This study aimed to identify candidate biomarkers associated with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sera from three groups, a lung cancer group (n = 11), benign control group (n = 12), and normal control group (n = 10), were collected and pooled. Protein expression profiles were analyzed by a combination of two-dimensional electrophoresis (2DE) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS). These methods were used to separate, screen, and identify proteins that were differentially expressed between stage I NSCLC and controls. Differentially expressed proteins were validated by both Western blot and ELISA in an expanded sample size (22, 18, and 18 in three groups, respectively). MALDI-MS identified 12 differentially expressed proteins in the lung cancer group compared to the two control groups. Expression of carbonic anhydrase 1 (CA1) was validated by Western blot. CA1 was significantly elevated in the lung cancer group compared to controls. ELISA results confirmed that CA1 in the lung cancer group (3.18 ± 1.27 ng/mL, n = 22) was highly expressed in stage I NSCLC patients compared to those in the benign control group (2.21 ± 0.71 ng/mL, n = 18) and the normal control group (2.04 ± 0.63 ng/mL, n = 18) (P = 0.001). In conclusion, we provide evidence that CA1 is highly expressed in the sera of stage I NSCLC patients. Additionally, CA1 might serve as a novel biomarker for early detection of NSCLC.
Carbonic anhydrase 1 Biological markers ELISA Lung cancer MALDI-MS
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Conflicts of interest
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethics Committee of Tianjin Chest Hospital and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395–409. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1102873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halling KC, Rickman OB, Kipp BR, Harwood AR, Doerr CH, Jett JR. A comparison of cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of lung cancer in bronchoscopic specimens. Chest. 2006;130(3):694–701. doi:10.1378/chest.130.3.694.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Spira A, Beane JE, Shah V, Steiling K, Liu G, Schembri F, et al. Airway epithelial gene expression in the diagnostic evaluation of smokers with suspect lung cancer. Nat Med. 2007;13(3):361–6. doi:10.1038/nm1556.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Ritorto MS, Borlak J. Combined serum and tissue proteomic study applied to a c-Myc transgenic mouse model of hepatocellular carcinoma identified novel disease regulated proteins suitable for diagnosis and therapeutic intervention strategies. J Proteome Res. 2011;10(7):3012–30. doi:10.1021/pr101207t.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Jeong HC, Kim GI, Cho SH, Lee KH, Ko JJ, Yang JH, et al. Proteomic analysis of human small cell lung cancer tissues: up-regulation of coactosin-like protein-1. J Proteome Res. 2011;10(1):269–76. doi:10.1021/pr100714b.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Dowling P, O’Driscoll L, Meleady P, Henry M, Roy S, Ballot J, et al. 2-D difference gel electrophoresis of the lung squamous cell carcinoma versus normal sera demonstrates consistent alterations in the levels of ten specific proteins. Electrophoresis. 2007;28(23):4302–10. doi:10.1002/elps.200700246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Albert JM, Gonzalez A, Massion PP, Chen H, Olson SJ, Shyr Y, et al. Cytoplasmic clusterin expression is associated with longer survival in patients with resected non small cell lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(9):1845–51. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Zhu HF, Li J, Huang L, Yan YQ. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 37 resected cases. Hepatogastroenterology. 2013;60(122):263–7. doi:10.5754/hge12711.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Perez-Sayans M, Garcia-Garcia A, Scozzafava A, Supuran CT. Inhibition of V-ATPase and carbonic anhydrases as interference strategy with tumor acidification processes. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(10):1407–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Syrjanen L, Luukkaala T, Leppilampi M, Kallioinen M, Pastorekova S, Pastorek J, et al. Expression of cancer-related carbonic anhydrases IX and XII in normal skin and skin neoplasms. APMIS. 2014;122(9):880–9. doi:10.1111/apm.12251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Unwin RD, Harnden P, Pappin D, Rahman D, Whelan P, Craven RA, et al. Serological and proteomic evaluation of antibody responses in the identification of tumor antigens in renal cell carcinoma. Proteomics. 2003;3(1):45–55. doi:10.1002/pmic.200390008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar