Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of electric propulsion technology and mission requirements on the performance of VTOL UAVs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
CEAS Aeronautical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the engineering challenges in aviation is the design of transitioning vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aircraft. Thrust-borne flight implies a higher mass fraction of the propulsion system, as well as much increased energy consumption in the take-off and landing phases. This mass increase is typically higher for aircraft with a separate lift propulsion system than for aircraft that use the cruise propulsion system to support a dedicated lift system. However, for a cost–benefit trade study, it is necessary to quantify the impact the VTOL requirement and propulsion configuration has on aircraft mass and size. For this reason, sizing studies are conducted. This paper explores the impact of considering a supplemental electric propulsion system for achieving hovering flight. Key variables in this study, apart from the lift system configuration, are the rotor disk loading and hover flight time, as well as the electrical systems technology level for both batteries and motors. Payload and endurance are typically used as the measures of merit for unmanned aircraft that carry electro-optical sensors, and therefore the analysis focuses on these particular parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(\dot {m}\) :

Mass flow rate

A/C:

Aircraft

AC:

Alternating current

Bat:

Battery

C :

Cruise

CTOL:

Conventional take-off and landing

DC:

Direct current

e :

Electronic

E :

Energy

E*:

Mass specific energy

ES:

Electrical system

ESC:

Electronic speed controller

g :

Gravitational acceleration

ISA:

International standard atmosphere

L :

Lift

L/D :

Lift-to-drag ratio

M :

Figure of merit

m :

Mass

m 0 :

Design gross mass

MSL:

Mean sea-level

MTOM:

Maximum take-off mass

n :

Number of

P :

Power

P :

Propeller

P*:

Mass specific power

S :

Area

T :

Thrust

t :

Time

T/W :

Thrust-to-weight ratio

TO:

Take-off

TRL:

Technology readiness level

UAV:

Unmanned aerial vehicle

VTOL:

Vertical take-off and landing

η :

Efficiency

ρ :

Density of air

τ :

Energy reserve fraction

References

  1. Finger, D.F., Braun, C., Bil, C.: A review of configuration design for distributed propulsion transitioning VTOL aircraft. In: Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology APISAT 2017, Seoul (2017)

  2. Bowers, P.M.: Unconventional Aircraft. TAB Books, Blue Ridge Summit (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kohlman, D.L.: Introduction to V/STOL Airplanes. Iowa State University Press, Iowa (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell, J.P.: Vertical Takeoff and Landing Aircraft. The Macmillan Company, New York (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Warwick, G.: Aviation week and space technology—Uber Unveils 2020 plans for electric VTOL air-taxis demos. 28 April 2017. [Online]. http://aviationweek.com/aviation-week-space-technology/uber-unveils-2020-plans-electric-vtol-air-taxis-demos. Accessed 28 Apr 2017

  6. Finger, D.F.: Comparative performance and benefit assessment of VTOL and CTOL UAVs. Aachen: Master’s Thesis—FH Aachen (2016)

  7. Raymer, D.P.: Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, 5th edn. AIAA, Virginia (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Stevens, J.H.: VTOL aircraft: 1965. Flight Int. 87, 769–792 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jenkins, D.R., Landis, T., Miller, J.: American X-Vehicles: An Inventory-X-1 to X-50—SP-2003-4531. NASA History Office, Washington, DC (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Raymer, D.P.: Living in the Future. Design Dimension Press, Los Angles (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gunston, B.: World Encyclopedia of Aero Engines. Patrick Stephens Limited, Cambridge (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Finger, D.F.: Comparative performance and benefit assessment of VTOL and CTOL UAVs. In: 65. Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress DLRK 2016, Braunschweig (2016)

  13. Gudmundsson, S.: General Aviation Aircraft Design: Applied Methods and Procedures. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ahn, J.: Design and performance prediction of a propeller operating in forward and hovering conditions. In: Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology APISAT 2017, Seoul (2017)

  15. Leishman, J.G.: Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics, 2 edn. Cambridge University Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Russel, C., Jung, J., Willink, G., Glasner, B.: Wind tunnel and hover performance test results for multicopter UAS vehicles. In: AHS 72nd Annual Forum, West Palm Beach (2016)

  17. Jossen A., Weydanz W.: Moderne Akkumulatoren richtig einsetzen. Inge Reichardt Verlag, Untermeitinge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kurochkin, F.P.: Principles of Design of Vertical Takeoff and Landing Aircraft, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. NTIS, Ohio (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Helicopter B.: Eagle Eye Pocket Guide. Bell Helicopter Textron Inc., Fort Worth (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ahn, O., Kim, J.M., Lim, C.H.: Smart UAV research program status update: achievement of tilt-rotor technology development and vision ahead. In: 27th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences ICAS 2010, Nice (2010)

  21. Patterson, M.D., German, B.J., Moore, M.D.: Performance analysis and design of on-demand electric aircraft concepts. In: 12th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference and 14th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Indianapolis (2012)

  22. Warwick, G.: Electric Potential. Are Battery Technologies Advancing Fast Enough to Enable eVTOL, pp. 38–41. Aviation Week & Space Technology, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gagg, R., Farrar, E.: Altitude performance of aircraft engines equipped with gear-driven superchargers. Troy: SAE Technical Paper 340096 (1934)

  24. Mattingly, J.D., Heiser, W.H., Pratt, D.T.: Aircraft Engine Design, 2nd edn. AIAA, Virginia (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Finger, D.F., Braun, C., Bil, C.: An initial sizing methodology for hybrid-electric light aircraft. In: AIAA Aviation Forum, Atlanta (2018)

  26. Rodas, E.A.E., Lewe, J.-H., Mavris, D.N.: Feasibility focused design of electric on-demand aircraft concepts. In: 14th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Atlanta (2014)

  27. Nicolai, L.M., Carichner, G.E.: Fundamentals of Aircraft and Airship Design, Volume 1—Aircraft Design. AIAA, Virginia (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Felix Finger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Finger, D.F., Braun, C. & Bil, C. Impact of electric propulsion technology and mission requirements on the performance of VTOL UAVs. CEAS Aeronaut J 10, 827–843 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-018-0352-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-018-0352-x

Keywords

Navigation