Large differences in monitor units have been observed when RadCalc, a pencil-beam-algorithm based software, is used to verify clinical electron plans from Raystation, a Monte-Carlo-algorithm based planning system. To investigate the problem, a number of clinical plans as well as test plans were created and calculated in both systems, with the resultant monitor units compared. The results revealed that differences between the two systems are significant when the geometry includes inhomogeneities and curved surfaces. The RadCalc pencil-beam-algorithm fails to handle such complexities, particularly in the presence of surface curvature. The error is not negligible and cannot be easily corrected for. It is concluded that RadCalc is not adequate to verify electron Monte Carlo plans from Raystation when complex geometry is involved and alternative methods should be developed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Chetty IJ, Curran B, Cygler JE, DeMarco JJ, Ezzell G, Faddegon BA, Kawrakow I, Keall PJ, Liu H, Ma CM, Rogers DWO, Seuntjens J, Sheikh-Bagheri D, Siebers JV (2007) Report of the AAPM Task Group Report No. 105: issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning. Med Phys 34:4818
Andreo P (1991) Monte Carlo techniques in medical radiation physics. Phys Med Biol 36:861
Ma CM, Jiang SB (1999) Monte Carlo modelling of electron beams from medical accelerators. Phys Med Biol 44:R157
Mzenda B, Mugabe KV, Sims R, Godwin G, Loria D (2014) Modeling and dosimetric performance evaluation of the Raystation treatment planning system. J Appl Clin Med Phys 15(5):29
Fragoso M, Pillai S, Solberg TD, Chetty IJ (2008) Experimental verification and clinical implementation of a commercial Monte Carlo electron beam dose calculation algorithm. Med Phys 35(3):1028
Archibald-Heeren B, Liu G (2016) Raystation Monte Carlo application: evaluation of electron calculations with entry obliquity. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 39:441–452
Kawrakow I (2001) VMC++, electron and photon Monte Carlo calculations optimised for radiation treatment planning. In: Kling A, Barao FJC, Nakagawa M, Tavora L, Vaz P (eds) Advanced Monte Carlo for radiation physics, particle transport simulation and applications: proceedings of the Monte Carlo 2000 conference, Lisbon, 23–26 October 2000. Springer, Berlin, pp 229–236
Gibbons JP, Antolak JA, Followill DS, Huq MS, Klein EE, Lam KL, Palta JR, Roback DM, Reid M, Khan FM (2014) Report of the AAPM Therapy Physics Committee Taks Group No. 71: monitor unit calculations for external photon and electron beams. Med Phys 41(3):031501
Cygler JE, Daskalov G, Chan GH (2004) Evaluation of the first commercial Monte Carlo dose calculation engine for electron beam treatment planning. Med Phys 31:142
Ding GX, Cygler JE, Yu CW, Kalach NI, Daskalov G (2005) A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63(2):622
Edimo P, Clermont C, Kwato MG, Vyncker S (2009) Evaluation of a commercial VMC++ Monte Carlo based treatment planning system for electron beam using EGSnrc/BEAMnrc simulations and measurements. Phys Med 25(3):111
RaySearch Laboratories AB (2014) RayStation5: user manual, version 4.6.073. Stockholm
Khan FM, Doppke KP, Hogstrom KR, Kutcher GJ, Nath R, Prasad SC, Purdy JA, Rozenfeld M, Werner BL (1991) Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 25, clinical electron-beam dosimetry. Med Phys 18(1):73
Jursinic PA, Mueller R (1997) A sector-integration method for calculating the output factors of irregularly shaped electron fields. Med Phys 24:1765
Ding GX, Rogers DWO, Cygler JE, Mackie TR (1997) Electron fluence correction factors for conversion of dose in plastic to dose in water. Med Phys 24:161
Andreo P, Burns DT, Hohlfeld K, Huq MS, Kanai T, Laitano F, Smith VG, Vynckier S (2000) Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: an international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water IAEA Technical Reports Series No. 398. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
Zarza-Moreno M, Carreira P, Madureira L, Miras del Rio H, Salguero FJ, Leal A, Teixeira N, Jesus AP, More G (2014) Dosimetric effect by shallow air cavities in high energy electron beams. Phys Med 30:234
Khan FM (2003) The physics of radiation therapy, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia
Ritenour ER, Cacak RK, Hendee WR (1983) Ionization produced by electron beams beneath curved surfaces. Med Phys 10(5):669
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, Y., Archibald-Heeren, B., Byrne, M. et al. An assessment on the use of RadCalc to verify Raystation Electron Monte Carlo plans. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 39, 735–745 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-016-0470-x
- Monte Carlo
- Pencil beam