Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic role of D-dimer in patients with lung cancer: a meta-analysis

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Tumor Biology

Abstract

D-dimer detection in patients suffering from a variety of different types of cancer has become a hot point as an emerging and promising biomarker. In this study, therefore, we evaluated the prognostic role of D-dimer in lung cancer. Initial literature was identified using the PubMed, EMBASE, and CNKI. The primary data was hazard ratio (HR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) of survival outcomes in candidate articles, including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Finally, 11 eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis, which were published between 1996 and 2013. The estimated pooled HR and 95 % CI for OS of all studies was 2.06 (95 % CI 1.64–2.58, p < 0.00001) and the HR and 95 % CI for DFS in one study was 3.38 (95 % CI 1.17–9.75, p = 0.002). The HRs and 95 % CIs for OS in Asian and non-Asian patients were 2.48 (95 % CI 1.60–3.84, p < 0.0001) and 1.89 (95 % CI 1.44–2.47, p < 0.00001), respectively. When we further analyzed the data by various detecting methods, the pooled HR and 95 % CI for OS were 3.22 (95 % CI 1.99–5.21, p < 0.00001) for ELISA, 1.52 (95 % CI 1.25–1.86, p < 0.0001) for Latex assay, and 1.79 (95 % CI 1.19–2.69, p = 0.005) for immunoturbidimetry assay. We also did subgroup analysis according to the ratio of histological type and clinical stage. All the above analysis had positive results. This meta-analysis showed that D-dimer had a fine predictive role in lung cancer patients, especially in Asian group. Also, it demonstrated that D-dimer had a stronger predictive value by using the method ELISA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goad KE, Gralnick HR. Coagulation disorders in cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1996;10:457–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Adam SS, Key NS, Greenberg CS. D-dimer antigen: current concepts and future prospects. Blood. 2009;113:2878–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bick RL, Baker WF. Diagnostic efficacy of the D-dimer assay in disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Thromb Res. 1992;65:785–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gabazza E, Taguchi O, Yamakami T, Machishi M, Ibata H, et al. Correlation between increased granulocyte elastase release and activation of blood coagulation in patients with lung cancer. Cancer. 1993;72:2134–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Buccheri G, Ferrigno D, Ginardi C, Zuliani C. Haemostatic abnormalities in lung cancer: prognostic implications. Eur J Cancer. 1997;33:50–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Green KB, Silverstein RL. Hypercoagulability in cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1996;10:499–530.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Blackwell K, Haroon Z, Broadwater G, Berry D, Harris L, et al. Plasma D-dimer levels in operable breast cancer patients correlate with clinical stage and axillary lymph node status. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:600–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Oya M, Akiyama Y, Okuyama T, Ishikawa H. High preoperative plasma D-dimer level is associated with advanced tumor stage and short survival after curative resection in patients with colorectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2001;31:388–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Unsal E, Atalay F, Atikcan S, Yilmaz A. Prognostic significance of hemostatic parameters in patients with lung cancer. Respir Med. 2004;98:93–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldhaber SZ, Bounameaux H. Pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. Lancet. 2012;379:1835–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rossi G, Rossi V. Deep vein thrombosis. Lancet. 2005;366:118–9. author reply 119–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bick RL, Ucar K. Hypercoagulability and thrombosis. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1992;6:1421–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med. 1998;17:2815–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Williamson PR, Smith CT, Hutton JL, Marson AG. Aggregate data meta-analysis with time-to-event outcomes. Stat Med. 2002;21:3337–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. 2007;8:16.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Altiay G, Ciftci A, Demir M, Kocak Z, Sut N, et al. High plasma D-dimer level is associated with decreased survival in patients with lung cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2007;19:494–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ay C, Dunkler D, Pirker R, Thaler J, Quehenberger P, et al. High D-dimer levels are associated with poor prognosis in cancer patients. Haematologica. 2012;97:1158–64.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Komurcuoglu B, Ulusoy S, Gayaf M, Guler A, Ozden E. Prognostic value of plasma D-dimer levels in lung carcinoma. Tumori. 2011;97:743–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Masago K, Fujita S, Mio T, Togashi Y, Kim YH, et al. Clinical significance of the ratio between the alpha 2 plasmin inhibitor-plasmin complex and the thrombin-antithrombin complex in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Med Oncol. 2011;28:351–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pavey SJ, Hawson GA, Marsh NA. Impact of the fibrinolytic enzyme system on prognosis and survival associated with non-small cell lung carcinoma. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2001;12:51–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Taguchi O, Gabazza EC, Yasui H, Kobayashi T, Yoshida M, et al. Prognostic significance of plasma D-dimer levels in patients with lung cancer. Thorax. 1997;52:563–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang PP, Sun JW, Wang XY, Liu XM, Li K. Preoperative plasma D-dimer levels predict survival in patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer independently of venous thromboembolism. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39(9):951–6. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2013.06.008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang Z, Fu J, Diao D, Dang C. Pre-operative plasma D-dimer level may predict the poor prognosis within one year after the surgery for non-small cell lung cancer. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2011;14:534–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ferrigno D, Buccheri G, Ricca I. Prognostic significance of blood coagulation tests in lung cancer. Eur Respir J. 2001;17:667–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ursavaş A, Karadağ M, Uzaslan E, Yesilkaya S, Coşkun F, et al. Prognostic Significance of Plasma D-Dimer Levels in Patients with Lung Cancer Akciğer Kanserli Hastalarda Plazma D-dimer Düzeylerinin Prognostik Değeri. Eur J Gen Med. 2010;7:155–60. 1304–3897.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhou YX, Yang ZM, Feng J, Shan YJ, Wang WL, et al. High plasma D-dimer level is associated with decreased survival in patients with lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2013. doi:10.1007/s13277-013-0953-2.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Pawlotsky Y, Chales G, Coutard J, Meadeb J, Goasguen J, et al. Morning changes in the sigma ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (Westergren) and C-reactive protein. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. 1985;52:35–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Spruance SL, Reid JE, Grace M, Samore M. Hazard ratio in clinical trials. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:2787–92.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hayes DC, Secrist H, Bangur CS, Wang T, Zhang X, et al. Multigene real-time PCR detection of circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood of lung cancer patients. Anticancer Res. 2006;26:1567–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Dale S, Gogstad GO, Brosstad F, Godal HC, Holtlund J, et al. Comparison of three D-dimer assays for the diagnosis of DVT:ELISA, latex and an immunofiltration assay (NycoCard D-Dimer). Thromb Haemost. 1994;71:270–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sijens PE, van Ingen HE, van Beek EJ, Berghout A, Oudkerk M. Rapid ELISA assay for plasma D-dimer in the diagnosis of segmental and subsegmental pulmonary embolism. A comparison with pulmonary angiography. Thromb Haemost. 2000;84:156–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Angchaisuksiri P, Atichartakarn V, Aryurachai K, Archararit N, Rachakom B, et al. Risk factors of venous thromboembolism in Thai patients. Int J Hematol. 2007;86:397–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Liu.

Additional information

Xuelei Ma, Yanyan Li, and Jing Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ma, X., Li, Y., Zhang, J. et al. Prognostic role of D-dimer in patients with lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Tumor Biol. 35, 2103–2109 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-1279-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-1279-9

Keywords

Navigation