Abstract
The association between infection times of the udder quarters of a dairy cow is essential information for the preventive control of udder infections in a dairy cow herd. Extensions of the correlated frailty model are proposed to investigate and compare different correlation structures among the four udder quarter infection times clustered within a cow. Such complex frailty models can be fitted with the SAEM-MCMC algorithm. It is demonstrated that substantial correlation exists between the udder quarter infection times, with the correlation within front and rear udder quarters being larger than between front and rear udder quarters. This signifies that an infected udder quarter is a risk factor for the other udder quarters, especially when the udder quarter is in the same region, i.e., front or rear.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allassonnière, S., E. Kuhn, and A. Trouvé (2010). Construction of Bayesian deformable models via a stochastic approximation algorithm: a convergence study. Bernoulli 16(3), 641–678.
Andersen, P., J. Klein, K. Knudsen, and R. Tabanera y Palacios (1997). Estimation of variance in cox’s regression model with shared gamma frailties. Biometrics 53, 1475–1484.
Cox, D. R. and D. V. Hinkley (1974). Theoretical statistics. Chapman and Hall, London.
Dempster, A. P., N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 39(1), 1–38. With discussion.
Duchateau, L. and P. Janssen (2008). The Frailty Model. Statistics for Biology and Health. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Geerdens, C., G. Claeskens, and P. Janssen (2013). Goodness-of-fit tests for the frailty distribution in proportional hazards models with shared frailty. Biostatistics 14(3), 433–446.
Goethals, K., B. Ampe, H. Berkvens, H. Laevens, P. Janssen, and L. Duchateau (2009). Modeling interval-censored, clustered cow udder quarter infection times through the shared gamma frailty model. JABES 14(1), 1–14.
Kuhn, E. and C. El-Nouty (2013). On a convergent stochastic estimation algorithm for frailty models. Stat. Comput. 23(3), 413–423.
Kuhn, E. and M. Lavielle (2004). Coupling a stochastic approximation version of EM with an MCMC procedure. ESAIM Probab. Stat. 8, 115–131 (electronic).
Laevens, H., H. Deluiker, Y. H. Schukken, L. De Meulemeester, R. Vandermeersch, E. De Mulenaere, and A. De Kruif (1997). Influence of parity and stage of lactation on the somatic cell count in bacteriologically negative dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 3219–3226.
Louis, T. A. (1982). Finding the observed information matrix when using the EM algorithm. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 44(2), 226–233.
Meyn, S. P. and R. L. Tweedie (1993). Markov chains and stochastic stability. Communications and Control Engineering Series. London: Springer-Verlag London Ltd.
Seegers, H., C. Fourichon, and F. Beaudeau (2003). Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. Veterinary Research 34, 475–491.
Vaupel, J., K. Manton, and E. Stallard (1979). The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demography 16, 439–454.
Wienke, A. (2011). Frailty models in survival analysis, Volume 37 of Chapman & Hall/CRC Biostatistics Series. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Yashin, A., J. Vaupel, and I. Iachine (1995). Correlated individual frailty: an advantageous approach to survival analysis of bivariate data. Mathematical population studies 5(2), 145–159.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Expression of the Complete Log-Likelihood of the Correlated Frailty Model \(\mathcal {M}_1\) with a Weibull Baseline Hazard
1.2 Expression of the Complete Log-Likelihood of the Correlated Frailty Model \(\mathcal {M}_1\) with a Piecewise Constant Baseline Hazard
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuhn, E., Goethals, K., El-Nouty, C. et al. Assessing the Correlation Structure in Cow Udder Quarter Infection Times Through Extensions of the Correlated Frailty Model. JABES 21, 601–618 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-016-0255-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-016-0255-4