Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of dosimetric leaf gap correction factor in Mobius3D commissioning affected by couch top

  • Scientific Paper
  • Published:
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study assesses the dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) correction factor in Mobius3D commissioning affected by a couch top platform and calculates the optimal DLG value according to the point dose difference function. DLG optimizations were performed for 3 LINAC machines and a total of 30 patient volumetric modulated arc therapy plans (i.e., 10 plans per each LINAC). Point dose calculations were performed using an automatic dose calculation system in Mobius3D as well as Mobis3D calculation using a Mobius Verification Phantom (MVP)-based quality assurance plan with a carbon fiber couch top. Subsequently, the results were compared with measurement data. The averaged point dose measured for the MVP with a couch top decreased by approximately 2% relative to that without the couch top. The average of the optimal DLG factors increased by 1.153 mm due to the couch top effect for a dose decrease of 2% at the measured point. In the procedure of Mobius beam commissioning, users should adjust the DLG correction factor using a specific phantom (including MVP) with a couch top structure. If the DLG optimization were performed by using MVP automatic dose calculation system, the factor should be increased by approximately 1.2 mm per 2% dose difference considering user’s couch top effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Neilson C, Klein M, Barnett R, Yartsev S (2013) Delivery quality assurance with ArcCHECK. Med Dosim 38:77–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2012.07.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fakir H, Gaede S, Mulligan M, Chen JZ (2012) Development of a novel ArcCHECK™ insert for routine quality assurance of VMAT delivery including dose calculation with inhomogeneities. Med Phys 39:4203–4208. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4728222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Feygelman V, Forster K, Opp D, Nilsson G (2009) Evaluation of a biplanar diode array dosimeter for quality assurance of step-and-shoot IMRT. J Appl Clin Med Phys 10:3080. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i4.3080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bedford JL, Lee YK, Wai P, South CP, Warrington AP (2009) Evaluation of the Delta4 phantom for IMRT and VMAT verification. Phys Med Biol 54:N167–N176. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/54/9/N04

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Richardson SL, Tomé WA, Orton NP, McNutt TR, Paliwal BR (2003) IMRT delivery verification using a spiral phantom. Med Phys 30:2553–2558. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1603965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jursinic PA, Sharma R, Reuter J (2010) MapCHECK used for rotational IMRT measurements: step-and-shoot, Tomotherapy, RapidArc. Med Phys 37:2837–2846. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3431994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Létourneau D, Publicover J, Kozelka J, Moseley DJ, Jaffray DA (2009) Novel dosimetric phantom for quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy. Med Phys 36:1813–1821. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3117563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Siochi RAC, Molineu A, Orton CG (2013) Point/Counterpoint. Patient-specific QA for IMRT should be performed using software rather than hardware methods. Med Phys 40:070601. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4794929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jolly D, Dunn L, Kenny J (2017) A clinical database to assess action levels and tolerances for the ongoing use of Mobius3D. J Appl Clin Med Phys 18:59–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nelson CL, Mason BE, Robinson RC, Kisling KD, Kirsner SM (2014) Commissioning results of an automated treatment planning verification system. J Appl Clin Med Phys 15:4838. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i5.4838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Song JY, Jeong JU, Yoon MS, Ahn SJ, Chung WK, Nam TK (2017) Dosimetric evaluation of MobiusFX in the RapidArc delivery quality assurance comparing with 3DVH. PLoS ONE 12:e0183165. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Clemente-Gutiérrez F, Pérez-Vara C (2015) Dosimetric validation and clinical implementation of two 3D dose verification systems for quality assurance in volumetric-modulated arc therapy techniques. J Appl Clin Med Phys 16:5190. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.5190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kadoya N, Kon Y, Takayama Y, Matsumoto T, Hayashi N, Katsuta Y, Ito K, Chiba T, Dobashi S, Takeda K, Jingu K (2018) Quantifying the performance of two different types of commercial software programs for 3D patient dose reconstruction for prostate cancer patients: machine log files vs. machine log files with EPID images. Phys Med 45:170–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.12.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McDonald DG, Jacqmin DJ, Mart CJ, Koch NC, Peng JL, Ashenafi MS, Fugal MA, Vanek KN (2017) Validation of a modern second-check dosimetry system using a novel verification phantom. J Appl Clin Med Phys 18:170–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12025

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Au IW, Ciurlionis L, Campbell N, Goodwin D (2017) Validation of the Mobius system for patient-specific quality assurance using introduced intentional errors. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 40:181–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-016-0503-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Olch AJ, Gerig L, Li H, Mihaylov I, Morgan A (2014) Dosimetric effects caused by couch tops and immobilization devices: report of AAPM Task Group 176. Med Phys 41:061501. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4876299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith DW, Christophides D, Dean C, Naisbit M, Mason J, Morgan A (2010) Dosimetric characterization of the iBEAM evo carbon fiber couch for radiotherapy. Med Phys 37:3595–3606. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3451114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McCormack S, Diffey J, Morgan A (2005) The effect of gantry angle on megavoltage photon beam attenuation by a carbon fiber couch insert. Med Phys 32:483–487. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1852792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahn S, Park K, Kim J, Lee H, Yoon J, Lee E, Park S, Park J, Kim J, Keum KC (2016) An empirical approach to dosimetric effect of carbon fiber couch for flattening filter free beam of elekta LINAC. Prog Med Phys 27:220–223. https://doi.org/10.14316/pmp.2016.27.4.220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Savini A, Bartolucci F, Fidanza C, Rosica F, Orlandi G (2016) Modeling of couch transmission in the RayStation treatment planning system. Phys Med 32:735–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.04.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. De Puysseleyr A, De Neve W, De Wagter C (2016) A patient immobilization device for prone breast radiotherapy: dosimetric effects and inclusion in the treatment planning system. Phys Med 32:758–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.04.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. System MM (2017). Mobius 3d User Guide (version 2.1.0 Rev 1.0)

  23. Kim J, Han MC, Lee E, Park K, Chang KH, Kim DW, Kim JS, Hong CS (2020) Detailed evaluation of Mobius3D dose calculation accuracy for volumetric-modulated arc therapy. Phys Med 74:125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.05.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Radiation Technology R&D program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (Project No.: NRF-2015M3A9E2067001, NRF-2020R1A4A1016619, NRF-2020R1C1C1005713).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception, design, and drafting the manuscript were performed by M.C. Han, J. Kim, C-S. Hong, K. H. Chang, S. C. Han, K. Park, D. W. Kim, and J. S. Kim Data collection and interpretation were performed by M. C. Han, M. K. Park, and Y. Y. Noh, C-S. Hong, and J. S. Kim. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chae-Seon Hong or Jin Sung Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, M.C., Kim, J., Hong, CS. et al. Assessment of dosimetric leaf gap correction factor in Mobius3D commissioning affected by couch top. Phys Eng Sci Med 43, 1069–1075 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-020-00905-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-020-00905-z

Keywords

Navigation