A survey of modulated radiotherapy use in Australia & New Zealand in 2015
- 163 Downloads
A survey of radiation oncology medical physics departments across Australia and New Zealand was conducted to assess the usage, commissioning and quality assurance of modulated radiotherapy techniques such as IMRT and VMAT. Survey responses were collected in April–May 2015 to snapshot current practice and historical implementation. The survey asked 142 questions, and is the most detailed survey of its kind published to date. Analysis of results at overall department level, as well as sub-analysis for different equipment and techniques in use, was performed. Results show a high prevalence of IMRT and VMAT in use, and demonstrate the large heterogeneity in clinical practice and experience across the region.
KeywordsIMRT VMAT Modulated therapy
Many thanks to the members of the NSW/ACT branch committee of the ACPSEM for their help in the development of the survey over several years. The survey data was used to plan an IMRT workshop in Wollongong 2015, and the authors appreciated the valuable discussions from workshop participants.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 2.The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists—Faculty of Radiation Oncology Board (2012) Position Paper: Techniques and Technologies 2015 HORIZON SCAN AUSTRALIAGoogle Scholar
- 4.Nutting CM, Morden JP, Harrington KJ, Urbano TG, Bhide SA, Clark C, Miles EA, Miah AB, Newbold K, Tanay M, Adab F, Jefferies SJ, Scrase C, Yap BK, A’Hern RP, Sydenham MA, Emson M, Hall E (2011) Parotid-sparing intensity modulated versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer (PARSPORT): a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 12(2):127–136CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 7.Ezzell GA, Burmeister JW, Dogan N, LoSasso TJ, Mechalakos JG, Mihailidis D, Molineu A, Palta JR, Ramsey CR, Salter BJ, Shi J, Xia P, Yue NJ, Xiao Y (2009) IMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119. Med Phys 36(11):5359–5373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Ezzell GA, Galvin JM, Low D, Palta JR, Rosen I, Sharpe MB, Xia P, Xiao Y, Xing L, Yu CX (2003) Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee. Med Phys 30(8):2089–2115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.American College of Radiology (2016) ACR practice parameter for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT). https://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PGTS/guidelines/IMRT.pdf
- 11.Nederlandse Commissie Voor Stralingsdosimetrie, N Commissie, V Stralingsdosimetrie, and Nederlandse Commissie Voor Stralingsdosimetrie, “Code of Practice for the Quality Assurance and Control for Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy,” no. June, 2013Google Scholar
- 12.Nederlandse Commissie Voor Stralingsdosimetrie, “Code of Practice for the Quality Assurance and Control for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy,” no. February, p 65, 2015Google Scholar
- 13.Nelms BE, Simon JA (2007) A survey on planar IMRT QA analysis. 8(3):76–90Google Scholar
- 18.RANZCR (2012) Radiation Oncology Tripartite National Strategic Plan 2012–2022Google Scholar
- 20.Van Esch A, Bohsung J, Sorvari P, Tenhunen M, Paiusco M, Iori M, Engström P, Nyström H, Huyskens DP (2002) Acceptance tests and quality control (QC) procedures for the clinical implementation of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using inverse planning and the sliding window technique: experience from five radiotherapy departments. Radiother Oncol 65(1):53–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Ojala JJ, Kapanen MK, Hyödynmaa SJ, Wigren TK, Pitkänen MA (2014) Performance of dose calculation algorithms from three generations in lung SBRT: comparison with full Monte Carlo-based dose distributions. 15(2):4–18Google Scholar
- 28.Nelms BE, Chan MF, Jarry G, Lemire M, Lowden J, Hampton C, Feygelman V, Chan MF, Lowden J, Feygelman V (2013) Evaluating IMRT and VMAT dose accuracy: practical examples of failure to detect systematic errors when applying a commonly used metric and action levels. Med Phys 40(11):111722CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.T. Australian Government Department of Health (2016) 1 January 2016 MBS files [Online] http://www.mbsonline.gov.au/internet/mbsonline/publishing.nsf/Content/news-201601-January-MBS. Accessed 05 Jan 2016