Abstract
Gafchromic EBT3 film is widely used for patient specific quality assurance of complex treatment plans. Film dosimetry techniques commonly involve the use of transmission scanning to produce TIFF files, which are analysed using a non-linear calibration relationship between the dose and red channel net optical density (netOD). Numerous film calibration techniques featured in the literature have not been independently verified or evaluated. A range of previously published film dosimetry techniques were re-evaluated, to identify whether these methods produce better results than the commonly-used non-linear, netOD method. EBT3 film was irradiated at calibration doses between 0 and 4000 cGy and 25 pieces of film were irradiated at 200 cGy to evaluate uniformity. The film was scanned using two different scanners: The Epson Perfection V800 and the Epson Expression 10000XL. Calibration curves, uncertainty in the fit of the curve, overall uncertainty and uniformity were calculated following the methods described by the different calibration techniques. It was found that protocols based on a conventional film dosimetry technique produced results that were accurate and uniform to within 1%, while some of the unconventional techniques produced much higher uncertainties (> 25% for some techniques). Some of the uncommon methods produced reliable results when irradiated to the standard treatment doses (< 400 cGy), however none could be recommended as an efficient or accurate replacement for a common film analysis technique which uses transmission scanning, red colour channel analysis, netOD and a non-linear calibration curve for measuring doses up to 4000 cGy when using EBT3 film.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Niroomand-Rad A, Blackwell CR, Coursey BM, Gall KP, Galvin JM, Galvin WL, McLaughlin WL, Meigooni AS, Nath R, Rodgers JE, Soares CG (1998) Radiochromic film dosimetry: recommendations of the AAPM radiation therapy committee task group 55. Med Phys 25(11):2093–2115
Ashland (2017) Gafchromic dosimetry media—type EBT-3. http://www.gafchromic.com/documents/EBT3_Specifications.pdf Accessed 9 Aug 2016
Micke A, Lewis DF, Yu X (2011) Multichannel film dosimetry with nonuniformity correction. Med Phys 35(5):2523–2534
Van Hoof SJ, Granton PV, Landry G, Podesta M, Verhaegen F (2012) Evaluation of a novel triple-channel radiochromic film analysis procedure using EBT2. Phys Med Biol 57:4353–4368
Butson E, Alnawaf H, Yu PKN, Butson M (2011) Scanner uniformity improvements for radiochromic film analysis with matt reflectance backing. Australas Phys Sci Eng Med 34:401–407
Reinhardt S, Hillbrand M, Wilkens JJ, Assmann W (2012) Comparison of Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3 films for clinical photon and proton beams. Med Phys 39(8):5257–5265
International Speciality Products (2011) Gafchromic EBT3. http://www.ashland.com/Ashland/Static/Documents/ASI/Advanced%20Materials/gafchromic-ebt3.pdf. Accessed 9 Aug 2016
Aland T, Kairn T, Kenny J (2011) Evaluation of a Gafchromic EBT2 film dosimetry system for radiotherapy quality assurance. Australas Phys Sci Eng Med 34:251–260
Lynch BD, Kozelka J, Ranade MK, Li JG, Simon WE, Dempsey JF (2006) Important considerations for radiochromic film dosimetry with flatbed CCD scanners and EBT Gafchromic film. Med Phys 33(12):4551–4556
Devic S, Soares CG, Kirov AS, Ali I, Williamson F, Elizondo A (2004) Dosimetric properties of improved Gafchromic films for seven different digitizers. Med Phys 31(9):2392–2401
Martiskova M, Ackerman B, Jakel O (2008) Analysis of uncertainties in Gafchromic EBT film dosimetry of photon beams. Phys Med Biol 53:7013–7027
Devic S, Seuntjens J, Sham E, Podgorsak EB, Schmidtlein CR, Kirov AS, Soares CG (2005) Precise radiochromic film dosimetry using a flat-bed document scanner. Med Phys 32:2245–2253
Kairn T, Aland T (2012) Calibration of radiochromic film for electron radiotherapy dosimetry. IFMBE Proc 39:1153–1156
Moylan R, Aland T, Kairn T (2013) Dosimetric accuracy of Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3 film for in vivo dosimetry. Australas Phys Sci Eng Med 36:331–337
Warrener K, Hug B, Liu P, Ralston A, Ebert MA, McKenzie D, Suchowerska N (2014) Small field in-air output factors: the role of miniphantom design and dosimeter type. J Med Phys 41:21723–21728
Wen N, Lu S, Kim J, Qin Y, Huang Y, Zhao B, Liu C, Chetty IJ (2016) Precise film dosimetry for stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy quality assurance using Gafchromic EBT3 films. Radiat Oncol 11(132)
Hu Y, Wang Y, Fogerty G, Liu G (2013) Developing a novel method to analyse Gafchromic EBT2 films in intensity modulated radiation therapy quality assurance. Australas Phys Sci Eng Med 36:487–494
Yao T, Luthjens LH, Gasparini A, Warman JM (2017) A study of four radiochromic films currently used for (2D) radiation dosimetry. Radiat Phys Chem 133:37–44
Tamponi M, Bona R, Poggiu A, Marini P (2016) A new form of the calibration curve in radiochromic dosimetry, properties and results. Med Phys 43(7):4435–4446
Bennie N, Metcalfe P (2015) Practical IMRT QA dosimetry using Gafchromic film: a quick start guide. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 39:533–545
Kairn T, Aland T, Kenny J (2010) Local heterogeneities in early batches of EBT2 film: a suggested solution. Phys Med Biol 55:37–42
Devic S, Tomic N, Lewis D (2016) Reference radiochromic film dosimetry: review of technical aspects. Phys Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.02.008
Peet S, Wilks R, Kairn T, Trapp JV, Crowe SB (2016) Calibrating radiochromic film in beams of uncertain quality. Med Phys 43(10):5647–5652
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spelleken, E., Crowe, S.B., Sutherland, B. et al. Accuracy and efficiency of published film dosimetry techniques using a flat-bed scanner and EBT3 film. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 41, 117–128 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-018-0620-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-018-0620-4