Journal of Remanufacturing

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 75–87 | Cite as

Pricing decisions in closed-loop supply chain with collection-relevant demand

  • Hua Ke
  • Mengsi CaiEmail author


This research deals with pricing decisions in a closed-loop supply chain constituted by a manufacturer, two retailers and the end consumers. The manufacturer is assumed to be the Stackelberg leader while one of the retailers engages in collecting activities. In this paper, we consider collecting activities’ effect on demand expansion. In order to capture the optimal decisions of the supply chain members, two optimization models are built with the first one serving as a benchmark model. The analytical results are derived from the models and some numerical studies are further conducted. The results indicate a free-riding effect, i.e., the collecting activities undertaken by a retailer can also slightly benefit the other retailer that does not engage in collection. Our results also show that, in presence of collecting activities’ effectiveness, the manufacturer is willing to pay a transfer price higher than cost savings in remanufacturing which means the motivation to recycling for manufacturer is the increase of total demand rather than cost-saving from remanufacturing.


Closed-loop supply chain Pricing competition Remanufacturing Supply chain management 



This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.71371141).


  1. 1.
    Anderson E, Bao Y (2010) Price competition with integrated and decentralized supply chains. Eur J Oper Res 200(1):227–234CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atasu A, Toktay L, Van Wassenhove L (2013) How collection cost structure drives a manufacturer’s reverse channel choice. Prod Oper Manag 22(5):1089C1102Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen JM, Chang CI (2012) The co-opetitive strategy of a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 48(2):387–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choi T, Li Y, Xu L (2013) Channel leadership, performance and coordination in closed loop supply chains. Int J Prod Econ 146(1):371–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dowlatshahi S (2000) Developing a theory of reverse logistics. Interfaces 30(3):143–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Esmaeili M, Allameh G, Tajvidi T (2016) Using game theory for analysing pricing models in closed-loop supply chain from short- and long-term perspectives. Int J Prod Res 54(7):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fleischmann M, Beullens P, Bloemhof-Ruwaard J, Van Wassenhove L (2001) The impact of product recovery on logistics network design. Prod Oper Manag 10(2):156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fleischmann M, Van Nunen J, Ve B (2003) Integrating closed-loop supply chains and spare-parts management at IBM. Interfaces 33(6):44–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gao J, Han H, Hou L, Wang H (2015) Pricing and effort decisions in a closed-loop supply chain under different channel power structures. J Clean Prod 112:2043–2057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giri B, Chakraborty A, Maiti T (2017) Pricing and return product collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with dual-channel in both forward and reverse logistics. J Manuf Syst 42:104–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Govindan K, Soleimani H, Kannan D (2015) Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: a comprehensive review to explore the future. Eur J Oper Res 240(3):603–626MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guide V, Harrison T, Van Wassenhove L (2003) The challenge of closed-loop supply chains. Interfaces 33(6):3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guide JrV, Van Wassenhove L (2009) The evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Oper Res 57(1):10–18CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hammond D, Beullens P (2007) Closed-loop supply chain network equilibrium under legislation. Eur J Oper Res 183(2):895–908CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heydari J, Govindan K, Jafari A (2017) Reverse and closed loop supply chain coordination by considering government role. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 52:379–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hong I, Yeh J (2012) Modeling closed-loop supply chains in the electronics industry: a retailer collection application. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics & Transportation Review 48(4):817–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Korchi A, Millet D (2014) Conditions of emergence of OEM’s reverse supply chains. J Remanuf 4(1):3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Krikke H, Bloemhof-Ruwaard J, Van Wassenhove L (2001) Design of closed loop supply chains: A production and return network for refrigerators. Int J Prod Res 41:3689–3719CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu L, Wang Z, Xu L, Hong X, Govindan K (2017) Collection effort and reverse channel choices in a closed-loop supply chain. J Clean Prod 144:492–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McGuire T, Staelin R (2008) An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Mark Sci 27(1):115–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Savaskan R, Van Wassenhove L (2006) Reverse channel design: the case of competing retailers. Manag Sci 52(1):1–14CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Savaskan R, Bhattacharya S, Van Wassenhove L (2004) Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Manag Sci 50(2):239–252CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Taleizadeh AA, Sane-Zerang E, Choi TM (2016) The effect of marketing effort on dual-channel closed-loop supply chain systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SystemsGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Taleizadeh AA, Moshtagh MS, Moon I (2018) Pricing, product quality, and collection optimization in a decentralized closed-loop supply chain with different channel structures: Game theoretical approach. Journal of Cleaner ProductionGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vorasayan J, Ryan S (2006) Optimal price and quantity of refurbished products. Prod Oper Manag 15(3):369–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wei J, Zhao J (2011) Pricing decisions with retail competition in a fuzzy closed-loop supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications 38(9):11,209–11,216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhao J (2015) Pricing and remanufacturing decisions in two competing supply chains. Int J Prod Res 53(1):258–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zheng B, Yang C, Yang J, Zhang M (2017) Dual-channel closed loop supply chains: forward channel competition, power structures and coordination [J]. International Journal of Production Research 55(12):3510–3527CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementTongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations