Nonoccupational physical activity and risk of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis
- 339 Downloads
Previous studies concerning the association between nonoccupational physical activity (PA) and risk of ovarian cancer yielded mixed results. We investigated the association by performing a meta-analysis. Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed and EMBASE to June 2014. We calculated the summary relative risks (RRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models. The dose–response relationship was assessed by restricted cubic spline model and multivariate random-effect meta-regression. Nine cohort studies and ten case–control studies involving 730,703 participants and 9,459 cases of ovarian cancer were selected for meta-analysis. The analyses showed that individuals who participated in any amount of nonoccupational PA had a RR of 0.92 (95 % CI = 0.84–1.00) for risk of ovarian cancer. Those who participated in high or moderate nonoccupational PA had a RR of ovarian cancer risk of 0.89 (95 % CI = 0.79–1.01) and 0.91 (95 % CI = 0.85–0.99), respectively. Stratifying by study design and cancer subtype (borderline and invasive tumors), inverse association was only found in case–control studies. A linear but not significant dose–response relationship was found between nonoccupational PA and ovarian cancer risk. In conclusion, a weak inverse association exists between nonoccupational PA and the risk of ovarian cancer. Regarding the significant heterogeneity among included studies, confirmation in further prospective cohort studies with more accurate assessment of PA level is essential.
KeywordsPhysical activity Exercise Ovarian Cancer Incidence
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81272470).
Conflicts of interest
- 3.Olsen CM, Bain CJ, Jordan SJ, Nagle CM, Green AC, Whiteman DC, et al. Recreational physical activity and epithelial ovarian cancer: a case-control study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(11):2321–30. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0566.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Robertson J, Peterson J, Welch V et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford_web.ppt. 2010.
- 11.Orsini N, Bellocco R, Greenland S. Generalized least squares for trend estimation of summarized dose-response data. Stata J. 2006;6:40–57.Google Scholar
- 26.Xiao Q, Yang HP, Wentzensen N, Hollenbeck A, Matthews CE. Physical activity in different periods of life, sedentary behavior, and the risk of ovarian cancer in the NIH-AARP diet and health study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013;22(11):2000–8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-13-0154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Pieta B, Chmaj-Wierzchowska K, Opala T. Life style and risk of development of breast and ovarian cancer. Ann Agric Environ AAEM. 2012;19(3):379–84.Google Scholar