Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating Population Growth Rate From Capture–Recapture Data in Presence of Capture Heterogeneity

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The direct estimation and modeling of population growth rate from capture–recapture data has now seen a number of applications. However, the original model cannot accommodate heterogeneous capture probabilities. While studying a population of small mammals Peromyscus maniculatus, we became concerned that the peak of population size may be estimated too late in the year because of heterogeneous catchability. Hence, we developed a variation of the original model with a finite number of catchability classes. The results obtained with the new model are more in agreement with the known biology of this population. A bibliographic appendix and computer code are available online.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthony, R. G., Forsman, E. D., Franklin, A. B., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., White, G. C., Schwarz, C. J., Nichols, J. D., Hines, J. E., Olson, G. S., Ackers, S. H., Andrews, L. S., Biswell, B. L., Carlson, P. C., Diller, L. V., Dugger, K. M., Fehring, K. E., Fleming, T. L., Gerhardt, R. P., Gremel, S. A., Gutierrez, R. J., Happe, P. J., Herter, D. R., Higley, J. M., Horn, R. B., Irwin, L. L., Loschl, P. J., Reid, J. A., and Sovern, S. G. (2006), “Status and Trends in Demography of Northern Spotted Owls, 1985–2003,” Wildlife Monographs, 163, 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carothers, A. (1973), “The Effects of Unequal Catchability on Jolly–Seber Estimates,” Biometrics, 29, 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1979), “Quantifying Unequal Catchability and Its Effects on Survival Estimates in an Actual Population,” Journal of Animal Ecology, 48, 863–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, H. (2001), Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis and Interpretation (2nd ed.), Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choquet, R., Lebreton, J.-D., Gimenez, O., Reboulet, A.-M., and Pradel, R. (2009), “U-CARE: Utilities for Performing Goodness of Fit Tests and Manipulating CApture–REcapture Data,” Ecography, in press.

  • Courtney, S., Blakesley, J., Bigley, R., Cody, M., Dumbacher, J., Fleischer, R., Franklin, A. B., Franklin, J., Gutiérrez, R., Marzluff, J., and Sztukowski, L. (2004), “Scientific Evaluation of the Status of the Northern Spotted Owl, ” scientific report, Sustainable Ecosystems Institute, Portland, OR.

  • Crespin, L., Choquet, R., Lima, M. A., Merritt, J. F., and Pradel, R. (2008), “Is Heterogeneity of Catchability in Capture–Recapture Studies a Mere Sampling Artifact or a Biologically Relevant Feature of the Population?” Population Ecology, 50, 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efford, M. (1998), “Demographic Consequences of Sex-Biased Dispersal in a Population of Brushtail Possums,” Journal of Animal Ecology, 67, 503–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, A. B., Burnham, K. P., White, G. C., Anthony, R. G., Forsman, E. D., Schwarz, C., Nichols, J. D., and Hines, J. E. (1999), Range-Wide Status and Trends in Northern Spotted Owl Populations, Portland, OR: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, A. B., Gutiérrez, R. J., Nichols, J. D., Seamans, M. E., White, G. C., Zimmerman, G. S., Hines, J. E., Munton, T. E., LaHaye, W. S., Blakesley, J. A., Steger, G. N., Noon, B. R., Shaw, D. W. H., Keane, J. J., McDonald, T. L., and Susan, B. (2004), “Population Dynamics of the California Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis): A Meta-Analysis,” Ornithological Monographs, 54, 1–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, E. L., and Anthony, R. G. (2006), “Mark–Recapture Estimates of Population Parameters for Selected Species of Small Mammals,” Journal of Mammalogy, 87, 618–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, J. E., and Nichols, J. D. (2002), “Investigations of Potential Bias in the Estimation of Lambda Using Pradel’s (1996) Model for Capture–Recapture Data,” Journal of Applied Statistics, 29, 573–587.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, G. (1965), “Explicit Estimates From Capture–Recapture Data With Both Death and Immigration-Stochastic Model,” Biometrika, 52, 225–247.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Link, W. A. (2003), “Nonidentifiability of Population Size From Capture–Recapture Data With Heterogeneous Detection Probabilities,” Biometrics, 59, 1123–1130.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, P. J. (1996), Life in the Cold: An Introduction to Winter Ecology, Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, J. F. (1984), “Growth Patterns and Seasonal Thermogenesis of Clethrionomys gapperi Inhabiting the Appalachian and Rocky Mountains of North America,” in Winter Ecology of Small Mammals, ed. J. F. Merritt, Pittsburg, PA: Carnegie Museum of Natural History, pp. 201–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1987), Guide to the Mammals of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, J. F., and Merritt, J. M. (1980), “Population Ecology of the Deer Mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) in the Front Range of Colorado,” Annals of Carnegie Museum, 49, 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostfeld, R. S., and Canham, C. D. (1995), “Density-Dependent Processes in Meadow Voles, an Experimental Approach,” Ecology, 76, 521–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pledger, S. (2000), “Unified Maximum Likelihood Estimates for Closed Capture–Recapture Models Using Mixtures,” Biometrics, 56, 434–442.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pledger, S., Pollock, K. H., and Norris, J. L. (2003), “Open Capture–Recapture Models With Heterogeneity: I. Cormack–Jolly–Seber Model,” Biometrics, 59, 786–794.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K. H., Hines, J. E., and Nichols, J. D. (1985), “Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Open Capture–Recapture Models,” Biometrics, 41, 399–410.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pradel, R. (1993), “Flexibility in Survival Analysis From Recapture Data: Handling Trap-Dependence,” in Marked Individuals in the Study of Bird Population, eds. J.-D. Lebreton and P. M. North, Basel, Switzerland: Birkhaüser, pp. 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1996), “Utilization of Capture–Mark–Recapture for the Study of Recruitment and Population Growth Rate,” Biometrics, 52, 703–709.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (2005), “Multievent: An Extension of Multistate Capture–Recapture Models to Uncertain States,” Biometrics, 61, 442–447.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (2009), “The Stakes of Capture–Recapture Models With State Uncertainty,” in Modeling Demographic Processes in Marked Populations. Environmental and Ecological Statistics Series, Vol. 3, eds. D. L. Thomson, E. G. Cooch, and M. J. Conroy, Berlin: Springer, pp. 781–795.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pradel, R., and Henry, P.-Y. (2007), “Potential Contributions of Capture–Recapture to the Estimation of Population Growth Rate in Restoration Projects,” Ecoscience, 14, 432–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradel, R., Hines, J. E., Lebreton, J.-D., and Nichols, J. D. (1997), “Capture–Recapture Survival Models Taking Account of Transients,” Biometrics, 53, 60–72.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rotella, J. J., and Hines, J. E. (2005), “Effects of Tag Loss on Direct Estimates of Population Growth Rate,” Ecology, 86, 821–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandercock, B. K. (2006), “Estimation of Demographic Parameters From Live-Encounter Data: A Summary Review,” Journal of Wildlife Management, 70, 1504–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G. (1965), “A Note on the Multiple-Recapture Census,” Biometrika, 52, 249–259.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger Pradel.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pradel, R., Choquet, R., Lima, M.A. et al. Estimating Population Growth Rate From Capture–Recapture Data in Presence of Capture Heterogeneity. JABES 15, 248–258 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-009-0008-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-009-0008-8

Key Words

Navigation