Abstract
In many biomedical experiments, such as toxicology and pharmacological dose–response studies, one primary goal is to identify a threshold value such as the minimum effective dose. This paper applies Fisher’s fiducial idea to develop an inference method for these threshold values. In addition to providing point estimates, this method also offers confidence intervals. Another appealing feature of the proposed method is that it allows the use of multiple parametric relationships to model the underlying pattern of the data and hence, reduces the risk of model mis-specification. All these parametric relationships satisfy the qualitative assumption that the response and dosage relationship is monotonic after the threshold value. In practice, this assumption may not be valid but is commonly used in dose–response studies. The empirical performance of the proposed method is illustrated with synthetic experiments and real data applications. When comparing to existing methods in the literature, the proposed method produces superior results in most synthetic experiments and real data sets. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear on-line.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agathokleous E, Belz RG, Calatayud V, De Marco A, Hoshika Y, Kitao M, Saitanis CJ, Sicard P, Paoletti E, Calabrese EJ (2019) Predicting the effect of ozone on vegetation via linear non-threshold (lnt), threshold and hormetic dose-response models. Sci Total Environ 649:61–74
Bretz F, Dette H, Pinheiro JC (2010) Practical considerations for optimal designs in clinical dose finding studies. Stat Med 29:731–742
Bretz F, Hsu J, Pinheiro J, Liu Y (2008) Dose finding-a challenge in statistics. Biom J 50:480–504
Cheng JQ, Liu RY, Xie M-G (2014) Fusion learning. Statistics Reference Online, Wiley StatsRef, pp 1–8
Coffey T, Gennings C (2007) The simultaneous analysis of mixed discrete and continuous outcomes using nonlinear threshold models. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 12:55
Cox C (1987) Threshold dose-response models in toxicology. Biometrics 43:511–523
Cui Y, Hannig J (2019) Nonparametric generalized fiducial inference for survival functions under censoring. Biometrika 106:501–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asz016
Dempster AP (2008) The Dempster–Shafer calculus for statisticians. Int J Approx Reason 48:365–377
Efron B (2013) Bayes’ theorem in the 21st century. Science 340:1177–1178
Fisher RA (1930) Inverse probability. In: Mathematical proceedings of the Cambridge philosophical society, vol 26. Cambridge University Press, pp 528–535
Gao Q, Lai RCS, Lee TCM, Li Y (2020) Uncertainty quantification for high-dimensional sparse nonparametric additive models. Technometrics 62:513–524
Guo B, Li Y (2014) Bayesian designs of phase II oncology trials to select maximum effective dose assuming monotonic dose-response relationship. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:95
Hannig J (2013) Generalized fiducial inference via discretization. Stat Sin 23:489–514
Hannig J, Iyer H, Lai RCS, Lee TCM (2016) Generalized fiducial inference: a review and new results. J Am Stat Assoc 111:1346–1361
Hannig J, Lai RCS, Lee TCM (2014) Computational issues of generalized fiducial inference. Comput Stat Data Anal 71:849–858
Hannig J, Lee TCM (2009) Generalized fiducial inference for wavelet regression. Biometrika 96:847–860
Holst U, Hossjer O, Bjorklund C, Ragnarson P, Edner H (1996) Locally weighted least squared kernel regression and statistical evaluation of lidar measurements. Environmetrics 7:401–416
Hsu JC, Berger RL (1999) Stepwise confidence intervals without multiplicity adjustment for dose response and toxicity studies. J Am Stat Assoc 94:468–482
Kim SB, Bartell SM, Gillen DL (2016) Inference for the existence of hormetic dose-response relationships in toxicology studies. Biostatistics 17:523–536. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxw004
Lai RCS, Hannig J, Lee TCM (2015) Generalized fiducial inference for ultrahigh-dimensional regression. J Am Stat Assoc 110:760–772
Lutz WK, Lutz RW (2009) Statistical model to estimate a threshold dose and its confidence limits for the analysis of sublinear dose-response relationships, exemplified for mutagenicity data. Mutat Res Genetic Toxicol Environ Mutagenesis 678:118–122
Mallik A, Sen B, Banerjee M, Michailidis G (2011) Threshold estimation based on a p-value framework in dose-response and regression settings. Biometrika 98:887–900
Martin R, Liu C (2015) Inferential models: reasoning with uncertainty, vol 145. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Muggeo VM (2003) Estimating regression models with unknown break-points. Stat Med 22:3055–3071
Otava M, Shkedy Z, Hothorn LA, Talloen W, Gerhard D, Kasim A (2017) Identification of the minimum effective dose for normally distributed data using a Bayesian variable selection approach. J Biopharm Stat 27:1073–1088
Pinheiro JC, Bretz F, Branson M (2006) Analysis of dose–response studies–modeling approaches. In: Dose finding in drug development. Springer, pp 146–171
Plummer M, Best N, Cowles K, Vines K (2006) CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. R news 6:7–11
Ranke J, Mölter K, Stock F, Bottin-Weber U, Poczobutt J, Hoffmann J, Ondruschka B, Filser J, Jastorff B (2004) Biological effects of imidazolium ionic liquids with varying chain lengths in acute vibrio fischeri and WST-1 cell viability assays. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 58:396–404
Ruberg SJ (1989) Contrasts for identifying the minimum effective dose. J Am Stat Assoc 84:816–822
Schwartz PF, Gennings C, Teuschler LK, Fariss MW (2001) Optimizing the precision of toxicity threshold estimation using a two-stage experimental design. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 6:409
Tamhane AC, Logan BR (2002) Multiple test procedures for identifying the minimum effective and maximum safe doses of a drug. J Am Stat Assoc 97:293–301
West RW, Kodell RL (2005) Changepoint alternatives to the noael. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 10:197
Williams DA (1972) The comparison of several dose levels with a zero dose control. Biometrics 28:519–531
Xie M-G, Singh K (2013) Confidence distribution, the frequentist distribution estimator of a parameter: A review. Int Stat Rev 81:3–39
Acknowledgements
The authors are most grateful to the reviewers, the associate editor, and the editor for their constructive and helpful comments that led to a much improved version of the paper. The fund was provided by National Science Foundation (Grant Nos. DMS-1811405, DMS-1811661, DMS-1916125 and CCF-1934568)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights
The work presented in this article does not involve human participants and/or animals.
Informed consent
No informed consent is needed as the data sets used in the paper are publicly available.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hwang, S., Lai, R.C.S. & Lee, T.C.M. Generalized Fiducial Inference for Threshold Estimation in Dose–Response and Regression Settings. JABES 27, 109–124 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-021-00472-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-021-00472-0