Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

α-Methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase (AMACR, p504s) is a marker to distinguish malignant melanomas from dysplastic nevi and melanocytic nevi

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Tumor Biology

Abstract

Routinely processed skin biopsies are still the mainstay for the diagnosis of melanocytic skin neoplasms (MSNs) and are considered the “gold standard” for individual patient management and clinical trials. The diagnostic challenge of melanocytic lesions of the skin prompts histopathologists to consider new diagnostic tools; among these, immunohistochemistry. We aimed to find putative new immunohistochemical markers, which can supplement the histological criteria used to detect dysplasia. In this immunohistochemical study, we chose a panel of promising biomarkers which could potentially differentiate between different MSN entities. These included α-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase (AMACR; p504s), which is involved in the degradation of branched chained fatty acid derivates. We analysed a cohort of benign nevi and malignant melanomas. The design of the study included 78 melanocytic skin neoplasms (26 malignant melanomas and 52 benign nevi) in a tissue microarray. Immunohistochemistry of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (p16Ink4a), methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase (AMACR), cyclin D1, and E-cadherin was performed and assessed. We have observed that the p16Ink4a, AMACR, cyclin D1, and E-cadherin showed no exclusive staining for nevi or melanomas. However, a significant overexpression of AMACR was found in malignant melanomas compared to benign nevi. AMACR overexpression was also associated with an increased p16Ink4a staining. Our results suggest AMACR as an immunohistochemical marker for distinguishing malignant melanomas and dysplastic nevi from conventional melanocytic nevi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gandini S, Sera F, Cattaruzza MS, Pasquini P, Picconi O, Boyle P, et al. Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: II. Sun exposure. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Elder DE, Clark WH, Elenitsas R, Guerry D, Halpern AC. The early and intermediate precursor lesions of tumor progression in the melanocytic system: common acquired nevi and atypical (dysplastic) nevi. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1993;10:18–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Elder D. Benign pigmented lesions and malignant melanoma. In: Elder D, editor. Lever’s histopathology of the skin. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 699–789.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rivers JK, Cockerell CJ, McBride A, Kopf AW. Quantification of histologic features of dysplastic nevi. Am J Dermatopathol. 1990;12:42–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kriegl L, Neumann J, Vieth M, Greten FR, Reu S, Jung A, et al. Up and downregulation of p16(Ink4a) expression in BRAF-mutated polyps/adenomas indicates a senescence barrier in the serrated route to colon cancer. Mod Pathol. 2011;24:1015–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferdinandusse S, Denis S, IJlst L, Dacremont G, Waterham HR, Wanders RJ. Subcellular localization and physiological role of alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase. J Lipid Res. 2000;41:1890–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. George E, Polissar NL, Wick M. Immunohistochemical evaluation of 16INK4A, E-cadherin, and cyclin D1 expression in melanoma and Spitz tumors. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;133:370–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krengel S, Grotelüschen F, Bartsch S, Tronnier M. Cadherin expression pattern in melanocytic tumors more likely depends on the melanocyte environment than on tumor cell progression. J Cutan Pathol. 2004;1:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mengel M, von Wasielewski R, Wiese B, Rudiger T, Muller-Hermelink HK, Kreipe H. Inter-laboratory and inter-observer reproducibility of immunohistochemical assessment of the Ki-67 labelling index in a large multi-centre trial. J Pathol. 2002;198:292–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsao H, Bevona C, Goggins W, Quinn T. The transformation rate of moles (melanocytic nevi) into cutaneous melanoma: a population-based estimate. Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:282–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dayi N, Baba HA, Schmid KW, Schmitz KJ. Increased expression of α-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase (AMACR; p504s) and p16 in distal hyperplastic polyps. Diagn Pathol. 2013;8:178–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Salava A, Ranki A. Saksela O [Dysplastic melanocytic nevus]. Duodecim. 2010;126:2492–501.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang S, Barnhill RL, Mihm Jr MC, Fitzpatrick TB, Sober AJ. Melanoma risk in individuals with clinically atypical nevi. Arch Dermatol. 1994;130:999–1001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang Z, Li C, Fischer A, Dresser K, Woda BA. Using an AMACR (P504S)/ 34betaE12/p63 cocktail for the detection of small focal prostate carcinoma in needle biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;123:231–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Snover DC. Serrated polyps of the large intestine. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2005;22:301–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fujimori Y, Fujimori T, Imura J, Sugai T, Yao T, Wada R, Ajioka Y, Ohkura Y. An assessment of the diagnostic criteria for sessile serrated adenoma/ polyps: SSA/Ps using image processing software analysis for Ki67 immunohistochemistry. Diagn Pathol. 2012; 59.

  17. Chin L, Garraway LA, Fisher DE. Malignant melanoma: genetics and therapeutics in the genomic era. Genes Dev. 2006;20:2149–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sparrow LE, Eldon MJ, English DR, Heenan PJ. P16 and p21WAF1 protein expression in melanocytic tumors by immunohistochemistry. Am J Dermatopathol. 1998;20:255–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hirohashi S, Kanai Y. Cell adhesion system and human cancer morphogenesis. Cancer Sci. 2003;94:575–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bachmann IM, Straume O, Puntervoll HE, Kalvenes MB, Aksle LA. Importance of P-cadherin, beta-catenin, and Wnt5a/frizzled for progression of melanocytic tumors and prognosis in cutaneous melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:8606–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tucci MG, Lucarini G, Brancorsini D, Zizzi A, Pugnaloni A, Giacchetti A, et al. Involvement of E-cadherin, beta-catenin, Cdc42 and CXCR4 in the progression and prognosis of cutaneous melanoma. Br J Dermatol. 2007;157:1212–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Kais Hussein for his valuable advice on cancer biology, Gillian Teicke for her help in revising the manuscript and Lavinia Mägel and Torsten Lippmann for their help with statistics.

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Abbas.

Additional information

Mahmoud Abbas and Eva Maria Ploch have contributed equally to this work and are considered the corresponding authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 117 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbas, M., Ploch, E.M., Wehling, J. et al. α-Methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase (AMACR, p504s) is a marker to distinguish malignant melanomas from dysplastic nevi and melanocytic nevi. Tumor Biol. 35, 12015–12020 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2500-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2500-1

Keywords

Navigation