Bulk evaluation and comparison of radiotherapy treatment plans for breast cancer
- 227 Downloads
This study provides a bulk, retrospective analysis of 151 breast and chest wall radiotherapy treatment plans, as a small-scale demonstration of the potential breadth and value of the information that may be obtained from clinical data mining. The treatments were planned at three centres belonging to one organisation over a period of 3 months. All 151 plans were used to evaluate inter-centre consistency and compliance with a local planning protocol. A subset of 79 plans, from one centre, were used in a more detailed evaluation of the effects of anatomical asymmetry on heart and lung dose, the effects of a metallic temporary tissue expander port on dose homogeneity and the overall conformity and homogeneity achieved in routine breast treatment planning. Differences in anatomical structure contouring and nomenclature were identified between the three centres, with all centres showing some non-compliance with the local planning protocol. When evaluated against standard conformity indices, these breast plans performed relatively poorly. However, when evaluated against recommended organ-at-risk tolerances, all evaluated plans performed sufficiently well that tighter planning tolerances could be recommended for future planning. Heart doses calculated in left breast and chest wall treatments were significantly higher than heart doses calculated in right sided breast and chest wall treatments (p < 0.001). In the treatment involving a temporary tissue expander, the inflated implant effectively pushed the targeted breast tissue away from the healthy tissues, leading to a dose distribution that was relatively conformal, although attenuation through the tissue expander’s metallic port may have been underestimated by the treatment planning system. The results of this study exemplify the use of bulk treatment planning data to evaluate clinical workloads and inform ongoing treatment planning.
KeywordsTreatment planning Data mining Radiation therapy
This study was supported by the Australian Research Council, the Wesley Research Institute, Genesis Cancer Care Queensland (formerly Premion) and the Queensland University of Technology (QUT), through linkage Grant Number LP110100401.
- 1.Smith FM, Gallagher WM, Fox E, Stephens RB, Rexhepaj E, Petricoin EF 3rd, Liotta L, Kennedy MJ, Reynolds JV (2007) Combination of SELDI-TOF-MS and data mining provides early stage response prediction for rectal tumors undergoing multimodal neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Surg 245(2):259–266CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 6.Beetz I, Schilstra C, Burlage FR, Koken PW, Doornaert P, Bijl HP, Chouvalova O, Leemans CR, de Bock GH, Christianen ME, van der Laan BF (2012) Development of NTCP models for head and neck cancer patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for xerostomia and sticky saliva: the role of dosimetric and clinical factors. Radiother Oncol 105(1):86–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Maggio A, Carillo V, Cozzarini C, Perna L, Rancati T, Valdagni R, Gabriele P, Fiorino C (2013) Impact of the radiotherapy technique on the correlation between dose-volume histograms of the bladder wall defined on MRI imaging and dose-volume/surface histograms in prostate cancer patients. Phys Med Biol 58(7):N115–N123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Crowe SB, Kairn T, Middlebrook N, Hill B, Christie DR, Knight RT, Kenny J, Langton CM, Trapp JV (2013) Retrospective evaluation of dosimetric quality for prostate carcinomas treated with 3D conformal, intensity modulated and volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy. J Med Radiat Sci 60(4):131–138CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 14.Gintz D, Latifi K, Caudell J, Nelms B, Zhang G, Moros E, Feygelman V (2016) Initial evaluation of automated treatment planning software. J Appl Clin Med Phys 17(3):331–346Google Scholar
- 18.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2014) Australian cancer incidence and mortality (ACIM) books: breast cancer. AIHW, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 19.Landberg T, Chavaudra J, Dobbs H et al (1999) ICRU report 62 prescribing, recording and reporting photon beam therapy (supplement to ICRU report 50). International Commission on Radiotherapy Units and Measurements, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
- 26.Donovan E, Bleakley N, Denholm E, Evans P, Gothard L, Hanson J, Peckitt C, Reise S, Ross G, Sharp G, Symonds-Tayler R (2007) Randomised trial of standard 2D radiotherapy (RT) versus intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients prescribed breast radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 82(3):254–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Hansen EK, Roach M (2007) Handbook of evidence-based radiation oncology. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar