Abstract
Trials in the early stages of selection are often subject to variation arising from spatial variability and interplot competition, which can seriously bias the assessment of varietal performance and reduce genetic progress. An approach to jointly model both sources of bias is presented. It models genotypic and residual competition and also global and extraneous spatial variation. Variety effects were considered random and residual maximum likelihood was used for parameter estimation. Competition at the residual level was examined using two special simultaneous autoregressive models. An equal-roots second-order autoregressive (EAR(2)) model is proposed for trials where competition is dominant. An equal-roots third-order autoregressive (EAR(3)) model allows for competition and spatial variability. These models are applied to two yield data sets from an Australian sugarcane selection program. One data set is in the paper and the other is in supplementary material available online. To determine the effect of simultaneously adjusting for spatial variability and interplot competition on selection, the percentages of superior varieties in common in the top 15% for the joint model and classical approaches were compared. Agreement between the two approaches was 45 and 84%. Hence, for some trials there are large differences in varieties advanced to the next stage of selection.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Besag, J., and Kempton, R. (1986), “Statistical Analysis of Field Experiments Using Neighbouring Plots,” Biometrics, 42, 231–251.
Bradshaw, J. E. (1989), “Inter-Plot Competition in Yield Trials of Swedes (Brassica napus ssp. rapifers L.),” Euphytica, 42, 135–140.
Butler, D. G., Cullis, B. R., Gilmour, A. R., and Gogel, B. J. (2009), “ASReml-R Reference Manual, Release 3,” Technical report, Brisbane, Queensland.
Cappa, E., and Cantet, R. (2008), “Direct and Competition Additive Effects in Tree Breeding: Bayesian Estimation From an Individual Tree Mixed Model,” Silvae Genetica, 57, 45–56.
Connolly, T., Currie, I. D., Bradshaw, J. E., and McNicol, J. W. (1993), “Inter-Plot Competition in Yield Trials of Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) With Single-Drill Plots,” Annals of Applied Biology, 123, 367–377.
Cullis, B., Gogel, B., Verbyla, A., and Thompson, R. (1998), “Spatial Analysis of Multi-Environment Early Generation Variety Trials,” Biometrics, 54, 1–18.
Cullis, B. R., Smith, A. B., and Coombes, N. E. (2006), “On the Design of Early Generation Variety Trials With Correlated Errors,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental, Statistics, 11, 381–393.
David, O., and Kempton, R. A. (1996), “Designs for Interference,” Biometrics, 52, 597–606.
Draper, N. R., and Guttman, I. (1980), “Incorporating Overlap Effects From Neighbouring Units Into Response Surface Models,” Applied Statistics, 29, 128–134.
Durban, M., Currie, I. D., and Kempton, R. A. (2001), “Adjusting for Fertility and Competition in Variety Trials,” Journal of Agricultural Science, 136, 129–140.
Dutkowski, G. W., Silva, J. C. E., Gilmour, A. R., and Lopez, G. A. (2002), “Spatial Analysis Methods for Forest Genetic Trials,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 32, 2201–2214.
Federer, W. T. (1956), “Augmented (or Hoonuiaku) Designs,” The Hawaiian Planters’ Record, 55, 191–208.
Gilmour, A. R., Cullis, B. R., and Verbyla, A. P. (1997), “Accounting for Natural and Extraneous Variation in the Analysis of Field Experiments,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 2, 269–293.
Grondona, M. O., Crossa, J., Fox, P. N., and Pfeiffer, W. H. (1996), “Analysis of Variety Yield Trials Using Two-Dimensional Separable ARIMA Processes,” Biometrics, 52, 763–770.
Kempton, R. A. (1982), “Adjustment for Competition Between Varieties in Plant Breeding Trials,” Journal of Agricultural Science, 98, 599–611.
Kempton, R. A., and Lockwood, G. (1984), “Inter-Plot Competition in Variety Trials of Field Beans (Vicia faba L.),” Journal of Agricultural Science, 103, 293–302.
Martin, R. J. (1998), “Optimal Designs for Small-Sized Blocks Under Dependence,” Journal of Combinatorics, Information and System Sciences, 23, 95–124.
Matassa, V. (2003), “Optimisation of Experimental Design and Analysis for Sugarcane Variety Trials,” Ph.D. thesis, School of Land and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland.
McCullagh, P., and Tibshirani, R. (1990), “A Simple Method for the Adjustment of Profile Likelihoods,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 52, 325–344.
Oakey, H., Verbyla, A. P., Cullis, B. R., Wei, X., and Pitchford, W. S. (2007), “Joint Modeling of Additive and Non-additive (Genetic Line) Effects in Multi-Environment Trials,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 114, 1319–1332.
Pearce, S. C. (1957), “Experimenting With Organisms as Blocks,” Biometrika, 44, 141–149.
Qiao, C. G., Basford, K. E., Delacy, I. H., and Cooper, M. (2000), “Evaluation of Experimental Designs and Analyses in Wheat Breeding Trials,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 100, 9–16.
Silva, J. C. E., Dutkowski, G. W., and Gilmour, A. R. (2001), “Analysis of Early Tree Height in Forest Genetic Trials is Enhanced by Including a Spatially Correlated Residual,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31, 1887–1893.
Smith, A. B. (1999), “Multiplicative Mixed Models for the Analysis of Multi-Environment Trial Data,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Statistics, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide.
Stefanova, K. T., Smith, A. B., and Cullis, B. R. (2009), “Enhanced Diagnostics for the Spatial Analysis of Field Trials,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 14, 392–410.
Stram, D. O., and Lee, J. W. (1994), “Variance Components Testing in the Longitudinal Mixed Effects Setting,” Biometrics, 50, 1171–1177.
Stringer, J. K. (2006), “Joint Modelling of Spatial Variability and Interplot Competition to Improve the Efficiency of Plant Improvement,” Ph.D. thesis, The University of Queensland.
Stringer, J. K., and Cullis, B. R. (2002), “Application of Spatial Analysis Techniques to Adjust for Fertility Trends and Identify Interplot Competition in Early Stage Sugarcane Selection Trials,” Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 53, 911–918.
Talbot, M., Milner, A. D., Nutkins, M. A. E., and Law, J. R. (1995), “Effect of Interference Between Plots on Yield Performance in Crop Variety Trials,” Journal of Agricultural Science, 124, 335–342.
Thompson, R., Cullis, B., Smith, A., and Gilmour, A. (2003), “A Sparse Implementation of the Average Information Algorithm for Factor Analytic and Reduced Rank Variance Models,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 45, 445–459.
Verbyla, A. P., Cullis, B. R., Kenward, M. G., and Welham, S. J. (1999), “The Analysis of Designed Experiments and Longitudinal Data by Using Smoothing Splines,” Applied Statistics, 48, 269–311.
Williams, E. J. (1952), “Experimental Designs for Serially Correlated Observations,” Biometrika, 39, 152–167.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stringer, J.K., Cullis, B.R. & Thompson, R. Joint Modeling of Spatial Variability and Within-Row Interplot Competition to Increase the Efficiency of Plant Improvement. JABES 16, 269–281 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-010-0051-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-010-0051-5