Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bayesian Hierarchical Models for the Combination of Spatially Misaligned Data: A Comparison of Melding and Downscaler Approaches Using INLA and SPDE

Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics (2023)Cite this article

Abstract

The spatially misaligned data problem occurs when data at different spatial scales need to be combined. Bayesian hierarchical models such as melding and downscaler approaches are suitable to solve this problem but their application is limited when MCMC is used for inference due to the high computational cost. The use of INLA and SPDE represents an alternative to MCMC for Bayesian inference that enables faster inference for latent Gaussian models. In this paper, we describe how INLA and SPDE can be adapted to fit Bayesian melding and downscaler models to combine spatially misaligned data. We assess the performance of the models using simulated and real data in a range of scenarios and sampling strategies and compare the suitability of the models in each situation. We also show how to obtain fine particulate matter (PM\(_{2.5}\)) predictions in the UK at a continuous surface and at policy-relevant spatial scales by combining spatially misaligned monitoring station data, satellite-derived indicators, road information, and environmental factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

References

  • Auchincloss AH, Gebreab SY, Mair C, Diez Roux AV (2012) A review of spatial methods in epidemiology, 2000–2010. Annu Rev Public Health 33:107–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley A, Rubak E, Turner R (2015) Spatial point patterns: methodology and applications with R. CRC Press

  • Berrocal VJ, Gelfand AE, Holland DM (2010) A spatio-temporal downscaler for output from numerical models. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 15:176

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cameletti M, Lindgren F, Simpson D, Rue H (2013) Spatio-temporal modeling of particulate matter concentration through the spde approach. AStA Adv Stat Anal 97(2):109–131

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carslaw DC, Ropkins K (2012) Openair-an r package for air quality data analysis. Environ Model Softw 27:52–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for International Earth Science Information Network, CIESIN CU (2021) Annual pm2.5 concentrations for countries and urban areas, 1998–2016

  • Chen W, Li Y, Reich BJ, Sun Y (2020) Deepkriging: spatially dependent deep neural networks for spatial prediction. arXiv:2007.11972

  • Costa AC, Soares A (2009) Homogenization of climate data: review and new perspectives using geostatistics. Math Geosci 41(3):291–305

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deng X, Zhang F, Rui W, Long W, Wang L, Feng Z, Chen D, Ding W (2013) Pm2.5-induced oxidative stress triggers autophagy in human lung epithelial a549 cells. Toxicol Vitro 27(6):1762–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicko A (2022) rgeoboundaries: a Client to geoBoundaries, A Political Administrative Boundaries Dataset. R package version 0.0.0.9000

  • Ding D, Xing J, Wang S, Liu K, Hao J (2019) Estimated contributions of emissions controls, meteorological factors, population growth, and changes in baseline mortality to reductions in ambient pm 2.5 and pm 2.5-related mortality in china, 2013–2017. Environ Health Pers 127(6):067009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenger J (1999) Urban air quality. Atmos Environ 33(29):4877–4900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes M, Raftery AE (2005) Model evaluation and spatial interpolation by bayesian combination of observations with outputs from numerical models. Biometrics 61:36–45

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter D (1995) Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. CRC Press

  • Green PJ, Łatuszyński K, Pereyra M, Robert CP (2015) Bayesian computation: a summary of the current state, and samples backwards and forwards. Stat Comput 25(4):835–862

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings WK (1970) Monte carlo sampling methods using markov chains and their applications

  • Heaton MJ, Datta A, Finley A, Furrer R, Guhaniyogi R, Gerber F, Gramacy RB, Hammerling D, Katzfuss M, Lindgren F, et al. (2017) Methods for analyzing large spatial data: A review and comparison. Preprint arXiv:1710.05013

  • Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P, Biavati G, Horányi A, Muñoz Sabater J, Nicolas J, Peubey C, Radu R, Rozum I et al (2019) Era5 monthly averaged data on single levels from 1979 to present. Copernicus Clim Change Serv Clim Data Store 10:252–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, F, Bolin D, Rue H (2022) The spde approach for gaussian and non-gaussian fields: 10 years and still running. Spat Stat:100599

  • Lindgren F, Rue H (2015) Bayesian spatial modelling with r-inla. J Stat Softw 63:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren F, Rue H, Lindström J (2011) An explicit link between gaussian fields and gaussian markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 73(4):423–498

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lu M, Cavieres J, Moraga P (2023) A comparison of spatial and nonspatial methods in statistical modeling of no2: Prediction accuracy, uncertainty quantification, and model interpretation. Geogr Anal

  • Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E (1953) Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 21(6):1087–1092

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moraga P (2019) Geospatial health data: modeling and visualization with R-INLA and shiny. CRC Press

  • Moraga P, Baker L (2022) rspatialdata: a collection of data sources and tutorials on downloading and visualising spatial data using r. F1000Research 11(770):770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moraga P, Cramb SM, Mengersen KL, Pagano M (2017) A geostatistical model for combined analysis of point-level and area-level data using inla and spde. Spat Stat 21:27–41

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • OpenStreetMap contributors (2017) Planet dump retrieved from https://planet.osm.org . https://www.openstreetmap.org

  • Padgham M, Rudis B, Lovelace R, Salmon M (2017) osmdata. J Open Source Softw 2(14)

  • Rue H, Martino S, Chopin N (2009) Approximate bayesian inference for latent gaussian models by using integrated nested laplace approximations. J R Stat Soc Ser b (Stat Methodol) 71(2):319–392

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rue H, Riebler A, Sørbye SH, Illian JB, Simpson DP, Lindgren FK (2017) Bayesian computing with inla: a review. Annu Review Stat Appl 4:395–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha A, Basu S, Datta A (2021) Random forests for spatially dependent data. J Am Stat Assoc:1–19

  • Schrödle B, Held L (2011) Spatio-temporal disease mapping using inla. Environmetrics 22(6):725–734

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vehtari A, Gelman A, Gabry J (2017) Practical bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and waic. Stat Comput 27(5):1413–1432

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Whittle P (1963) Stochastic-processes in several dimensions. Bull Int Stat Inst 40(2):974–994

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xing Y-F, Xu Y-H, Shi M-H, Lian Y-X (2016) The impact of pm2.5 on the human respiratory system. J Thoracic Dis 8(1):E69

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang F, Tan J, Zhao Q, Du Z, He K, Ma Y, Duan F, Chen G (2011) Characteristics of pm 2.5 speciation in representative megacities and across china. Atmos Chem Phys 11(11):5207–5219

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), 23955-6900, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia

    Ruiman Zhong & Paula Moraga

Authors
  1. Ruiman Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paula Moraga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruiman Zhong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhong, R., Moraga, P. Bayesian Hierarchical Models for the Combination of Spatially Misaligned Data: A Comparison of Melding and Downscaler Approaches Using INLA and SPDE. JABES (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-023-00559-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-023-00559-w

Keywords

search

Navigation