Abstract
It is not generally feasible to pick any given marginal distribution and assume there will be a way to apply a link function to add fixed and random effects in a spatial generalized linear model. We introduce an adjustment to spatial copula processes called a non-Gaussian translation process that will allow for the specification of any marginal distribution with a closed-form density function in a single unified framework. While translation processes do not preserve the exact marginal structure, they allow for fixed effects to be included in a non-Gaussian spatial model without needing to define a link function, as well as providing a number of other computational and modeling benefits. Non-Gaussian translation processes are compared theoretically and via simulation with traditional link function approaches and spatial copula processes and are shown to perform similarly in cases where all three models can effectively be used. A daily precipitation data set is analyzed with elevation as a predictor variable that includes a majority of observations being 0. Out-of-sample predictions are evaluated, and it is determined that the model is effective when compared to a two-stage prediction model and a Bayesian power truncated normal model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banerjee S, Carlin BP, Gelfand AE (2014) Hierarchical modeling and analysis for spatial data. CRC Press, Cambridge
Bárdossy A (2006) Copula-based geostatistical models for groundwater quality parameters, Water Resources Research, 42
Bárdossy A, Li J (2008) Geostatistical interpolation using copulas, Water Resources Research, 44
Bardossy A, Plate EJ (1992) Space-time model for daily rainfall using atmospheric circulation patterns. Water Resourc Res 28:1247–1259
Berrocal VJ, Raftery AE, Gneiting T et al (2008) Probabilistic quantitative precipitation field forecasting using a two-stage spatial model. Ann Appl Stat 2:1170–1193
Casson E, Coles S (1999) Spatial regression models for extremes. Extremes 1:449–468
Chen M-H, Shao Q-M, Ibrahim JG (2012) Monte Carlo methods in Bayesian computation. Springer, Berlin
Coles S, Bawa J, Trenner L, Dorazio P (2001) An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values. Springer, Berlin
Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Cressie N, Huang H-C (1999) Classes of nonseparable, spatio-temporal stationary covariance functions. J Am Stat Assoc 94:1330–1339
Cressie N, Wikle CK (2011) Statistics for spatio-temporal data. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Datta A, Banerjee S, Finley AO, Hamm NA, Schaap M (2016) Nonseparable dynamic nearest neighbor Gaussian process models for large spatio-temporal data with an application to particulate matter analysis. Ann Appl Stat 10:1286
Dean C, Lawless JF (1989) Tests for detecting overdispersion in Poisson regression models. J Am Stat Assoc 84:467–472
Diggle PJ, Tawn JA, Moyeed RA (1998) Model-based geostatistics. J Royal Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Stat) 47:299–350
Ferrante F, Arwade S, Graham-Brady L (2005) A translation model for non-stationary, non-Gaussian random processes. Prob Eng Mech 20:215–228
Grigoriu M (1998) Simulation of stationary non-Gaussian translation processes. J Eng Mech 124:121–126
Grigoriu M (2009) Existence and construction of translation models for stationary non-Gaussian processes. Prob Eng Mech 24:545–551
Hall DB (2000) Zero-inflated Poisson and binomial regression with random effects: a case study. Biometrics 56:1030–1039
Haslauer CP, Li J, Bárdossy A (2010) Application of copulas in geostatistics, in geoENV VII-Geostatistics for Environmental Applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 395–404
Holloway G, Shankar B, Rahmanb S (2002) Bayesian spatial probit estimation: a primer and an application to HYV rice adoption. Agric Econ 27:383–402
Ishwaran H, Rao JS et al (2005) Spike and slab variable selection: frequentist and Bayesian strategies. Ann Stat 33:730–773
Johnson DS, Conn PB, Hooten MB, Ray JC, Pond BA (2013) Spatial occupancy models for large data sets. Ecology 94:801–808
Kazianka H, Pilz J (2010) Copula-based geostatistical modeling of continuous and discrete data including covariates. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 24:661–673
Kazianka H, Pilz J (2011) Bayesian spatial modeling and interpolation using copulas. Comput Geosci 37:310–319
Liang F, Paulo R, Molina G, Clyde MA, Berger JO (2008) Mixtures of g priors for Bayesian variable selection. J Am Stat Assoc 103:410–423
Nieto-Barajas LE, Huerta G (2017) Spatio-temporal pareto modelling of heavy-tail data. Spatial Stat 20:92–109
Samorodnitsky G, Taqqu MS, Linde R (1996) Stable non-gaussian random processes: stochastic models with infinite variance. Bull London Math Soc 28:554–555
Sang H, Gelfand AE (2010) Continuous spatial process models for spatial extreme values. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 15:49–65
Sanso B, Guenni L (1999) Venezuelan rainfall data analysed by using a Bayesian space-time model. J Royal Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Stat) 48:345–362
Sun Y, Stein ML et al (2015) A stochastic space-time model for intermittent precipitation occurrences. Ann Appl Stat 9:2110–2132
Ver Hoef JM, Boveng PL (2007) Quasi-Poisson vs. negative binomial regression: how should we model overdispersed count data? Ecology 88:2766–2772
Wikle CK (2002) A kernel-based spectral model for non-Gaussian spatio-temporal processes. Stat Modell 2:299–314
Zhang H (2002) On estimation and prediction for spatial generalized linear mixed models. Biometrics 58:129–136
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Richardson, R. Spatial Generalized Linear Models with Non-Gaussian Translation Processes. JABES 27, 4–21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-021-00458-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-021-00458-y