Advertisement

Tumor Biology

, Volume 35, Issue 9, pp 8867–8874 | Cite as

Comparison of ERCP, EUS, and ERCP combined with EUS in diagnosing pancreatic neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Hongyu Li
  • Zhigang Hu
  • Jiang Chen
  • Xiaozhong Guo
Research Article

Abstract

In the current study, we performed a systematic review of literature pertaining to the diagnostic value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and combined ERCP plus EUS to pancreatic cancer. We searched MEDLINE, OVID, and the Cochrane Library for studies evaluating diagnostic validity of ERCP, EUS, and ERCP plus EUS between January 1989 and May 2014. We obtained pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC). A total of 10 studies that included 669 patients who fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria were considered for inclusion in the analysis. The pooled sensitivities of EUS, ERCP, and EUS plus ERCP were 76.7, 57.9, and 79.9 %, respectively. The pooled specificities were 91.7, 90.6, and 94.2 %, respectively. The *Q index estimates were 0.828, 0.862, and 0.896, respectively. The *Q indices for EUS and EUS plus ERCP were significantly higher compared with ERCP (P = 0.010 and 0.008, respectively). Our meta-analysis showed that ERCP plus EUS was associated with a high diagnostic value for the detection of pancreatic neoplasms compared with ERCP and EUS alone.

Keywords

Pancreatic neoplasms Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Endoscopic ultrasonography Meta-analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 81071982).

Conflict of interest

None

References

  1. 1.
    Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: Globocan 2008. Int J Cancer J. 2010;127:2893–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cancer. CfRoP: The japan pancreas society. Summary of 20-year registry. J Jpn Pancreas Soc 2003;18:101–169.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eloubeidi MA, Chen VK, Eltoum IA, Jhala D, Chhieng DC, Jhala N, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer: diagnostic accuracy and acute and 30-day complications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:2663–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gress F, Gottlieb K, Sherman S, Lehman G. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of suspected pancreatic cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:459–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fritscher-Ravens A, Sriram PV, Krause C, Atay Z, Jaeckle S, Thonke F, et al. Detection of pancreatic metastases by eus-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:65–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agarwal B, Abu-Hamda E, Molke KL, Correa AM, Ho L. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and multidetector spiral ct in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:844–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Becker D, Strobel D, Bernatik T, Hahn EG. Echo-enhanced color- and power-doppler eus for the discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:784–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Suetomi Y, Maekawa K, Takeyama Y, Kudo M. Utility of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosis of small pancreatic carcinomas. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34:525–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aslanian HR, Estrada JD, Rossi F, Dziura J, Jamidar PA, Siddiqui UD. Endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for obstructing pancreas head masses: combined or separate procedures? J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45:711–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Higgins J, Green S: Assessment of study quality. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions updated March 2011, 2011.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A, Khan K, Coomarasamy A. Meta-disc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:31.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. The comparison of proportions from several independent samples: estimation of the marginal mean proportion. New Jersey: Wiley; 2003. p. 212–7.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cellier C, Cuillerier E, Palazzo L, Rickaert F, Flejou JF, Napoleon B, et al. Intraductal papillary and mucinous tumors of the pancreas: accuracy of preoperative computed tomography, endoscopic retrograde pancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography, and long-term outcome in a large surgical series. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47:42–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Saito M. Intraductal papillary tumors of the pancreas: evaluation with endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48:164–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Glasbrenner B, Schwarz M, Pauls S, Preclik G, Beger HG, Adler G. Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the preoperative assessment of masses in the pancreatic head. Dig Surg. 2000;17:468–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kaneko T, Nakao A, Inoue S, Sugimoto H, Hatsuno T, Ito A, et al. Intraoperative ultrasonography by high-resolution annular array transducer for intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas. Surgery. 2001;129:55–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosch T, Hofrichter K, Frimberger E, Meining A, Born P, Weigert N, et al. Ercp or eus for tissue diagnosis of biliary strictures? A prospective comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:390–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wakatsuki T, Irisawa A, Bhutani MS, Hikichi T, Shibukawa G, Takagi T, et al. Comparative study of diagnostic value of cytologic sampling by endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration and that by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography for the management of pancreatic mass without biliary stricture. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;20:1707–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schick V, Franzius C, Beyna T, Oei ML, Schnekenburger J, Weckesser M, et al. Diagnostic impact of 18f-fdg pet-ct evaluating solid pancreatic lesions versus endosonography, endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography with intraductal ultrasonography and abdominal ultrasound. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1775–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ross WA, Wasan SM, Evans DB, Wolff RA, Trapani LV, Staerkel GA, et al. Combined eus with fna and ercp for the evaluation of patients with obstructive jaundice from presumed pancreatic malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:461–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oppong K, Raine D, Nayar M, Wadehra V, Ramakrishnan S, Charnley RM. Eus-fna versus biliary brushings and assessment of simultaneous performance in jaundiced patients with suspected malignant obstruction. JOP J Pancreas. 2010;11:560–7.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gress FG, Hawes RH, Savides TJ, Ikenberry SO, Cummings O, Kopecky K, et al. Role of eus in the preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer: a large single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:786–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    DeWitt J, Devereaux B, Chriswell M, McGreevy K, Howard T, Imperiale TF, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:753–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tierney WM, Kochman ML, Scheiman JM: Computed tomography versus endoscopic ultrasonography for staging of pancreatic cancer. Annals of internal medicine 2005;142:590; author reply 590-591.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dewitt J, Devereaux BM, Lehman GA, Sherman S, Imperiale TF. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2006;4:717–25. quiz 664.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Micames C, Jowell PS, White R, Paulson E, Nelson R, Morse M, et al. Lower frequency of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed by eus-guided fna vs. Percutaneous fna. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:690–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ. Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1386–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chen VK, Arguedas MR, Kilgore ML, Eloubeidi MA. A cost-minimization analysis of alternative strategies in diagnosing pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:2223–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Erickson RA, Sayage-Rabie L, Beissner RS. Factors predicting the number of eus-guided fine-needle passes for diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:184–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fritscher-Ravens A, Brand L, Knofel WT, Bobrowski C, Topalidis T, Thonke F, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for focal pancreatic lesions in patients with normal parenchyma and chronic pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2768–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tang S, Huang G, Liu J, Liu T, Treven L, Song S, et al. Usefulness of 18f-fdg pet, combined fdg-pet/ct and eus in diagnosing primary pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2011;78:142–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cannon ME, Carpenter SL, Elta GH, Nostrant TT, Kochman ML, Ginsberg GG, et al. Eus compared with ct, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography and the influence of biliary stenting on staging accuracy of ampullary neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:27–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chang KJ. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic tumors. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1995;5:723–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fisher L, Fisher A, Thomson A. Cardiopulmonary complications of ercp in older patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:948–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bipat S, Phoa SS, van Delden OM, Bossuyt PM, Gouma DJ, Lameris JS, et al. Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and determining resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A meta-analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005;29:438–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Klapman JB, Logrono R, Dye CE, Waxman I. Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1289–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers (ISOBM) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hongyu Li
    • 1
  • Zhigang Hu
    • 2
  • Jiang Chen
    • 1
  • Xiaozhong Guo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologyGeneral Hospital of Shenyang Military AreaShenyangPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of GastroenterologyThe first College of Clinical Three Gorges UniversityYichangPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations