Abstract
The relative efficacy and safety of first-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment regimens, capecitabine with irinotecan (CAPIRI) and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI), are not well defined. We identified and subsequently examined seven independent, randomized controlled clinical trials, performing a meta-analysis to compare these two treatment regimens. Using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting to search available literature until February 2014, we identified seven studies comparing safety and efficacy of CAPIRI and FOLFIRI in mCRC patients. These studies were pooled and evaluated for rates of progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and diarrhea. CAPIRI and FOLFIRI demonstrated similar efficacy outcomes, though CAPIRI was associated with a higher incidence of diarrhea. CAPIRI and FOLFIRI are equally effective options for first-line treatment of mCRC.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Howlader N, NooneAM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, et al. eds. for National Cancer Institute. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2008. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2008; R2.
Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;62(1):10–29. doi:10.3322/caac.20138. Cancer statistics.
Cersosimo RJ. Management of advanced colorectal cancer, part 1. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70(5):395–406. doi:10.2146/ajhp110532.
Stein A, Bokemeyer C. How to select the optimal treatment for first line metastatic colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(4):899–907.
Kurkjian C, Kummar S. Advances in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Am J Ther. 2009;16(5):412–20. doi:10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181907ed9.
Meta-analysis Group In Cancer. Efficacy of intravenous continuous infusion of fluorouracil compared with bolus administration in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:301–8.
Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD, Navarro M, James RD, Karasek P, et al. Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;355:1041–7.
Walko CM, Lindley C. Capecitabine: a review. Clin Ther. 2005;27(1):23–44.
Hoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G, Cox J, Kocha W, Kuperminc M, et al. Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(8):2282–92.
Van Cutsem E, Twelves C, Cassidy J, Allman D, Bajetta E, Boyer M, et al. Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(21):4097–106.
Koopman M, Antonini NF, Douma J, Wals J, Honkoop AH, Erdkamp FL, et al. Sequential versus combination chemotherapy with capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer (CAIRO): a phase III randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9582):135–42.
Souglakos J, Ziras N, Kakolyris S, Boukovinas I, Kentepozidis N, Makrantonakis P, et al. Randomised phase-II trial of CAPIRI (capecitabine, irinotecan) plus bevacizumab vs FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan) plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with unresectable/metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Br J Cancer. 2012;106(3):453–9. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.594.
Uygun K. XELIRI plus bevacizumab compared with FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line setting in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: experiences at two-institutions. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(4):2283–8.
Pectasides D, Papaxoinis G, Kalogeras KT, Eleftheraki AG, Xanthakis I, Makatsoris T, et al. XELIRI-bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI-bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group phase III trial with collateral biomarker analysis. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:271.
Ducreux M, Adenis A, Pignon JP, François E, Chauffert B, Ichanté JL, et al. Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab-based combination regimens in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: final results from a randomised phase ii study of bevacizumab plus 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin plus irinotecan versus bevacizumab plus capecitabine plus irinotecan (FNCLCC ACCORD 13/0503 study). Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(6):1236–45.
Skof E, Rebersek M, Hlebanja Z, Ocvirk J. Capecitabine plus irinotecan (XELIRI regimen) compared to 5-FU/LV plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI regimen) as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with unresectable liver-only metastases of metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised prospective phase II trial. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:120.
Köhne CH, De Greve J, Hartmann JT, Lang I, Vergauwe P, Becker K, et al. Irinotecan combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid or capecitabine plus celecoxib or placebo in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. EORTC study 40015. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(5):920–6.
Fuchs CS, Marshall J, Barrueco J. Randomized, controlled trial of irinotecan plus infusional, bolus, or oral fluoropyrimidines in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the BICC-C Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(30):4779–86.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:W65–94.
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic. Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0. (updated March, 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available at: http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/cochrane/handbook/.
Montagnani F, Chiriatti A, Licitra S, Aliberti C, Fiorentini G. Differences in efficacy and safety between capecitabine and infusional 5-fluorouracil when combined with irinotecan for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2010;9(4):243–7.
Renouf DJ, Welch S, Moore MJ, Krzyzanowska MK, Knox J, Feld R, et al. A phase II study of capecitabine, irinotecan, and bevacizumab in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012;69(5):1339–44.
Schmiegel W, Reinacher-Schick A, Arnold D, Kubicka S, Freier W, Dietrich G, et al. Capecitabine/irinotecan or capecitabine/oxaliplatin in combination with bevacizumab is effective and safe as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II study of the AIO colorectal study group. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(6):1580–7.
Funding source
This work was supported by China Medical Fund.
Conflicts of interest
None
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Hong-hua Ding, MD, and Wei-dong Wu, MD, are co-first authors.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary figure 1
Evaluation of meta-analysis sensitivity by the ‘leave-one-out’ approach. Sensitivity analysis was employed to examine the influence of individual studies on pooled estimates of (A) progression-free survival; (B) overall survival; (C) overall response rate; (D) diarrhea rate; (E) nausea rate; (F) febrile neutropenia rate; (G) neutropenia rate. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval. (GIF 13 kb)
(GIF 13 kb)
(GIF 17 kb)
(GIF 16 kb)
(GIF 56 kb)
(GIF 54 kb)
(GIF 54 kb)
Supplementary figure 2
Funnel plots for (A) overall response rate; (B) diarrhea rate; (C) nausea rate; (D) febrile neutropenia rate; (E) neutropenia rate. X-axis represents the logOR; Y-axis represents the SE of logOR. Gray circles represent published articles. Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error. (GIF 9 kb)
(GIF 9 kb)
(GIF 47 kb)
(GIF 47 kb)
(GIF 47 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ding, Hh., Wu, Wd., Jiang, T. et al. Meta-analysis comparing the safety and efficacy of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment regimens, capecitabine plus irinotecan (CAPIRI) and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI). Tumor Biol. 36, 3361–3369 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2970-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2970-1