Advertisement

Tumor Biology

, Volume 36, Issue 8, pp 5757–5758 | Cite as

Comments on “In vivo post-contrast 1H-MRS evaluation of malignant and benign breast lesions: a meta-analysis”

Research Commentary

Keywords

Breast cancer Comments Magnetic resonance spectroscopy 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

None

References

  1. 1.
    Tan J, Xu L, Yao W, Wan Y, Zhou S, Xin SX. In vivo post-contrast 1H-MRS evaluation of malignant and benign breast lesions: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol: J Int Soc Oncodevelopmental Biol Med. 2014.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    El-Zein M, Parent ME, Rousseau MC. Comments on a recent meta-analysis: obesity and lung cancer. Int J Cancer J Int du Cancer. 2013;132:1962–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith JK, Kwock L, Castillo M. Effects of contrast material on single-volume proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1084–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baltzer PA, Dietzel M. Breast lesions: diagnosis by using proton MR spectroscopy at 1.5 and 3.0 T—systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2013;267:735–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xu L, Huang Y, Liu X, Liu B. Effects of contrast agent and outer volume saturation bands on water suppression and shimming of hepatic single-volume proton MR spectroscopy at 3.0T. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL. 2012;2012:804698.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers (ISOBM) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medical Imaging, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical CenterGuangzhou Medical UniversityGuangzhou CityPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations