Effects of inaccurate small field dose measurements on calculated treatment doses
- 282 Downloads
Given the difficulty and potential time- or financial-costs associated with accurate small field dosimetry, this study aimed to establish the clinical necessity of obtaining accurate small field output factor measurements and to evaluate the effects on planned doses that could arise if accurate measurements are not used in treatment planning dose calculations. Isocentre doses, in heterogeneous patient anatomy, were calculated and compared for 571 beams from 48 clinical radiotherapy treatments, using a clinical radiotherapy treatment planning system, with reference to two different sets of beam configuration data. One set of beam configuration data included field output factors (total scatter factors) from precisely positioned and response-corrected diode measurements and the other included field output factors measured using a conventional technique that would have been better suited to larger field measurements. Differences between the field output factor measurements made with the two different techniques equated to 14.2 % for the 6 \(\times\) 6 mm\(^2\) field, 1.8 % for the 12 \(\times\) 12 mm\(^2\) field, and less than 0.5 % for the larger fields. This led to isocentre dose differences of up to 3.3 % in routine clinical fields smaller than 9 mm across and and up to 11 % in convoluted fields smaller than 15 mm across. If field widths smaller than 15 mm are used clinically, then accurate measurement (or-remeasurement) of small field output factors in the treatment planning system’s beam data is required in order to achieve dose calculation accuracy within 3 %. If such measurements are not completed, then errors in excess of 10 % may occur if very small, narrow, concave or convoluted treatment fields are used.
KeywordsStereotactic radiosurgery Treatment planning Radiation therapy
Experimental measurements used in this work were obtained with assistance from Greg Pedrazzini, Richard Knight, George Warr and Trent Aland, based on advice provided by Gavin Cranmer-Sargison. This work was supported by the Australian Research Council, the Wesley Research Institute, Premion (Genesis Cancer Care Queensland) and the Queensland University of Technology (QUT), through linkage Grant no. LP110100401.
- 12.Cranmer-Sargison G, Weston S, Evans JA, Sidhu NP, Thwaites DI (2012) Monte Carlo modelling of diode detectors for small field MV photon dosimetry: detector model simplification and the sensitivity of correction factors to source parameterization. Phys Med Biol 57:5141–5153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Kawrakow I (2005) egspp: the EGSnrc C++ class library, NRCC Report PIRS-899, National Research Council of CanadaGoogle Scholar
- 25.Standard Imaging (2013) Exradin Detectors (product brochure), accessible from http://www.standardimaging.com/exradin/micro-ion-chambers/Google Scholar
- 30.Kairn T, Charles P, Crowe SB, Trapp JV (2014) Effects of small field output factors on IMRT optimisation and dose calculation. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 37(1):214–215Google Scholar