Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Olfactometer experiments are used to study the responses of arthropods to potential attractants, for purposes such as understanding natural defenses of plants against their herbivores. Such experiments typically lead to multivariate data consisting of small correlated counts, which are overdispersed relative to standard models. In this paper models that account for the overdispersion under different hypotheses on insect behavior are described and illustrated with an example, and a graphical approach to discriminating among them is briefly discussed.

Supplementary files giving technical computations, data and code are available online.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben Akiva, M., Lerman, S., and Akiva, B. (1985), Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R., and Miller, H. D. (1965), The Theory of Stochastic Processes, London: Chapman & Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • D’Alessandro, M., and Turlings, T. C. J. (2006), “Advances and Challenges in the Identification of Volatiles That Mediate Interactions Among Plants and Arthropods,” The Analyst, 131, 24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, A. C. (2003), Statistical Models, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Garrow, L. A. (2010), Discrete Choice Modelling and Air Travel Demand: Theory and Applications, Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. L., and Meier, P. (1958), “Nonparametric Estimation From Incomplete Observations,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53, 457–481.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P., and Nelder, J. A. (1989), Generalized Linear Models (2nd ed.), London: Chapman & Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mosimann, J. E. (1962), “On the Compound Multinomial Distribution, the Multivariate Beta Distribution, and Correlations Among Proportions,” Biometrika, 49, 65–82.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmann, S., Köllner, T. G., Degenhardt, J., Hiltpold, I., Töpfer, S., Kuhlmann, U., Gershenzon, J., and Turlings, T. C. J. (2005), “Recruitment of Entomopathogenic Nematodes by Insect-Damaged Maize Roots,” Nature, 434, 732–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricard, I. (2008), “Statistical Methods for Insect Choice Experiments”, Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland.

  • Ricard, I., and Davison, A. C. (2007), “Statistical Inference for Olfactometer Data,” Applied Statistics, 56, 479–492.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, B. D. (1987), Stochastic Simulation, New York: Wiley.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M., Gerard, K., and Amaya-Amaya, M. (eds.) (2008), Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care, Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamò, C., Ricard, I., Held, M., Davison, A. C., and Turlings, T. C. J. (2006), “A Comparison of Naive and Conditioned Responses of Three Generalist Endoparasitoids of Lepidopteran Larvae to Host-Induced Plant Odours,” Animal Biology, 56, 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Train, K. (2009), Discrete Choice Models with Simulation (2nd ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turlings, T. C. J., Davison, A. C., and Tamò, C. (2004), “A Six-Arm Olfactometer Permitting Simultaneous Observation of Insect Attraction and Odour Trapping,” Physiological Entomology, 29, 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turlings, T. C. J., Loughrin, J. H., Röse, U., McCall, P. J., Lewis, W. J., and Tumlinson, J. H. (1995), “How Caterpillar-Damaged Plants Protect Themselves by Attracting Parasitic Wasps,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 92, 4169–4174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaida, F., and Blanchard, S. (2005), “Conditional Akaike Information for Mixed-Effects Models,” Biometrika, 92, 351–370.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. C. Davison.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 82 kB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davison, A.C., Ricard, I. Comparison of Models for Olfactometer Data. JABES 16, 157–169 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-010-0042-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-010-0042-6

Key Words

Navigation