Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modelling of Codling Moth Damage as a Function of Adult Monitoring, Crop Protection and Other Orchard Characteristics

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The codling moth, the major insect pest in apple and pear orchards, is responsible for most insecticide treatments in European and North American orchards. Despite the intensive insecticide pressure, the codling moth remains a concern for fruit growers and can have a locally dramatic impact on production. To reduce pesticide use, there is a need to better determine the factors that affect the level of damage in orchards. The number of damaged fruits at the end of the codling moth’s first flight in pomefruit commercial orchards quantifies the severity of the attack. However, this variable sums the unobserved damages that occurred throughout this period, depending on a damage risk process that is likely driven by time-dependent and observable covariates. Moreover, as in most ecological/epidemiological studies, the data sets are incomplete and heterogeneous. The statistical challenge here is to build a sensible stochastic model to handle grouped and various data sets that are both right- and left-censored. In this paper, we model the temporal damage risk by combining survival methods with generalised linear mixed models to account for a time varying regression analysis. The results indicate that adult trapping provides useful information on the local level of fruit damages. Unexpectedly, the number of insecticide treatments did not appear to be a significant covariate for fruit damage modelling. The significance of the random component of the model indicates that a substantial portion of the variation in fruit damage remains, demanding further investigation concerning other relevant agronomic and environmental covariates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Andersen, P.K., Borgan, O., Gill, R.D., Keiding, N. (1993). Statistical Models Based On Counting Processes. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Akaike, H. (1974), “A new look at the statistical model identification”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Asser-Kaiser S., Fritsch E., Undorf-Spahn K., Kienzle J., Eberle K. E. et al. (2007) “Rapid emergence of baculovirus resistance in codling moth due to dominant, sex-linked inheritance”, Science 317, 1916–1918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R. (1972), “Regression Models and Life Tables (with Discussion)”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 34, 187–200.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ducrocq, V., Casella, G. (1996), “A Bayesian analysis of mixed survival models”, Genetics Selection Evolution, 28, 505–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farewell, V.T. (1986), “Mixture models in survival analysis: Are they worth the risk?”, Canadian Journal of Statistics, 14, 257–262.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kachman, S.D. (1999), “Application in Survival analysis”, Journal of Animal Science, 77, 147–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, A., Light, D. (2005), “Developing action thresholds for codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with pear ester-and codlemone-baited traps in apple orchards treated with sex pheromone mating disruption”, Canadian Entomologist, 137, 739–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lele, S.R., Dennis B., and Lutscher F. (2007), “Data cloning: easy maximum likelihood estimation for complex ecological models using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo methods”, Ecology Letters 10, 551–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly, B.F.J. (1991). Randomization Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McGilchrist, C.A. (1993), “REML estimation for survival models with friability”, Biometrics, 49, 221– 225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, C.E., Searle, S.R. (2001). Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models. Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Miliczky, E.R., Horton, D.R. (2005), “Densities of beneficial arthropods within pear and apple orchards affected by distance from adjacent native habitat and association of natural enemies with extra-orchards host plants”, Biological Control, 33, 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, S., Lello, J. (2003), “Mixed models: getting the best use of parasitological data”, Trends in Parasitology, 19, 370–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuveny, H., Cohen, E. (2007), “Toxicity of azinphos-methyl to various development stages of the codling moth Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)”, Pest Managment Science, 63, 129–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, M., Franck, P., Charmillot, P.J., Loriatti, C., Olivares, J., Pasqualin, E., Sauphanor, B. (2007), “Diversity of insecticide resistance mechanisms and spectrum in European populations of the codling moth, Cydia pomonella”, Pest Managment Science, 63, 890–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricci, B., Franck, P., Toubon, J.-F., Bouvier, J.-C., Sauphanor, B., Lavigne, C. (2009), “The influence of landscape on insect pest dynamics: a case study in southeastern France”, Landscape Ecology, 24, 337–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, H., Croft, B.A. (1974), ”A study of pheromone trap catches in relation to codling moth (Lepidopterae: Olethreutidae) damage”, Canadian Entomologist, 106, 525–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherm, H., Ojiambo, P.S. (2004), “Applications of survival analysis in botanical epidemiology”, Phytopathology, 94, 1022–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, S., Casella, G., McCulloch, C. (1992). Variance Component. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T., Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modelling. Sage, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southey, B.R., Rodriguez-Zas, S.L., Leymaster, K.A. (2003), “Discrete time survival analysis of lamb mortality in a terminal sire composite population”, Journal of Animal Science, 81, 1399–1405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valantin-Morison, M., Meynard, J.M., Dore, T. (2007), “Effects of crop management and surrounding field environment on insect incidence in organic winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.)”, Crop Protection, 26, 1108-1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wintrebert, C.M.A., Zwinderman, A.H., Cam, E., Pradel, R., Van Houwelingen, J.C. (2005), “Joint modelling of breeding and survival in the kittiwake using frailty models”, Ecological Modelling, 181, 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, J.G., Moser, D., Drapela, T., Schmoger, C., Frank, T. (2008), ”Effect of within-field and landscape factors on insect damage in winter oilseed rape”, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 123, 233-238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Martin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martin, O., Ricci, B., Franck, P. et al. Modelling of Codling Moth Damage as a Function of Adult Monitoring, Crop Protection and Other Orchard Characteristics. JABES 19, 419–436 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-014-0181-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-014-0181-2

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Pierre Franck