Impact of short- to medium-haul aircraft block time changes on airline yields

Abstract

According to various studies, significant reductions of mission fuel burn might be achieved by lowering cruise speeds using different aircraft technologies. The change of cruise speed will have an impact on aircraft operations, mainly on block times, airline networks and hence a possible impact on airline yields. Therefore, this paper describes the effect of changed block times on passenger demand and airline yields. The used methodology is based on the discrete choice theory and is applied to simulate passenger choice in airline networks using 2004 data from the US airline market. With a change of cruise speeds and corresponding block times, analyses showed an increase of average yields by +2 % with a decrease of block times by −10 %. With an increase of block times by +20 %, a decrease of average yields by −4 % was identified. Also non-linearities between changes of yields and load factors could be observed. Changes to yields are heavily depending on origin–destination (OD) characteristics and are mainly driven by available flight alternatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Abbreviations

ATM:

Air traffic management

BT:

Block time

BTS:

Bureau of Transportation Statistics

DB1B:

Airline origin and destination survey

COO:

Cost of ownership

CSR:

Cruise speed reduction

DOC:

Direct operating cost

EC:

European Commission

FFP:

Frequent flyer program

M:

Mach number

MCT:

Minimum connecting time

MGT:

Minimum ground time

NASA:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

OAG:

Official Airline Guide

OD:

Origin–destination

OR:

Open rotor

TF:

Turbofan

US:

United States

VOT:

Value of time

WTP:

Willingness to pay

References

  1. 1.

    Air Transport Action Group (ATAG): The Right Flightpath to Reduce Aviation Emissions. UNFCCC Climate Talks. Durban (2010)

  2. 2.

    Bradley, M.K., Droney, C.K.: Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research: Phase I Final Report. NASA/CR–2011-216847. Boeing Research & Technology, Huntington Beach, California (2011)

  3. 3.

    European Commission: Flightpath 2050 Europe’s Vision for Aviation—Report of the High Level Group on Aviation Research. European Commission, Luxembourg (2011)

  4. 4.

    Jensen, L., Hansman, R.J., Venuti, J.C., Reynolds, T.: Commercial airline speed optimization strategies for reduced cruise fuel consumption. In: Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. Paper Number AIAA 2013-4289. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Los Angeles, California (2013)

  5. 5.

    Greitzer, E.M., et al.: N + 3 Aircraft Concept Designs and Trade Studies. NASA/CR—2010-216794/VOL1, Final Report Volume 1 (2010)

  6. 6.

    Schmidt, M., Ploetner, K.O., Seitz, A., Isikveren, A.T., Hornung, M.: Profit-based network level evaluation of aircraft block times. In: 29th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences—ICAS. St. Petersburg, Russia (2014)

  7. 7.

    Seitz, A., Schmitt, D., Donnerhack, S.: Emission comparison of turbofan and open rotor engines under special consideration of aircraft and mission design aspects. Aeronaut J 115(11681), 351–360 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Seitz, A.: Advanced methods for propulsion system integration in aircraft conceptual design. Dissertation, Technical University of Munich (2012)

  9. 9.

    Chakraborty, I., Gross, J.R., Nam, T., Perullo, C., Mavris, D.N.: Analysis of the effect of cruise speed on fuel efficiency and cost for a truss-braced wing concept. In: AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. Paper Number AIAA 2014-2424. Atlanta, Georgia (2014)

  10. 10.

    Fan, A., Bonnefoy, P., Hamilton, B.A.: Investigation of benefits and impacts of aircraft design cruise speed reductions on airlines operations and economics. In: AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. Paper Number AIAA 2013-4315. Los Angeles, California (2013)

  11. 11.

    Jansen, P.W., Perez, R.E.: Coupled optimization of aircraft design and fleet allocation with uncertain passenger demand. In: AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. Paper Number AIAA 2013-4392. Los Angeles, California (2013)

  12. 12.

    Scheidler, M.: Discrete Choice Models for Airline Network Management. Schulz-Kirchner Verlag, Idstein (2003)

  13. 13.

    Ploetner, K.O.: Methodology of passenger demand simulation for the evaluation of future air transport concepts. In: Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2009, Document ID 121214 (2009)

  14. 14.

    Ploetner, K.O.: Simulation und Identifikation von Passagieraufkommen zur Definition zukünftiger Flugzeugkonzepte. Dissertation, Dr. Hut Verlag (2010)

  15. 15.

    Official Airline Guide: OAG Data October 2004 (2004)

  16. 16.

    Meyer, M.: Untersuchung bestehender Yield Management Methoden, Tarifsysteme und Preisbildungsmassnahmen in zivilen Luftverkehrsmärkten. Semester Thesis, Technical University of Munich (2008)

  17. 17.

    Parker, R.A.: Estimating utility of time-of-day demand for airline schedules using mixed logit model. Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, United States (2006)

  18. 18.

    Lee, S.: Modelling passenger disutilities on airline revenue management simulation. Master thesis, MIT Cambridge Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, USA (2000)

  19. 19.

    Boeing Commercial Airplane Group: Decision Window Path Preference Methodology Time Mode, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Airline Management Lecture Notes. http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/aeronautics-and-astronautics/16-75j-airline-management-spring-2006/lecture-notes/lect4a.pdf (1993). Accessed 21 Sept 2015

  20. 20.

    SKYTRAX: Airline and Airport Reviews. http://www.airlinequality.com. Last call up 06 Aug 2014

  21. 21.

    Bureau of Transport Statistics (BTS): Airline Origin and Destination Survey DB1B Coupon, October–December 2004

  22. 22.

    Bureau of Transport Statistics (BTS): T-100 Segment (All Carriers), October 2004

  23. 23.

    MIT Airline Data Project. http://web.mit.edu/airlinedata/www/default.html. Last call up 06 Aug 2014

  24. 24.

    SKYTRAX: Airline Rating and Reviews, Airport Reviews. http://www.airlinequality.com/Airports/apt_forum.htm. Last call up 30 March 2015

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kay O. Plötner.

Additional information

This paper is based on a presentation at the German Aerospace Congress, September 16–18, 2014, Augsburg, Germany.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 4 and 5.

Table 4 IATA Airline Code
Table 5 ICAO Airport three letter code

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Plötner, K.O., Schmidt, M., Röhm, T. et al. Impact of short- to medium-haul aircraft block time changes on airline yields. CEAS Aeronaut J 6, 599–611 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-015-0165-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Value of time
  • Operating cost
  • Discrete choice
  • Passenger behaviour
  • Aircraft design
  • Airline operation