There is no doubt that the risk of sporadic colorectal cancer is associated with such environmental factors as dietary habits, lifestyle, and also genetic factors. It has also been revealed that vitamin D intake and the level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in serum are inversely associated with colorectal cancer [4]. The role of VDR in various cellular pathways suggests it plays a crucial role in the etiology and development of cancer [15]. Many studies on VDR gene polymorphisms and sporadic CRC have shown a reduced risk of CRC for patients with the B allele of BsmI, f allele of FokI and A allele of ApaI, and t allele of TaqI, which are associated with higher activity of the vitamin D receptor, but the influence of SNPs on cancerogenesis may be modified by many elements including the environment, lifestyle, and many other genetic factors [2, 8, 16]. In our study, we found that the following genotypes are associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer: the bb (CC) genotype at the BsmI locus, the TT (AA) genotype at TaqI, and the AA (GG) genotype at ApaI. There is no statistical evidence for any association with FokI (5′-end polymorphism). We observed relatively strong linkage disequilibrium between the TaqI and ApaI loci in both the study and control groups. The T allele at TaqI is associated with the A allele at ApaI. The t allele at TaqI is associated with the a allele at ApaI. When the association of the ApaI genotype to cancer is taken into account, there is no significant association between the TaqI genotype and cancer. However, when the association of the TaqI genotype to cancer is taken into account, the association between the ApaI genotype remains significant. This suggests that the ApaI genotype is more important in modulating an individual’s susceptibility to cancer, and the association between the TaqI genotype and cancer may result from the linkage disequilibrium between TaqI and ApaI.
We also found a significant association between the BsmI genotype and cancer. Those with the bb genotype are more susceptible to cancer. However, the association between the BsmI locus and the TaqI locus is very odd. In the control group, there is linkage disequilibrium of medium strength between TaqI and BsmI. In the study group, the degree of linkage disequilibrium is large. The data indicate that among those whose BsmI genotype is bb (high risk), those who also have genotype TT at TaqI are clearly more susceptible to cancer. However, among those whose BsmI genotype is not bb (lower risk), those who have genotype TT at TaqI are clearly less susceptible to cancer.
Results from various meta-analyses have clearly shown the statistically significant association of the B allele of BsmI with reduced sporadic CRC risk using both a dominant model (BB + Bb versus bb) and recessive model (BB versus Bb + bb) [2, 8]. Our results are in agreement with other studies considering BsmI, which suggest that the B allele of the BsmI polymorphism has a protective effect against cancerogenesis in a variety of ethnical populations [8]. The BsmI polymorphism does not modify the amino acid sequence of proteins, mRNA, or protein levels. However, it exhibits strong linkage disequilibrium with other VDR SNPs, including ApaI and TaqI. This suggests that the BsmI, ApaI, and TaqI polymorphisms have a significant influence on VDR expression or mRNA processing [17].
Results obtained from many studies and observed in meta-analyses are the most reliable and have the highest statistical value. Numerous studies on different gene polymorphisms have shown that SNPs should be examined and interpreted in functional groups (e.g., groups of polymorphisms that reduce or enhance an enzyme’s activity) [2, 8]. Although the conclusions obtained are sometimes contradictory because of differing features of various populations, ethnic differences, and even differences between groups of patients, the accumulation of data from many published results is statistically more valid and can detect genetic associations with higher accuracy, while reducing the probability of false-negative results [4, 8, 18].