the GT and TT genotypes (65.6 vs. 48.7 %, P = 0.043). Patients carrying the EGFR rs712829 TT genotype had significantly longer PFS and OS than those with the GT or GG genotypes (9.0 vs. 7.0 vs. 5.0 months, P = 0.001 and 13.1 vs. 14.6 vs. 18.8 months, P = 0.008, respectively). In addition, patients carrying the AKT1 rs1130214 GG genotype also had significantly longer PFS than those with the GT and TT genotypes (5.5 vs. 4.5 months, P = 0.008). EGFR rs712829 polymorphism and AKT1 rs1130214 could influence the response to EGFR-TKIs therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.
KeywordsPolymorphism Lung cancer EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor
This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of the People’s Republic of China (no. 81202609) and the Tumor Pharmacy Foundation of Shanghai Pharmaceutical Association (no. 2010-YY-01-04; no. 2009-YY-01-18).
Conflicts of interest
- 6.Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, Feng J, Liu XQ, Wang C, et al. Erlotinib versus standard Chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;3:239–46.Google Scholar
- 7.Ciuleanu T, Stelmakh L, Cicenas S, Miliauskas S, Grigorescu AC, Hillenbach C, et al. Efficacy and safety of erlotinib versus chemotherapy in second-line treatment of patients with advanced, non-small-cell lung cancer with poor prognosis (TITAN): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2012;3:300–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Liu W, He L, Ramírez J, Krishnaswamy S, Kanteti R, Wang YC, et al. Functional EGFR germline polymorphisms may confer risk for EGFR somatic mutations in non-small cell lung cancer, with a predominant effect on exon 19 microdeletions. Cancer Res. 2011;71:2423–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 21.Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y, Negoro S, Okamoto I, Tsurutani J, et al. Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:121–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Brugger W, Triller N, Blasinska-Morawiec M, Curescu S, Sakalauskas R, Manikhas GM, et al. Prospective molecular marker analyses of EGFR and K S from a randomized, placebo-controlled study of erlotinib maintenance therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;9:4113–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Gabriel S, Ziaugra L, Tabbaa D. SNP genotyping using the Sequenom Mass ARRAY iPLEX platform. Current Protocols in Human Genetics 2009. Chapter 2, Unit 2 12.Google Scholar
- 39.Kumar A, Rajendran V, Sethumadhavan R, Purohit R. AKT kinase pathway: a leading target in cancer research. Sci World J. 2013;2013:756134.Google Scholar