Tumor Biology

, Volume 36, Issue 8, pp 5757–5758 | Cite as

Comments on “In vivo post-contrast 1H-MRS evaluation of malignant and benign breast lesions: a meta-analysis”

Research Commentary


Breast cancer Comments Magnetic resonance spectroscopy 


Conflicts of interest



  1. 1.
    Tan J, Xu L, Yao W, Wan Y, Zhou S, Xin SX. In vivo post-contrast 1H-MRS evaluation of malignant and benign breast lesions: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol: J Int Soc Oncodevelopmental Biol Med. 2014.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    El-Zein M, Parent ME, Rousseau MC. Comments on a recent meta-analysis: obesity and lung cancer. Int J Cancer J Int du Cancer. 2013;132:1962–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith JK, Kwock L, Castillo M. Effects of contrast material on single-volume proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1084–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baltzer PA, Dietzel M. Breast lesions: diagnosis by using proton MR spectroscopy at 1.5 and 3.0 T—systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2013;267:735–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xu L, Huang Y, Liu X, Liu B. Effects of contrast agent and outer volume saturation bands on water suppression and shimming of hepatic single-volume proton MR spectroscopy at 3.0T. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL. 2012;2012:804698.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers (ISOBM) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medical Imaging, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical CenterGuangzhou Medical UniversityGuangzhou CityPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations