Advertisement

Genes & Genomics

, Volume 40, Issue 9, pp 913–925 | Cite as

Analysis of sulphur and chlorine induced DNA cytosine methylation alterations in fresh corn (Zea mays L. saccharata and rugosa) leaf tissues by methylation sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP) approach

  • Tinashe Zenda
  • Songtao Liu
  • Daxuan Yao
  • Huijun Duan
Research Article
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

DNA (cytosine) methylation mechanism is another way through which plants respond to various cues including soil fertility amendments and abiotic stresses, and the mechanism has been used to infer some physiological, biochemical or adaptation processes. Despite numerous studies on global DNA methylation profiling in various crop species, however, researches on fresh corn (Zea mays L. saccharata or rugosa) remain largely unreported. The study aimed at investigating sulphur and chlorine induced DNA methylation changes in the fresh corn leaves of field-grown plants at the milk stage. Methylation sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP) technique was used to profile sulphur (S) and chlorine (Cl) induced DNA methylation patterns, levels and polymorphism alterations at the CCGG sites in fresh corn leaves of TDN21, JKN2000 and JKN928 hybrid cultivars. Twelve primer pairs used effectively detected 325 MSAP bands, exhibiting differentially methylated sites in the genomic DNA of all the three cultivars, with control showing higher (48.9–56.3%) type I bands as compared to sulphur (34.8–44.9%) and chlorine (40.9–47.4%) treatment samples. Consequently, total methylation levels were greater in S and Cl treatment samples than control; accounting for 43.7–59.7, 51.1–65.2 and 46.8–55.1% of total sites in TDN21, JKN2000 and JKN928, respectively. Full methylation of the internal cytosine was greater than hemi-methylation. Further, demethylation polymorphic loci significantly exceeded methylation polymorphic loci, being greater in S than Cl and control samples in all cultivars. Sulphur and chlorine have a profound influence on DNA methylation patterns and levels at the milk stage, principally by increasing the demethylation loci in the internal cytosine of the fresh corn genome. We speculate that these methylation alterations play an integral role in photosynthates assimilation and physiochemical pathways regulating quality parameters in kernels, as well as abiotic stress responses in fresh corn.

Keywords

DNA cytosine methylation Methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP) Demethylation Sulphur Fresh corn 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project of China (Selection and Efficient Combination Model of Wheat and Maize Water Saving, High Yield and High Quality Varieties) [Grant No. YB201712200008], and the Fund for the Maize Industry Production System of Hebei Province of China.

Supplementary material

13258_2018_685_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary Table S1 (DOCX 15 KB)
13258_2018_685_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (22 kb)
Supplementary Table S2 (XLSX 22 KB)
13258_2018_685_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (31 kb)
Supplementary Table S3 (XLSX 31 KB)

References

  1. Abid G, Mingeot D, Muhovski Y et al (2017) Analysis of DNA methylation patterns associated with drought stress response in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) using methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP). Environ Exp Botany 142(2017):34–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali A, Iqbal Z, Hassan SW, Yasin M, Khaliq T, Ahmed S (2013) Effect of nitrogen and sulphur on phenology, growth and yield parameters of maize crop. Sci Int (Lahore) 25(2):363–366Google Scholar
  3. Bednarek PT, Orlowska R, Niedziela A (2017) A relative quantitative methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) method for the analysis of abiotic stress. BMC Plant Bio 17(79):1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-1028-0 Google Scholar
  4. Bird A (2002) DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev 16:6–21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao DH, Gao X, Liu J, Kimatu JN, Geng SJ et al (2011) Methylation sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) reveals that alkali stress triggers more DNA hypomethylation levels in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) roots than salt stress. Afr J Biotechnol 10:18971–18980Google Scholar
  6. Cervera MT, Ruiz-Garcia L, Martinez-Zapater JM (2002) Analysis of DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana based on methylation-sensitive AFLP markers. Mol Genet Genom 268:543–552.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-002-0772-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Channabasamma A, Habsur NS, Bangaremma SW, Akshaya MC (2013) Effect of nitrogen and sulphur levels and ratios on growth and yield of maize. Mol Plant Breed 4(37):292–296.  https://doi.org/10.5376/mpb.2013.04.0037 Google Scholar
  8. Chen Q, Tao S, Bi X, Xu X, Wang L, Li X (2013) Research of total levels of DNA methylation in plant based on HPLC analysis. Am J Mol Bio 3:98101.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ajmb.2013.32013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choi CS, Sano H (2007) Abiotic-stress induces demethylation and transcriptional activation of a gene encoding a glycerophosphodiesterase-like protein in tobacco plants. Mol Genet Genom 277:589–600.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-007-0209-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chwialkowska K, Korotko U, Kosinska J, Szarejko I, Kwasniewski M (2017) Methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism sequencing (MSAP-Seq)—a method for high throughput analysis of differentially methylated CCGG sites in plants with large genomes. Front Plant Sci 8:2056.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fels.2017.02056 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12(1):13–15Google Scholar
  12. Eichten SR, Springer NM (2015) Minimal evidence for consistent changes in maize DNA methylation patterns following environmental stress. Front Plant Sci 6:308.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00308 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Farhad ISM, Islam MN, Hoque S, Bhuiyan MSI (2010) Role of potassium and sulphur on the growth, yield and oil content of soybean (Glycine max L.). Acad J Plant Sci 3(2):99–103Google Scholar
  14. Fulneček J, Kovařik A (2014) How to interpret methylation sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) profiles? BMC Genet 15:2. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/15/2
  15. Hassan F, Manaf A, Qadir G, Basra SMA (2007) Effects of sulphur on seed yield, oil, protein and glucosinolates of canola cultivars. Int J Agric Bio 9(3):504–508Google Scholar
  16. Henderson IR, Jacobsen SE (2007) Epigenetic inheritance in plants. Nature 447(7143):418–424.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05917 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Invitrogen Life Technologies (2003) AFLP Analysis System I, AFLP Starter Primer Kit. Instruction Manual. Available online at http://www.invitrogen.com. Accessed 6 Nov 2016
  18. Jamal A, Fazil IS, Ahmad S, Abdin MZ, Song JY (2005) Effect of sulphur and nitrogen application on growth characteristics, seed and oil yields of soybean cultivars. Korean J Crop Sci 50(5):340–345Google Scholar
  19. Jamal A, Fazil IS, Ahmad S, Abdin MZ (2006) Interactive effect of nitrogen and sulphur on yield and quality of groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.). Korean J Crop Sci 51(6):519–522Google Scholar
  20. Jarvan M, Edesi L, Adamson A, Lukme L, Akk A (2008) The effect of sulphur fertilization on yield, quality of protein and baking properties of winter wheat. Agron Res 6(2):459–469 Google Scholar
  21. Jiao J, Wu J, Lv Z, Sun C, Gao L, Yan X, Cui L, Tang Z, Yan B, Jia Y (2015) Methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism-based genome-wide analysis of cytosine methylation profiles in Nicotiana tabacum cultivars. Genet Mol Res 14(4):15177–15187.  https://doi.org/10.4238/2015.November.25.6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kapazoglou A, Tsaftaris A (2011) Epigenetic chromatin regulators as mediators of abiotic stress responses in cereals. In: Shanker A (ed) Abiotic stress in plants—mechanisms and adaptations, pp 307–394. ISBN 978-953-307-394-1Google Scholar
  23. Khan NA, Khan MIR, Asgher M, Fatma M, Masood A, Syeed S (2014) Salinity tolerance in plants: revisiting the role of sulfur metabolites. J Plant Bio Physiol.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9029.1000120 Google Scholar
  24. Kimatu JN, Diarso M, Song C et al (2011) DNA cytosine methylation alterations associated with aluminium toxicity and low pH in Sorghum bicolor. Afr J Agric Res 6(19):4579–4593.  https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR11.954 Google Scholar
  25. Kopriva S, Calderwood A, Weckopp SC, Koprivova A (2015) Plant sulphur and big data. Plant Sci 241:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.09.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Law JA, Jacobsen SE (2010) Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nat Rev Genet 11(3):204–220.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2719 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Lebedeva MA, Tvarogova VE, Tikhodeyev ON (2017) Epigenetic mechanisms and their role in plant development. Russ J Genet 53(10):1057–1071.  https://doi.org/10.1134/51022795417 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lei M, Zhang H, Juliana R, Tanga K, Xie AS, Zhua JK (2015) Regulatory link between DNA methylation and active demethylation in Arabidopsis. PNAS 112(11):3553–3557. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1502279112
  29. Li Z, Li T, Fan H, Lin Y (2014) Variations of DNA methylation and genes expression for brown fiber during its development process. Acta Physiol Plant.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-014-1577-x Google Scholar
  30. Liu TJ, Sun LF, Shan XH, Wu Y, Su SZ, Li SP, Liu HK, Han JY, Yuan YP (2014) Analysis of DNA methylation patterns and levels in maize hybrids and their parents. Genet Mol Res 13(4):8458–8468.  https://doi.org/10.4238/2014.October.20.22 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lu YL, Rong T, Cao MJ (2008) Analysis of DNA methylation in different maize tissues. J Genet Genom 35:41–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1673-8527(08)60006-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marconi G, Pace R, Traini A, Raggi L, Lutts S, Chiusano M, Guiducci M, Falcinelli M, Benincasa P, Albertini E (2013) Use of MSAP markers to analyse the effects of salt stress on DNA methylation in rapeseed (Brassica napus var Oleifera). PLoS ONE 8:e75597.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075597 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. More P, Agarwal P, Mastan SG, Agarwal PK (2016) MSAP marker based DNA methylation study in Salicornia brachiate DREB2A transgenic tobacco. Plant Gene 6:77–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plgene.2016.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Najeeb S, Sheikh FA, Ahangar MA, Teli NA (2011) Popularization of sweet corn (Zea mays L. saccharata) under temperate conditions to boost the socioeconomic conditions. Maize Genet Cooperation Newsl 85:54–59Google Scholar
  35. Nazar R, Iqbal N, Masood A, Syeed S, Khan NA (2011) Understanding the significance of sulphur in improving salinity tolerance in plants. Environ Exp Botany 70:80–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.09.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ortiz R, Fernandez M, Dixon J, Hellin J, Iwanaga M (2007) Speciality maize: global horticultural crop. Chron Hortic 4(4):20–25Google Scholar
  37. Pandey RV, Pulverer W, Kallmeyer R et al. (2016) MSP-HTPrimer: a high-throughput primer design tool to improve assay design for DNA methylation analysis in epigenetics. Clin Epigenetics 8(101):1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-016-0269-3 Google Scholar
  38. Penterman J, Zilberman D, Huh J et al (2007) DNA demethylation in the Arabidopsis genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(16):6752–6757.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701861104 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rodrigues MGF, Martins ABG, Bertoni BW, Figueira A, Giuliatti S (2013) Search for methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphisms in mutant figs. Genet Mol Res 12(3):2267–2280.  https://doi.org/10.4238/2013.July.8.8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Saha B, Saha S, Saha R, Hazra GC, Mandal B (2015) Influence of Zn, B and S on the yield and quality of groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.). Legume Res 38(6):832–836.  https://doi.org/10.18805/lr.v38i6.6732 Google Scholar
  41. Sienkiewicz-Cholewa U, Kieloch R (2015) Effect of sulphur and micronutrients fertilization on yield and fat content in winter rape seeds (Brassica napus L.). Plant Soil Environ 61(4):164–170.  https://doi.org/10.17221/24/2015-PSE CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stall WM, Waters L, Davis DW, Rosen C, Clough GH (2008) Sweet Corn Production: National Corn Handbook (NCH-43). Purdue University, Cooperative Extension Service of Purdue University, West Lafayette, State of Indiana, USAGoogle Scholar
  43. Su LF, Liu TJ, Shan XH et al (2015) Analysis of DNA cytosine methylation patterns in maize hybrids and their parents. Biol Plant 59(2):266–272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tan M (2010) Analysis of DNA methylation of maize in response to osmotic and salt stresses based on methylation sensitive amplified polymorphism. Plant Physiol Biochem 48(1):21–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.10.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Tani E, Polidoros AN, Nianiou-Obeidat I, Tsaftaris AS (2005) DNA methylation patterns are differently affected by planting density in maize inbreds and their hybrids. Maydica 50:19–23Google Scholar
  46. Tsaftaris AS, Polidoros AN, Kovacevic NM (2007) Epigenetics and plant breeding. In: Janick J (ed) Plant breeding reviews, vol. 30. Wiley, New York, pp 49–178Google Scholar
  47. Vanyushin BF (2006) DNA methylation in plants. In: Doerfler W, Bohm P (eds) DNA methylation: basic mechanisms. Springer, Berlin. pp 67–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Varshney RK, Dubey A (2009) Novel genomic tools and modern genetic and breeding approaches for crop improvement. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 18(2):127–138.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03263311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wada Y, Miyamoto K, Kusano T, Sano H (2004) Association between upregulation of stress-responsive genes and hypomethylation of genomic DNA in tobacco plants. Mol Genet Genom 271:658–666.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-004-1018-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang WS, Pan YJ, Zhao XQ, Dwivedi D, Zhu LH, Ali J, Fu BY, Li ZK (2011) Drought-induced site-specific DNA methylation and its association with drought tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Exp Bot 62(6):1951–1960.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq391 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Xie R, Dong S, Hu C, Wang K (2003) The role of nitrogen and sulphur interaction in maize quality (Zea mays L.). Agric Sci China 2(5):527–532Google Scholar
  52. Xiong LZ, Xu CG, Saghai Maroof MA, Zhang Q (1999) Patterns of cytosine methylation in an elite rice hybrid and its parental lines, detected by a methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism technique. Mol Gen Genet 261:439–446CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Yaish MW, Peng M, Rothstein SJ (2014) Global DNA methylation analysis using methyl-sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP). Methods Mol Biol 1062:285–295.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-580-4-16 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Zenda T, Yao D, Duan H (2017a) Sulphur and chlorine effects on yield and quality in fresh corn. Int J Plant Soil Sci 18(1):1–10.  https://doi.org/10.9734/IJPSS/2017/35343 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zenda T, Liu S, Yao D, Liu Y, Duan H (2017b) Effects of sulphur and chlorine on photosynthetic parameters, antioxidant enzyme activities and yield in fresh corn grown under field conditions. Int J Agron Agric Res 11(6):32–45Google Scholar
  56. Zhao X, Chai Y, Liu B (2007) Epigenetic inheritance and variation of DNA methylation level and pattern in maize intra-specific hybrids. Plant Sci 172:930–938.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhong L, Xu Y, Wang J (2009) DNA-methylation changes induced by salt stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Afr J Biotechnol 8:6201–6207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhu JK (2009) Active DNA demethylation mediated by DNA glycosylases. Annu Rev Genet 43:143–166.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134205 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhu M, Li K, Li F, Shi Z (2014) Correlation between the lignin content and mechanical properties of waxy corn pericarp. Sci Hortic 179:266–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Genetics Society of Korea and Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tinashe Zenda
    • 1
    • 2
  • Songtao Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Daxuan Yao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Huijun Duan
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Crop Genetics and Breeding, College of AgronomyHebei Agricultural UniversityBaodingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.North China Key Laboratory for Crop Germplasm Resources of Education MinistryHebei Agricultural UniversityBaodingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations