Skip to main content
Log in

Chromosome diversity and karyotype asymmetry analysis in four cultivated triploid and three diploid wild genotypes of Musa from North-East India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Nucleus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ploidy and karyotype asymmetry of four cultivated Musa acuminata var. Luwaobi, var. Masung Tabi, var. Gopi and var. Poitrish Kola (2n = 3x = 33) and three wild seeded M. acuminata var. Ram Kola, Musa balbisiana var. Blung Thali and Musa laterita (2n = 2x = 22) were reported for the first time from North East India. The predominance of median constricted chromosomes was found as compared to sub-median constricted chromosome in all genotypes. The average chromosome length varied from 1.55 μm in var. Luwaobi to 1.92 μm in var. Ram Kola. Symmetric karyotype was recorded in the wild as compared to the cultivated Musa genotypes. Out of the twelve inter- and intra-chromosomal asymmetry indices studied, intra-chromosomal asymmetry index (A1) versus inter-chromosomal asymmetry index (A2), relative variation in the centromeric index (CVCI) versus relative variation in chromosome length (CVCL) and heterogeneity of chromosome length (AI) versus dispersion index were found most reliable to assess chromosome asymmetry. Most symmetric karyotype was found in var. Poitrish Kola of Tripura and most asymmetric karyotype was found in var. Luwaobi of Manipur among cultivated genotypes. Genotype var. Ram Kola showed more karyotype asymmetry among the wild Musa as compared to var. Blung Thali of Tripura and M. laterita of Sikkim. Phylogenetic tree obtained from chromosome characters revealed that var. Ram Kola has ancestral karyotype and was found to be distantly related from the others. Two wild seeded genotypes M. balbisiana var. Blung Thali and M. laterita were found to have close relationship with AB genome suggesting the phylogenetic ancestry with AA or AAA genotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Arano H. Cytological studies in subfamily Carduoideae (Compositae) of Japan. IX. The karyotype analysis and phylogenetic considerations on Pertya and Ainsliaea. Bot Mag. 1963;76:32–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Argent GCG. The wild bananas of Papua New Guinea. Notes R Bot Gard Edinb. 1976;35:77–114.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Assis FNM, Souza BCQ, Medeiros-Neto E, Pinheiro F, Silva AEB, Felix LP. Karyology of the genus Epidendrum (Orchidaceae: Laeliinae) with emphasis on subgenus Amphiglottium and chromosome number variability in Epidendrum secundum. Bot J Linn Soc. 2013;172:329–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Atom AD, Lalrinfela P, Thangjam R. Genome classification of banana genetic resources of Manipur using morphological characters. Sci Vis. 2015;15:189–95.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Azhar M, Heslop-Harrison JS. Genomes, diversity and resistance gene analogues in Musa species. Cytogen Genome Res. 2008;121:59–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bartoš J, Alkhimova O, Doleželová M, De Langhe E, Doležel J. Nuclear genome size and genomic distribution of ribosomal DNA in Musa and Ensete (Musaceae): taxonomic implications. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;109:50–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheesman EE. Classification of the bananas. The genus Ensete Horan and the genus Musa L. Kew Bull. 1947;2:97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Christelová P, De Langhe E, Hřibová E, Čížková J, Sardos J, Hušáková M, Van den Houwe I, Sutanto A, Kepler AK, Swennen R, Roux N, Doležel J. Molecular and cytological characterization of the global Musa germplasm collection provides insights into the treasure of banana diversity. Biodivers Conserv. 2017;26:801–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Čížková J, Hřibová E, Humplíková L, Christelová P, Suchánková P, Doležel J. Molecular analysis and genomic organization of major DNA satellites in Banana (Musa spp.). PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e54808.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. D’Hont A. Unraveling the genome structure of polyploids using FISH and GISH; examples of sugarcane and banana. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;109:27–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. D’Hont A, Paget-Goy A, Escoute J, Carreel F. The interspecific genome structure of cultivated banana, Musa spp. revealed by genomic DNA in situ hybridization. Theor Appl Genet. 2000;100:177–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Daniells JW, Jenny C, Karamura DA, Tomekpe K, Arnaud E, Sharrock S. Musalogue: a catalogue of Musa germplasm. Diversity in the genus Musa. INIBAP, Montpellier (FRA). 2001; 213.

  13. Das AB, Das P. Estimation of 4C DNA content and karyotype analysis in edible varieties of banana (Musa acuminata). Cytobios. 1994;78:213–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Das AB, Das P. Estimation of nuclear DNA content and karyotype analysis in nine cultivars of Musa acuminata. Cytobios. 1997;90:181–92.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Das AB, Mallick R. Varietal difference in 4C DNA content and chromosome characteristic of Coriandrum sativum L. Cytologia. 1989;54:609–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Das AB, Mallick R. Karyotype diversity and interspecific 4C DNA variation in Bupleurum. Biol Plant. 1993;35:355–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Das AB, Das A, Pradhan C, Naskar SK. Genotypic variations of ten Indian varietiess of Colocasia esculenta var antiquorom Schott. evident by chromosomal and RAPD markers. Caryologia. 2015;68:44–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Doležel J, Valárik M, Vrána J, Lysák MA, Hřibová E, Batroš J, Gasmanová N, Doleželova M, Šafář J, Šimková H. Molecular cytogenetics and cytometry of bananas (Musa Spp.). In: Jain SM, Swennen R, editors. Banana improvement: cellular, molecular biology, and induced mutations. Enfield: Science Publishers, Inc.; 2004. p. 229–44.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Garcia-Vallve S, Palau J, Romeu A. Horigental gene transfer in glycosyl hydrolases inferred from codon usage in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16:1125–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghosh S, Das A, Ghorai A, Jha TB. Comparative kayomorphology of edible Musa varietiess of West Bengal. Caryologia. 2013;66:243–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Greilhuber J, Speta F. C-banded karyotypes in the Scilla hohenackeri group, S. persica, and Puschkinia (Liliaceae). Plant Syst Evol. 1976;126:149–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guerra M. Reviewing chromosome nomenclature of Levan et al. Rev Bras Gen. 1986;4:741–3.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Häkkinen M. Reappraisal of sectional taxonomy in Musa (Musaceae). Taxon. 2013;62:809–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hřibová E, Čížková J, Christelová P, Taudien S, De Langhe E, Doležel J. The ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 sequence region in the Musaceae: structure, diversity and use in molecular phylogeny. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e17863.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Huziwara Y. Karyotype analysis in some genera of Compositae VIII. Further studies on the chromosomes of Aster. Am J Bot. 1962;49:116–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jeridi M, Bakry F, Escoute J, Fondi E, Carreel F, Ferchichi A, D’Hont A, Rodier-Goud M. Homoeologous chromosome pairing between the A and B genomes of Musa spp. revealed by genomic in situ hybridization. Ann Bot. 2011;108:975–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. La Siljak-Yakovlev S. dysploïdie et l’évolution du caryotype. Bocconea. 1996;5:211–20.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lalrinfela PC, Thangjam R. Genome characterization of banana genetic resources of Mizoram, India. Sci Vis. 2012;12:32–6.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lavania UC, Srivastava S. A simple parameter of dispersion index that serves as a adjunct to karyotype asymmetry. J Biosci. 1992;17:179–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Leitch IJ, Beaulieu JM, Cheung K, Hanson L, Lysak M, Fay MF. Punctuated genome size evolution in Liliaceae. J Evol Biol. 2007;20:2296–308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Levan A, Fredya K, Sandberg A. Nomenclatyure for centromeric position on chromosome. Heridity. 1964;52:201–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Levitsky GA. The karyotype in systematics. Bull Appl Bot Genet Plant Breed. 1931;27:220–40.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Li LF, Häkkinen M, Yuan YM, Hao G, Ge XJ. Molecular phylogeny and systematics of the banana family (Musaceae) inferred from multiple nuclear and chloroplast DNA fragments, with a special reference to the genus Musa. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010;57:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Li Y, Zhang Z, Wu W, Miao S, Chang J. Chromosome and karyotype analysis of Hibiscus mutabilis f. mutabilis. Front Life Sci. 2015;8:300–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Martin E, Yıldız HK, Kahraman A, Binzat OK, Eroğlu HE. Detailed chromosome measurements and karyotype asymmetry of some Vicia (Fabaceae) taxa from Turkey. Caryologia. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2018.1460058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Medeiros-Neto E, Nollet F, Moraes AP, Felix LP. Intrachromosomal karyotype asymmetry in Orchidaceae. Genet Mol Biol. 2017;40:610–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Paszko B. A critical review and a proposal of karotype asymmetry indices. Plant Syst Evol. 2006;258:39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Perrier X, Langhe ED, Donohue M, Lentfer C, Vrydaghs L, Bakry F, Carreel F, Hippolyte I, Horry J-P, Jenny C, Lebot V, Risterucci A-M, Tomekpe K, Doutrelepont H, Ball T, Manwaring J, Maret Pd, Denham T. Multidisciplinary perspectives on banana (Musa spp.) domestication. PNAS. 2011;108:11311–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Peruzzi L, Eroǧlu HE. Karyotype asymmetry: again, how to measure and what to measure? Comp Cytogenet. 2013;7:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Peruzzi L, Leitch IJ, Caparelli KF. Chromosome diversity and evolution in Liliaceae. Ann Bot (Lond). 2009;103:459–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Pierozzi NI. Karyotype and nor-banding of mitotic chromosomes of some Vitis L. species. Rev Bras Frutic. 2011; 33(special issue):564–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rai S, Das AB, Das P. Estimation of 4C DNA and karyotype analysis in ginger (Zingiber officinale Rscc)—I. Cytologia. 1997;62:133–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Risterucci AM, Hippolyte I, Perrier X, Xia L, Caig V, Evers M, Huttner E, Kilian A, Glaszmann JC. Development and assessment of diversity arrays technology for high-throughput DNA analyses in Musa. Theor Appl Genet. 2009;119:1093–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Romero-Zarco CR. A new method for estimating karyotype asymmetry. Taxon. 1986;35:526–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shi L, Li H, Gao R, et al. Chromosome number and karyotype analysis of Althaea rosea. Jiangsu Agric Sci. 2009;5:173–4.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Siljak-Yakovlev S, Peruzzi L. Cytogenetic characterization of endemics: past and future. Plant Biosyst. 2012;146:694–702.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Simmonds NW, Shepherd K. The taxonomy and origin of the cultivated banana. J Linn Soc Bot. 1955;55:302–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sokal PR, Rohlf FJ. Introduction to biostatistic. San Franscisco: Freeman; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Souza LGR, Crosa O, Guerra M. Karyological circumscription of Ipheion Rafinesque (Gilliesioideae, Alliaceae). Plant Syst Evol. 2010;287:119–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Stebbins GL. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. London: Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd.; 1971. p. 216.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Takahashi H. Karyotype variations of Tricyrtis hirta Hook. (Liliaceae). Acta Phytotax Geobot. 1991;42:113–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Uma S, Saravanaperumal SA, Saraswathi MS, Durai P, Sharma TVRS, Singh BD, Selvarajan R, Sathiamoorthy S. Studies on the origin and diversification of Indian wild banana (Musa balbisiana) using arbitrarily amplified DNA markers. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2005;80:575–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Uma S, Siva SA, Saraswathi MS, Manickavasagam M, Durai P, Selvarajan R, Sathiamoorthy S. Variation and intraspecific relationships in Indian wild Musa balbisiana (BB) population as evidenced by random amplified polymorphic DNA. Genet Res Crop Evol. 2006;53:349–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Watanabe K, Yahara T, Denda T, Kosegu K. Chromosomal evolution in the genus Brachyscome (Asteraceae, Astereae): statistical tests regarding correlation between changes in karyotype and habit using phylogenetic information. J Plant Res. 1999;112:145–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zuo L, Yuan Q. The difference between the heterogeneity of the centromeric index and intrachromosomal asymmetry. Plant Syst Evol. 2011;297:141–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Head of the Botany, Utkal University for providing administrative and microscopic facilities developed under DSR-III, University Grant Commission, and FIST programme, Govt. of India to carry out the research. Thanks to Prof. (Mrs.) K. Sarangthem, Department of Botany, Manipur University for her help during the collection of banana germplasms from Manipur. The financial support received from the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India [Project No DBT-NER/AGRI/33/2016 (Group-I, Application No. 02 & 90)] is duly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anath Bandhu Das.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Corresponding Editor: Anita Mukherjee.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOC 26 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dehery, S.K., Panda, E., Saha, P.R. et al. Chromosome diversity and karyotype asymmetry analysis in four cultivated triploid and three diploid wild genotypes of Musa from North-East India. Nucleus 64, 167–179 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13237-020-00334-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13237-020-00334-z

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Anath Bandhu Das