Protein & Cell

, Volume 8, Issue 11, pp 823–833 | Cite as

Recapitulating cortical development with organoid culture in vitro and modeling abnormal spindle-like (ASPM related primary) microcephaly disease

  • Rui Li
  • Le Sun
  • Ai Fang
  • Peng Li
  • Qian WuEmail author
  • Xiaoqun WangEmail author
Open Access
Research Article


The development of a cerebral organoid culture in vitro offers an opportunity to generate human brain-like organs to investigate mechanisms of human disease that are specific to the neurogenesis of radial glial (RG) and outer radial glial (oRG) cells in the ventricular zone (VZ) and subventricular zone (SVZ) of the developing neocortex. Modeling neuronal progenitors and the organization that produces mature subcortical neuron subtypes during early stages of development is essential for studying human brain developmental diseases. Several previous efforts have shown to grow neural organoid in culture dishes successfully, however we demonstrate a new paradigm that recapitulates neocortical development process with VZ, OSVZ formation and the lamination organization of cortical layer structure. In addition, using patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) with dysfunction of the Aspm gene from a primary microcephaly patient, we demonstrate neurogenesis defects result in defective neuronal activity in patient organoids, suggesting a new strategy to study human developmental diseases in central nerve system.


neocortical development cerebral organoid microcephaly ASPM 


The most highly evolved structure in the human brain is the neocortex, which is responsible for the higher cognitive functions unique to humans (Rakic, 2009; Borrell and Reillo, 2012). The dramatic human neocortical expansion and gyri formation underline the precise orchestration of neurogenesis and neuronal migration in the embryonic stage, especially during the peak of neurogenesis, which occurs during the second trimester of gestation in humans (Kriegstein et al., 2006; Lui et al., 2011; de Graaf-Peters and Hadders-Algra, 2006). Radial glial (RG) cells constitute a major population of neural progenitor cells and are referred to vRG cells (ventricular radial glial cells); these cells occupy the proliferative ventricular zone (VZ) (Noctor et al., 2002; Hartfuss et al., 2001; Anthony et al., 2004). vRG cells display interkinetic nuclear migration (INM) behavior, proliferate extensively at the luminal surface of the VZ and predominantly undergo asymmetric division to self-renew while simultaneously giving rise either directly to neurons or to an IPC that subsequently divides symmetrically to produce neurons (Kriegstein et al., 2006; Noctor et al., 2001; Fishell and Kriegstein, 2003; Huttner and Kosodo, 2005). A new population of neural stem/progenitor cells has recently been reported to occupy the greatly expanded subventricular zone (SVZ), which is composed of intermediate progenitor cells (IPCs) and outer radial glial (oRG) cells and can be divided into the inner (ISVZ) and outer SVZ (OSVZ) by the inner fiber layer (IFL) in primates (Dehay and Kennedy, 2007; Hansen et al., 2010; LaMonica et al., 2012; Garcia-Moreno et al., 2012). Unlike vRG cells, oRG cells show distinctive mitotic somal translocation (MST) behavior, giving rise to IPCs in humans (Hansen et al., 2010; LaMonica et al., 2012; Ostrem et al., 2014; Taverna and Huttner, 2010; Gertz et al., 2014) instead of neurons, as in mice (Wang et al., 2011), and serve as transit amplifying machinery for proliferative pool expansion (Lui et al., 2011; Fietz and Huttner, 2011; Pontious et al., 2008). An enlarged OSVZ, accompanied by an increase in both oRG cells and IPCs, may account for neuronal amplification and the tangential dispersion of neurons that contributes to cortical expansion and gyrification (Borrell and Reillo, 2012; LaMonica et al., 2012; Reillo et al., 2011; Nonaka-Kinoshita et al., 2013).

Extensive studies have demonstrated that the neocortex is a six-layered laminated structure generated by a specific pattern of neuronal production and migration. Newborn neurons migrate successively following the guidance of radial glial fibers over the existing early-born neurons during cortical development and occupy superficial layers in the cortical plate (CP), creating cortical layers (CL). Cortical lamination provides the basic framework for neocortical function (Gao et al., 2013; Douglas and Martin, 2004). Recent achievements suggest that the developing human neocortex differs significantly from the rodent model; however, due to limitations on the experimental manipulation of human tissues and on the monitoring of long-term development in patients, much of the recent progress in understanding cortical development has come from rodent studies (Wang et al., 2011; Caviness and Rakic, 1978; D’Arcangelo, 2006). Therefore, new research strategies need to be established to study human cortical development.

Several previous efforts to grow neural tissues in culture dishes, such as an optic cup (Eiraku et al., 2011), a pituitary gland (Suga et al., 2011), cortex-like cell layers (Nasu et al., 2012; Kadoshima et al., 2013; Eiraku et al., 2008), some brain-region-specific organoids (Qian et al., 2016; Pasca et al., 2015), entire brain-like organoids (Lancaster et al., 2013; Camp et al., 2015), and even organoids with surface folding (Li et al., 2017) have been reported. Also, organoids have been proven to be a remarkable model to study diseases, such as ZIKA virus (Qian et al., 2016; Cugola et al., 2016; Garcez et al., 2016; Nowakowski et al., 2016; Tang et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2016) and neural system disease (Lancaster et al., 2013; Bershteyn and, 2017). Therefore, organoid culture system is suitable for modeling neurodevelopmental diseases and related cognition defects.

To address this issue, we have developed a new three-dimensional culture system for a cortex-like tissue derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) in vitro. Here, we show that these cultured organoids recapitulate the lamination organization of the layered neocortex generated from vRG, oRG, and IP cells and eventually mimic the cortical development in vivo. Finally, in an investigation of the ASPM-dependent pathogenesis of microcephaly, we report that the cortical organoids generated from primary microcephaly patient-derived iPSCs were unable to form normal cortical lamination resulting in defective neuronal activity.


Self-organized organoids mimics early cerebral development

To develop a paradigm generating functional cerebral organoids, we used free floating embryonic bodies (EBs). Approximately 3 × 106 dissociated hiPSCs or hESCs were plated onto a low cell-adhesion plate and uniformly sized tight embryonic body-like aggregates formed within the first 7 days (Fig. 1A). On day 7, the aggregates were transferred to petri dishes for neural induction culture. The resulting 3D aggregates were then re-plated onto petri dishes for neural differentiation on day 50. The optimized culture conditions allowed these cell aggregates to continue to differentiate and mature beyond 120 days (Fig. 1A). To understand whether neurogenesis in organoids follows in-vivo development pattern, we dissected organoids at early stage. On day 36, the hiPSC-derived organoid grew fast and formed a ventricle-like cavity surrounded by neural progenitors (Fig. 1B). Around the ventricle, a thick layer of Sox2-positive progenitor cells and some expanded Tuj1-positive new-born neurons were observed in organoids, indicating neural progenitors and new-born neurons generated in these organoids (Fig. 1B). Also, the proliferative marker Ki67 and phospho-histone H3 (pH3), a marker for the G2-M phase, were detected in progenitor cells close to the ventricle. Around 77.21% cells were Ki67 staining positive in ventricular area, suggesting that early development of cortical development primarily focuses on cell proliferation (Fig. 1C). To further characterize the dorsal telencephalic progenitor cells, we stained ZO-1, Pax6, and Sox2 (Fig. 1D). The progenitors in the inner area exhibited ring structures of tight junction reviewed by ZO-1 (Fig. 1D), resembling a lateral ventricle with characteristic apical localization of the ventricular radial glia (vRG) (Gotz and Huttner 2005; Pilz et al., 2013).
Figure 1

The procedure for in vitro generation of a human cortex-like organoid. (A) Schematic diagram of the culture system for cortex-like organ formation in vitro. Representative bright field (BF) images of each stage. (B) Immunostaining results for the progenitor marker (Sox2, green) and new-born neuron marker (Tuj1, red) organoids on day 36. (C) Immunostaining for proliferating cells: Ki67 (green), pH3 (red, mitotic marker). The percentage of Ki67+ and pH3+ cells was shown on the right. (D) Immunostaining image for cortical NE-like structure after 36 days of neural induction. Sox2 (green), Pax6 (red), ZO-1 (magenta), and DAPI (grey). (E) Staining for Tbr2 (blue) and Sox2 (red) revealing OSVZ localization of basal progenitors. (F) Quantification of Sox2+ or Tbr2+ percentages within all progenitors in the VZ, ISVZ and OSVZ, respectively. All data are presented as means ± s.e.m. Scale bars: 200 μm in (A), 50 μm in (B–E)

To examine RG identity during the early development of these cerebral-like 3D tissues, we performed staining for phospho-vimentin (P-vim) and Sox2 on day 36 (Fig. S1A). We observed vRG for Sox2+ cells along the apical side with apical anchor and extended basal cellular processes toward the outer surface of these tissues in cerebral organoids. Since vRG cells typically divided on the lumen surface, we observed a series of mitotic cells at different dividing stages in organoids, such as prophase, metaphase, anaphase and telophase (Fig. S1A), resembling innate vRGs features in early human neocortical development. In primates, the population of oRGs is significantly larger than in rodents, and these oRGs play critical roles in neocortical neurogenesis. Sox2+/P-vim+ cells above VZ region exhibited long basal processes (Fig. S1A), suggesting that oRGs also exist in organoids. In consistent with previous proliferating marker staining results, we observed 19.55% and 6.39% mitotic vRGs and oRGs in VZ/SVZ area respectively (Fig. S1A).

In mammals, vRG cells initially divide symmetrically to enlarge the progenitor pool and then divide asymmetrically to maintain one daughter cell as vRG and the other as a progenitor cell, such as an oRG cell, an IP cell, or a newborn neuron (Hansen et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2011); hence the cell division behavior is a determinant for neural progenitor pool and cortical neurogenesis. To confirm division behavior of vRGs in cerebral-like tissue, we assessed the angle between cleavage plane and ventricle surface (Fig. S1B). In our hiPSC culture, proliferating apical progenitors preferentially divided from a “vertical” cleavage plane (60–90°, 57.0%; Fig. S1C) on day 36, indicating that vRGs primarily undergo symmetrically division to enrich vRG pool and also contribute to progenitor or neuron production at early culture time, which is similar to early cortical development. Additionally, we use time lapse to observe the activity of these vRG cells, and found typically interkinetic nucleus movement (INM) like vRG in vivo (Fig. S1D and Movie S1). These results indicate vRGs in organoids mimicked cellular activity in vivo.

To determine whether features of human brain development with oRG and IP cell existence were recapitulated in cerebral organoids, we analyzed the organoids on day 65 (Fig. 1E). The distribution of Sox2+ progenitors were examined and we observed a population concentrated close to the apical surface (VZ) that was thought to be vRG cells, as well as another population displaced from the apical surface (OSVZ), that was consistent with oRG identity in organoids (Fig. 1E and 1F). In addition, IP cells identified by Tbr2 staining primarily localized outside of but close to the VZ on day 65 (Fig. 1E and 1F). The presence and distribution of RGs and IP cells demonstrated that this new 3D culture system could mimic early development of brain with all types of known neural progenitors in dish.

Spatial neuron lamination of organoids

To assess neuron production abilities, neural progenitor cells were analyzed in the organoids on day 65 (Fig. 2A). The abundance and distribution of Sox2+ vRGs and oRGs, as well as Tbr2+ IPCs, were remarkably similar to human neocortex cytoarchitecture at GW16 (Fig. S2A), suggesting that this method could reproduce the fine structure of cerebral cortex, such as OSVZ (Fig. 2A).
Figure 2

Cortical spatial lamination in 3D organoid culture. (A) Cryosections of organoids were immunostained for progenitor markers on day 65. (B–E) Immunostaining results of progenitor and pyramidal markers in organoids on day 65 (B–D) and day 90 (E). Scale bars: 50 μm in (A–E)

The mammalian cortical plate consists of six distinct layers. To determine whether organoids could recapitulate the cortical spatial lamination, we stained for cortical layer markers on day 65. In hiPSC-derived neocortex-like tissues, Tbr2 positive subventricular zone (SVZ) was adjacent to the ventricular zone (VZ), which indicated by Sox2+ region, this result was consist with structures in vivo (Figs. 2A and S2A). Also, cortical plate (CP) indicated by Satb2+ neuron located outside of Pax6+ and Tbr2+ regions (Fig. 2B and 2C). Furthermore, we observed Reelin+ neurons along the basal surface (Fig. 2D), suggesting the presence of Cajal-Retzius like cells, which regulates the generation of cortical plate laminar architecture. Finally, in organoid of day 90, we could observe that later-born Satb2+ neurons localized more superficially to the early-born Ctip2+ neurons (Fig. 2E). This lamination was similar to human developing neocortex (Fig. S2B). Thus, this distribution pattern of dorsal cortical subtype-specific neurons resembles in vivo regional sub-specification, indicating these organoids derived from our culture system could efficiently model neocortex organization in vivo.

Electrophysiological properties of neurons in organoids

With the well-developed lamination in cultured hiPSC-derived organoids, we next investigated the functional characteristics of the neurons using electrophysiology. To examine whether the cells had functional membrane properties, we performed patch-clamp recordings on the outer most layer in cultured organoids (Fig. 3A). In voltage-clamp mode, fast-inactivating inward currents with increasing amplitudes were observed on days 51, 62, and 121 (Fig. 3B). In current-clamp mode, depolarizing the membrane could evoke more action potentials from the cells on day 121 than on day 51 (Fig. 3C). On day 121, the action potential exhibited higher amplitude, lower threshold, and faster kinetic of repolarization than its counterpart on day 51 (Fig. 3C). Spontaneous action potentials could be observed in the cells on day 121 (Fig. 3D). Furthermore, we obtained spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (sEPSCs) from organoids on day 121 (Fig. 3E). These data indicated that the neurons of the organoids underwent a process of maturation; also, chemical excitatory synapses were able to form among cells in the organoids due to the existence of mature like pyramidal neurons at late development stage.
Figure 3

Physiological properties of cells in organoids at different stages. (A) An example of cells in organoids recorded under DGC (top) and fluorescence (bottom). (B) Representative traces of membrane currents (black) evoked by depolarizing pulses of −10 mV or −20 mV. The Na+ currents were blocked by 1 μmol/L tetrodotoxin (TTX, red) and recovered (blue) after rinsing. (C) Representative traces of membrane potentials in response to a 500-ms current injection from a 51- (top) or 121-day-old (bottom) organoid. (D) Spontaneous action potentials were recorded from a 121-day-old organoid. (E) Spontaneous EPSCs in mature organoids. The average frequency and amplitude are shown on the right. n = 7 cells. All data are presented as means ± s.e.m. Scale bar: 20 μm in (A)

Organoids recapitulate microcephaly with Aspm mutation

Human autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH) is a heterogeneous disorder with mutations in twelve genetic loci (MCPH112) (Faheem et al., 2015; Woods et al., 2005). Mutations in the Aspm gene (abnormal spindle-like microcephaly-associated) at the MCPH5 locus are expected to be the most common cause of human primary microcephaly. The severely reduced brain size observed in patients with Aspm mutations has been proven to have difficulty in recapitulating in animal models (Pulvers et al., 2010). To determine whether neocortex-like organization by in-vitro 3D culture could be used to mimic neurodevelopmental disorders, iPSCs were generated from reprogrammed skin fibroblasts of a patient with severe microcephaly by retroviral delivery of four well-described reprogramming factors: Oct4, Sox2, c-Myc, and Klf4 (Okita et al., 2007; Takahashi and Yamanaka, 2006). We generated many independent clones and characterized three of these in terms of morphology and pluripotency. All three hiPSC-ASPM cell clones, including hiPSC-ASPM-1, hiPSC-ASPM-2 and hiPSC-ASPM-3, presented normal human karyotypes (Fig. S3A). By sequencing the exons of the three hiPSC-ASPM cell clones, we identified a heterozygous mutation at 9,910 C→T ln exon 25 that introduced a premature stop codon and a homozygous mutation at 7,684 A→G in exon 18 that produced a S2562G missense mutation, which is consistent with previously reported Aspm mutations in primary microcephaly patients (Bond et al., 2003) (Fig. S3B). All three hiPSC-ASPM cell lines exhibited similar expression levels of the Aspm gene, which was down-regulated compared to the hiPSC-control cell clone (Fig. S3C). In addition, we found some pluripotent stem cell marker genes were slightly down regulated in hiPSC-ASPM cell clones (Fig. S3D) and iPSC grew normally (Fig. S3E), suggesting that Aspm mutations may not directly change the differentiation potentials in iPSCs. Under our 3D culture system, we observed that all hiPSC-ASPM cell lines displayed smaller embryonic bodies compared to the control (Figs. 4A, 4B, and S4A). 3D aggregates from hiPSC-ASPM cell lines were smaller, less condensed and less neocortex-like morphology than hiPSC-control (Figs. 4A and S4A). On day 36, the hiPSC-control derived neural progenitors reproducibly formed larger and more continuous polarized neuroepithelial structures with a ventricle-like cavity inside, but hiPSC-ASPM cell lines develop aggregates only occasionally as small rosette-like neuroepithelial regions without the structural cell alignments as in the control culture (Fig. 4C). Moreover, the ASPM mutant 3D aggregates exhibited very few cells positive for Pax6, Sox2 and ZO-1 (Figs. 4C and S4B) and displayed fewer Ki67+ and pH3+ cells (Figs. 4C, 4D, S5A, and S5B). Moreover, the distribution of these cells was discrete and disorganized in all hiPSC-ASPM organoids compared to the control (Figs. 4C and S4B). These overall smaller neural tissues were suggestive of the reduced brain size observed in patients (Bond et al., 2002).
Figure 4

Human ASPM mutant organoids show disrupted cerebral development. (A) Representative BF images of control and ASPM-2 organoids at different stages. (B) The diameter of organoids generated from each hiPSC lines. (C) Immunostaining of NE markers in control and ASPM-2 organoids. (D) The percentage of Ki67+ and pH3+ cells in VZ of the developing organoids. n = 3, 3 slices for control and ASPM-2 group. (E) Immunostaining for progenitor markers of control and ASPM-2 organoids on day 65. (F) Immunostaining of telencephalic, neuronal and progenitor marker of control and ASPM-2 organoids on day 65. (G–I) Immunostaining results for progenitor and pyramidal markers of control and ASPM-2 organoids on day 65. All data are presented as means ± s.e.m. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. Scale bar: 200 μm in (A), 50 μm in (C, E–I)

To test the proliferation defect, we independently performed RNAi knockdown of Aspm by electroporating GFP expressing shRNA in organoids. The endogenous Aspm RNAi efficiency was first verified by RT-qPCR (Fig. S5C). Knockdown of Aspm in hiPSC-control organoids led to a decrease of Ki67+ and pH3+ cells close to ventricle (Fig. S5D–F), consistent with the defective phenotype observed in ASPM patient organoids. These findings support the conclusion that ASPM mutant could induce deficiency in proliferation of progenitors. These patient-derived cerebral organoids provided a unique opportunity to examine the hypoplasia observed in microcephaly.

Since organoids generated from hiPSC-ASPM-2 exhibited the more condensed cell mass and intact morphology than organoids derived from hiPSC-ASPM-1 or hiPSC-ASPM-3 (Figs. 4A and S4A), and all of organoids showed similar developing phenotypes, we utilized hiPSC-ASPM-2 as a representative for more detailed studies. Consistent with observations at early culture time, organized lumen structures were hardly maintained in mutants on day 65 (Fig. 4E). We could observe dividing Sox2+/P-vim+ vRG cells along the apical side in hiPSC-control tissues but not hiPSC-ASPM organoids (Fig. 4E). The amount of vRG and oRG cells in hiPSC-ASPM organoids was significantly reduced compared to control (Fig. 4E). On day 65, Tbr2+ IPCs primarily localized outside of but close to the VZ, showing a pattern similar to that of the human developing cortex (Fig. 1E). Unsurprisingly, Tbr2+ cells were discrete and disorganized in mutant organoids (Fig. 4E). In summary, the loss of lumen structure and neural progenitor cells in hiPSC-ASPM organoids might mimic the pathogenesis of primary microcephaly in human fetal brain development. Although hiPSC-ASPM organoids developed towards telencephalon revealed by FoxG1 staining, the elaborative lamination was not observed in Aspm mutant 3D aggregations, suggesting that the culture system was able to model cortical development diseases.

Calcium imaging data of control and mutant organoids

In hiPSC-ASPM aggregates, although abnormal lamination of neurons was not observed, many Satb2+ or Ctip2+ neurons were scattered throughout the cell masses (Figs. 4H, 4I, and S4C); therefore, we asked whether these neurons share the same properties as neurons in hiPSC-control organoids. Previous electrophysiological analyses suggested that the neurons began to mature after day 62 (Fig. 3B); hence, we examined calcium activity in organoids on day 85. TTX-sensitive calcium events could be detected in control and mutant organoids (Fig. 5A and 5B), suggesting the presence of active neurons in both hiPSC-control and hiPSC-ASPM-2 aggregates. However, the proportion of cells with calcium activity was reduced in mutants compared to control on day 85 (Fig. 5C), indicating that there were fewer mature neurons in hiPSC-ASPM-2 aggregates than in controls, which may induced by defects in proliferation of progenitors (Figs. 4C, 4D, S5A, and S5B) but not by neuron apoptosis (Fig. S5G and S5H). We analyzed the neurons with active calcium signals and observed that the spontaneous calcium transient frequencies were similar to those of controls (Fig. 5D), but the active cells were not synchronized as well as controls (Fig. 5E), suggesting the neural circuit in hiPSC-ASPM-2 organoids may be dysfunctional. These results indicate that although a less organized structure and fewer mature neurons were observed in hiPSC-ASPM culture, these neurons were able to be activated; however, these neurons were less synchronized and neuronal circuit was not as mature as control group.
Figure 5

Calcium imaging results of control and mutant organoids. (A) Representative images of synchronized calcium activity of cells in control and ASPM-2 organoids. (B) Representative traces before and after TTX-treated in control and mutant organoids. (C) Percentage of active cells in control and ASPM-2 organoids, n = 8, 9 trials for control and ASPM-2 groups. (D) Average spontaneous calcium transients of single cells in control and ASPM-2 organoids, n = 78, 47 cells for control and ASPM-2 groups. (E) Averaged ratio of synchronized cells in control and ASPM-2 organoids, n = 5, 5 trials for control and ASPM-2 groups. All data are presented as means ± s.e.m. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. Scale bar: 50 μm in (A)


In this report, we have established an approach to generate cerebral organoids from hESCs or hiPSCs following dissociation, self-aggregation, and differentiation with minimal extrinsic signals added to the culture system (Fig. 1A). This three-dimensional culture method recapitulates in vivo cortical development with formation of a well-polarized ventricle neuroepithelial structure; vRG, oRG and IP cells; and production of mature neurons within layers (Figs. 13).

Cerebral organoid culture has been developed and applied widely in cortical developmental diseases. Primary microcephaly with CDK5RAP2 mutation and Zika virus infection were studied by cerebral organoid culture suggests that 3D culture could recapitulate real in vivo organ development to some extent (Lancaster et al., 2013; Tang et al., 2016). Since this system displays fundamental characteristics of human telencephalon cortical development, it is a promising approach to study the pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental disorders. Here, we have modeled microcephaly by generating organoids from the iPSCs of ASPM-mutation patients. Mutations in the Aspm gene at the MCPH5 locus are the most common cause of human primary microcephaly leading to a reduction of cerebral cortex size, congenital failure and mental retardation (Bond et al., 2002, 2003). We have observed defects of early development in aggregates from hiPSC-ASPM cells characterized by a less organized neuroepithelium and fewer vRG, oRG, and defective layer lamination (Figs. 4 and S4). Studies in Drosophila suggest that ASPM may interact with myosin II in regulating spindle orientation and interkinetic nuclear migration (INM) in neural progenitor cells (Rujano et al., 2013), suggesting that vRG cells with Aspm mutation possibly experienced defective INM, resulting in reduction of oRG cells in the late developmental stages in our culture system (Fig. 4E). This observation could explain why no sufficient ASPM-deletion mouse models that recapitulate microcephaly phenotypes have been developed. Because oRG cells are considered to play a major role in cortical expansion in primates; however, this cell type is limited in rodents (Wang et al., 2011). Cerebral cortical development is an elaborative temporal-spatial progress. Using calcium imaging, we found that fewer neurons had matured and less synchronized neuronal activities had been detected at the late stage of development in the Aspm mutants (Fig. 5), which could be the reason that ASPM-related microcephaly patients present congenital failure and mental retardation (Bond et al., 2002, 2003; Shen et al., 2005).

The availability of our novel culture system offers a resource for pathological studies of neurodevelopmental diseases, furthermore, this hESC/hiPSC-derived organoid culture may also be used for various future biomedical applications, including cell therapies, drug discovery and toxicology studies.

Materials and Methods

Human induced pluripotent stem cell culture

Cell maintenance and 3D culture procedure are described in SI Materials and Methods.

Karyotyping and RT-PCR

Karyotypes were determined with standard G-banding chromosome analysis in the Oakland Children Hospital. RT-PCR procedure and primer sequences are in SI Materials and Methods.


Cell aggregates were fixed in cold 4% PFA for 30 min at 4°C followed by incubated in 15% (w/v) sucrose solution overnight at 4°C and then embedded in O.C.T. compound, frozen at −20°C and cryosectioned at 10 μm. Immunostaining and antibody information is available in SI Materials and Methods.

Flow cytometry

Cell aggregates were fixed in cold 70% alcohol for 30 min at 4°C overnight followed by two washes with PBS. Aggregates were incubated in PBS including Propidium Iodide (PI, 50 μg/mL) and RNase A (50 μg/mL) for 30 min at 4°C. Signals were detected with a FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). ModFit was used to analysis cell cycle.

Electrophysiology and calcium imaging

Detail materials and methods are available in SI Materials and Methods.

Statistical analysis

All data are presented as mean values and standard error of mean (s.e.m.), and two-tailed Student’s t-tests were used to determine statistical significance. Cell numbers were counted with Imaris (Bitplane) software and ImageJ. Detail quantification methods are available in SI Materials and Methods.



We thank A. Alvarez-Buylla, A.R. Kriegstein, R.Blelloch, and S. Wang for comments on the manuscript. We also thank C. Nicolas (Kriegstein lab) and K. Tomoda (Yamanaka lab) for suggestions and members of the Wang laboratory for discussion. This work was supported by National Basic Research Program of China (Nos. 2014CB964600, 2015CB964800 and 2017YFA0102601), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA01020309), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 31371100, 91332105 to X.W., 31400937, 31676072 to Q. W., 31400939 to L.S. and 31600840 to R.L.


CL, cortical layers; CP, cortical plate; EBs, embryonic bodies; INM, interkinetic nuclear migration; iPSCs, induced pluripotent stem cells; MST, mitotic somal translocation; oRG, outer radial glial; RG, radial glial; SVZ, subventricular zone; VZ, ventricular zone

Compliance with ethics guidelines

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science, committee on biosafety and ethics) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. Rui Li, Le Sun, Ai Fang, Peng Li, Qian Wu, and Xiaoqun Wang declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author contribution

Q.W. and X.W. conceptualized and designed the experiments. R.L., Q.W., L.S., A. F. and P. L. performed all the experiments, analyzed and interpreted the data. Q.W., R.L., L.S. and X.W. wrote the manuscript, which all authors edited and approved.

Supplementary material

13238_2017_479_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (17.8 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 18249 kb)


  1. Anthony TE, Klein C, Fishell G, Heintz N (2004) Radial glia serve as neuronal progenitors in all regions of the central nervous system. Neuron 41(6):881–890CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bershteyn M et al (2017) Human iPSC-derived cerebral organoids model cellular features of lissencephaly and reveal prolonged mitosis of outer radial glia. Cell Stem Cell 20(4):435–449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond J et al (2002) ASPM is a major determinant of cerebral cortical size. Nat Genet 32(2):316–320CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond J et al (2003) Protein-truncating mutations in ASPM cause variable reduction in brain size. Am J Hum Genet 73(5):1170–1177CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Borrell V, Reillo I (2012) Emerging roles of neural stem cells in cerebral cortex development and evolution. Dev Neurobiol 72(7):955–971CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Camp JG et al (2015) Human cerebral organoids recapitulate gene expression programs of fetal neocortex development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(51):15672–15677PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Caviness VS Jr, Rakic P (1978) Mechanisms of cortical development: a view from mutations in mice. Annu Rev Neurosci 1:297–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cugola FR et al (2016) The Brazilian Zika virus strain causes birth defects in experimental models. Nature 534(7606):267–271PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Arcangelo G (2006) Reelin mouse mutants as models of cortical development disorders. Epilepsy Behav 8(1):81–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. de Graaf-Peters VB, Hadders-Algra M (2006) Ontogeny of the human central nervous system: what is happening when? Early Hum Dev 82(4):257–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dehay C, Kennedy H (2007) Cell-cycle control and cortical development. Nat Rev Neurosci 8(6):438–450CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Douglas RJ, Martin KA (2004) Neuronal circuits of the neocortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:419–451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Eiraku M et al (2008) Self-organized formation of polarized cortical tissues from ESCs and its active manipulation by extrinsic signals. Cell Stem Cell 3(5):519–532CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Eiraku M et al (2011) Self-organizing optic-cup morphogenesis in three-dimensional culture. Nature 472(7341):51–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Faheem M et al (2015) Molecular genetics of human primary microcephaly: an overview. BMC Med Genom 8(Suppl 1):S4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fietz SA, Huttner WB (2011) Cortical progenitor expansion, self-renewal and neurogenesis-a polarized perspective. Curr Opin Neurobiol 21(1):23–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fishell G, Kriegstein AR (2003) Neurons from radial glia: the consequences of asymmetric inheritance. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13(1):34–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gao P, Sultan KT, Zhang XJ, Shi SH (2013) Lineage-dependent circuit assembly in the neocortex. Development 140(13):2645–2655CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Garcez PP et al (2016) Zika virus impairs growth in human neurospheres and brain organoids. Science 352(6287):816–818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Garcia-Moreno F, Vasistha NA, Trevia N, Bourne JA, Molnar Z (2012) Compartmentalization of cerebral cortical germinal zones in a lissencephalic primate and gyrencephalic rodent. Cereb Cortex 22(2):482–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gertz CC, Lui JH, LaMonica BE, Wang X, Kriegstein AR (2014) Diverse behaviors of outer radial glia in developing ferret and human cortex. J Neurosci 34(7):2559–2570CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Gotz M, Huttner WB (2005) The cell biology of neurogenesis. Nat Rev 6(10):777–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hansen DV, Lui JH, Parker PR, Kriegstein AR (2010) Neurogenic radial glia in the outer subventricular zone of human neocortex. Nature 464(7288):554–561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hartfuss E, Galli R, Heins N, Gotz M (2001) Characterization of CNS precursor subtypes and radial glia. Dev Biol 229(1):15–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Huttner WB, Kosodo Y (2005) Symmetric versus asymmetric cell division during neurogenesis in the developing vertebrate central nervous system. Curr Opin Cell Biol 17(6):648–657CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kadoshima T et al (2013) Self-organization of axial polarity, inside-out layer pattern, and species-specific progenitor dynamics in human ES cell-derived neocortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(50):20284–20289CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Kriegstein A, Noctor S, Martinez-Cerdeno V (2006) Patterns of neural stem and progenitor cell division may underlie evolutionary cortical expansion. Nat Rev Neurosci 7(11):883–890CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. LaMonica BE, Lui JH, Wang X, Kriegstein AR (2012) OSVZ progenitors in the human cortex: an updated perspective on neurodevelopmental disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol 22(5):747–753CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Lancaster MA et al (2013) Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature 501(7467):373–379CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Li Y et al (2017) Induction of expansion and folding in human cerebral organoids. Cell stem cell 20(3):385–396CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lui JH, Hansen DV, Kriegstein AR (2011) Development and evolution of the human neocortex. Cell 146(1):18–36CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Nasu M et al (2012) Robust formation and maintenance of continuous stratified cortical neuroepithelium by laminin-containing matrix in mouse ES cell culture. PloS ONE 7(12):e53024CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Noctor SC, Flint AC, Weissman TA, Dammerman RS, Kriegstein AR (2001) Neurons derived from radial glial cells establish radial units in neocortex. Nature 409(6821):714–720CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Noctor SC et al (2002) Dividing precursor cells of the embryonic cortical ventricular zone have morphological and molecular characteristics of radial glia. J Neurosci 22(8):3161–3173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Nonaka-Kinoshita M et al (2013) Regulation of cerebral cortex size and folding by expansion of basal progenitors. EMBO J 32(13):1817–1828CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Nowakowski TJ et al (2016) Expression analysis highlights AXL as a candidate Zika virus entry receptor in neural stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 18(5):591–596CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Okita K, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S (2007) Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 448(7151):313–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ostrem BE, Lui JH, Gertz CC, Kriegstein AR (2014) Control of outer radial glial stem cell mitosis in the human brain. Cell Rep 8(3):656–664CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Pasca AM et al (2015) Functional cortical neurons and astrocytes from human pluripotent stem cells in 3D culture. Nat Methods 12(7):671–678CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Pilz GA et al (2013) Amplification of progenitors in the mammalian telencephalon includes a new radial glial cell type. Nat Commun 4:2125CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Pontious A, Kowalczyk T, Englund C, Hevner RF (2008) Role of intermediate progenitor cells in cerebral cortex development. Dev Neurosci 30(1–3):24–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Pulvers JN et al (2010) Mutations in mouse Aspm (abnormal spindle-like microcephaly associated) cause not only microcephaly but also major defects in the germline. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(38):16595–16600CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Qian X et al (2016) Brain-region-specific organoids using mini-bioreactors for modeling ZIKV exposure. Cell 165(5):1238–1254CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Rakic P (2009) Evolution of the neocortex: a perspective from developmental biology. Nat Rev Neurosc 10(10):724–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reillo I, de Juan Romero C, Garcia-Cabezas MA, Borrell V (2011) A role for intermediate radial glia in the tangential expansion of the mammalian cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 21(7):1674–1694CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Rujano MA, Sanchez-Pulido L, Pennetier C, le Dez G, Basto R (2013) The microcephaly protein Asp regulates neuroepithelium morphogenesis by controlling the spatial distribution of myosin II. Nat Cell Biol 15(11):1294–1306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Shen J et al (2005) ASPM mutations identified in patients with primary microcephaly and seizures. J Med Genet 42(9):725–729CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Suga H et al (2011) Self-formation of functional adenohypophysis in three-dimensional culture. Nature 480(7375):57–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126(4):663–676CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Tang H et al (2016) Zika virus infects human cortical neural progenitors and attenuates their growth. Cell Stem Cell 18(5):587–590CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Taverna E, Huttner WB (2010) Neural progenitor nuclei in motion. Neuron 67(6):906–914CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang X, Tsai JW, LaMonica B, Kriegstein AR (2011) A new subtype of progenitor cell in the mouse embryonic neocortex. Nat Neurosci 14(5):555–561CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Woods CG, Bond J, Enard W (2005) Autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH): a review of clinical, molecular, and evolutionary findings. Am J Hum Genet 76(5):717–728CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Xu M et al (2016) Identification of small-molecule inhibitors of Zika virus infection and induced neural cell death via a drug repurposing screen. Nat Med 22(10):1101–1107CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology (Shanghai), Institute of BiophysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Beijing Institute for Brain DisordersBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations