The Nucleus

, Volume 61, Issue 2, pp 83–93 | Cite as

In vitro propagation of Cajanus cajan × C. cajanifolius hybrid and its characterization using cyto-morphological and SSR markers

  • Syeelva Panda
  • Sujit Kumar Mishra
  • Aparupa Naik
  • Sanjat Kumar Sahu
  • Jogeswar PanigrahiEmail author
Original Article


Cajanus cajanifolius, the putative progenitor species of pigeonpea (C. cajan), has many agro-economic traits that deserve attention for introgression into pigeonpea cultivars. However, unidirectional compatibility creates barriers for interspecific hybridization and alien gene transfer between these two species. In the present study, very low percentage of pod setting and F1 seed germination were observed. Thus, attempts were made for the propagation of interspecific F1 hybrids in vitro, and an efficient in vitro propagation protocol has been optimized. Excised cotyledonary explants of F1 hybrids were cultured on both MS and Blaydes’ medium supplemented with NAA, BAP and GA3 at various combinations and concentrations. MS medium with BAP (25 μM) was most suitable for multiple shoot induction. MS medium was found to be superior for both multiple shoot and root induction from cotyledonary explants. Cyto-morphological and SSR marker based analysis confirmed the hybridity of the micro-propagated F1 plantlets. Meiocytes of the regenerated F1 hybrids experienced chromosome heteromorphism during diakinesis leading to laggard and bridge formation at anaphase-I. The present study evidenced the scope of interspecific hybridization between C. cajan and C. cajanifolius aiming at transmission of stress tolerant genes from C. cajanifolius to the cultivated gene pool of pigeonpea for broadening its genetic base.


Interspecific hybrid In vitro culture Meiosis SSR marker Hybridity 



The authors are grateful to the International Foundation for Science, Sweden for the financial assistance through the Young Scientist scheme (C-4584-1) to the author (JP), and to the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi for providing INSPIRE Fellowship (DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/2013/383) to the author (SKM).


  1. 1.
    Blaydes DF. Interaction of kinetin and various inhibitors in the growth of soybean callus. Physiol Plant. 1966;19:748–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bohra A, Dubey A, Saxena RK, Penmetsa RV, Poornima KN, Kumar N, et al. Analysis of BAC-end sequences (BESs) and development of BES-SSR markers for genetic mapping and hybrid purity assessment in pigeonpea (Cajanus spp.). BMC Plant Biol. 2011;11:56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dongre AB, Raut MP, Bhandarkar MR, Meshram KJ. Identification and genetic purity testing of cotton F1 hybrids using molecular markers. Indian J Biotechnol. 2011;10:301–6.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Geetha N, Venkatachalam P, Prakash V, Lakhmisita G. High frequency induction of multiple shoots and plant regeneration from seedling explants of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.). Curr Sci. 1998;75:1036–41.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    George L, Eapen S. Organogenesis and embryogenesis from diverse explants in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.). Plant Cell Rep. 1994;13:417–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gupta PK, Varshney RK. The development and use of microsatellite markers for genetic analysis and plant breeding with emphasis on bread wheat. Euphytica. 2000;113:163–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gutierrez OA, Basu S, Saha S, Jenkins JN, Shoemaker DB, Cheatham CL, et al. Genetic distances among selected cotton genotypes and its relationship with F2 performance. Crop Sci. 2002;42:1841–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hashemi SH, Mirmohammadi-Maibody MSA, Nematzadeh GA, Arzani A. Identification of rice hybrids using microsatellite and RAPD markers. Afr J Biotechnol. 2009;8:2094–101.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hipi A, Surahman M, Ilyas S. Seed genetic purity assessment of maize hybrid using microsatellite markers (SSR). Int J Appl Sci Tech. 2013;3:66–71.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huchett BI, Botha FC. Stability and potential use of RAPD markers in sugarcane genealogy. Euphytica. 1995;86:117–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jha SS, Ohri D. Phylogenetic relationships of Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. (Pigeonpea) and its wild relatives based on seed protein profiles. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 1996;43:275–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kassa MT, Penmetsa RV, Carrasquilla-Garcia N, Sarma BK, Datta S, Upadhyaya HD, et al. Genetic patterns of domestication in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) and wild Cajanus relatives. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e39563.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krishna G, Reddy PS, Ramteke PW, Rambab UP, Tawar KB, Bhattacharya P. Agrobacterium mediated genetic transformation of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) for resistance to legume pod borer Helicoverpa armigera. J Crop Sci Biotechnol. 2011;14:197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kumar AS, Ready TP, Ready GM. Multiple shoots from the cultured explants of pigeonpea and Atylosia species. SABRAO J. 1984;16:101–5.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kumar MRC, Vishwanath K, Shivakumar N, Prasad SR, Radha BN. Ramegowda. Utilization of SSR markers for seed purity testing in popular rice hybrids (Oryza sativa L.). Anals. Plant Sci. 2012;1:1–5.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu S, Cantrell RG, McCartyJr JC, McStewart JD. Simple sequence repeat based assessment of genetic diversity in cotton race stock accessions. Crop Sci. 2000;40:1459–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Majumdar S, Banerjee S, De KK. Efficient shoot regeneration in pigeon pea, Cajanus cajan (L) Millisp. using seedling petioles. Curr Sci. 2004;86:30–2.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mallikarjuna N, Saxena K, Lakshmi J, Varshney R, Srikanth S, Jadhav D. Differences between Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh and C. cajanifolius (Haines) van der Maesen, the progenitor species of pigeonpea. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2012;59:411–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mehta U, Mohanram HY. Regeneration of plantlets from the cotyledons of Cajanus cajan. Indian J Exp Biol. 1980;18:800–2.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mishra RR, Sahu A, Rath SC, Mishra SP, Panigrahi J. Cyto-morphological and molecular characterization of Cajanus cajan × C. scarabaeoides F1 hybrid. Nucleus. 2012;55:27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mishra SK, Panigrahi J. Identification of inter-specific hybrid between Cajanus cajan (L.) and C. cajanifolius (H.) using cyto-morphological and DNA markers. Electron J Plant Breed. 2017;8:63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mohan ML, Krishnamurthy KV. Plant regeneration in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) by organogenesis. Plant Cell Rep. 1998;17:705–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mohanty M, Patnaik SN. Cytomorphological analysis of F1 Hybrids between Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. and Atylosia cajanifolia (Haines). Cytologia. 1989;54:121–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant. 1962;15:473–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nadimpalli RJ, Jarret RL, Pathak SC, Kochert G. Phylogenetic relationships of the pigeonpea (C. Cajan) based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Genome. 1993;36:216–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nayak A, Mohanty M, Patnaik SN. Multiple shoot regeneration in Cajanus cajan and Atylosia cajanifolia. Proc Conf Cyto Genet. 1992;3:127–32.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Odeny DA, Jayashree B, Ferguson M, Hoisington D, Crouch J, Gebhardt C. Development, characterization and utilization of microsatellite markers in pigeonpea. Plant Breed. 2007;126:130–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Panigrahi J, Patnaik SN, Kole C. Identification of putative hybrids between pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) and C. cajanifolius using seed protein markers. Indian. J Genet. 2001;61:367–8.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Parani M, Singh KN, Rangasamy S, Ramalingam RS. Identification of Sesamum alatum × Sesamum indicum hybrid using protein, isozyme and RAPD markers. Indian J Genet. 1997;57:381–8.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pundir RPS, Singh RB. Cytogenetics of F1 hybrids between Cajanus and Atylosia species and its phylogenetic implications. Theor Appl Genet. 1985;71:216–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rangasmy P, Krishnakumar JC, Vanniarajan C, Ramalingam J. Heterotic vigour in intergenetic hybrids of pigeonpea for protein and methionine content. Crop Improv. 1991;18:152–3.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shivaprakash N, Pental D, Bhallasarin N. Regeneration of pigeonpea (C. cajan) from cotyledonary node via multiple shoot formation. Plant Cell Rep. 1994;13:623–7.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Singh U, Jambunathan R. Protease inhibitors and in vitro protein digestibility of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) and its wild relatives. J Food Sci Technol. 1981;18:83–5.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sivaramakrishnan S, Seetha K, Rao AN, Singh L. RFLP analysis of cytoplasmic male sterile line of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.) developed by interspecific crosses. Euphytica. 1997;93:307–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Smith JF, Burke CC, Wangner WL. Interspecific hybridization in natural population of Cyrtandra (Gesneriaceae) on the Hawaian islands: evidence from RAPD markers. Plant Syst Evol. 1996;200:61–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Subrahmanyam NC, Kumar PS, Faris DG. Genome relationships in pigeonpea and its implication in crop improvement. In: Gupta PK, Bhal JR, editors. Genetics and crop improvement. Meerut: Rastogi and Co; 1986. p. 309–20.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thiruvengadam V, Muthiah A. Interspecific hybridization between Cajanus cajan and C. cajanifolius. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol. 2007;7:204–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tripathi SN, Patil BD, Shukla GP. Phylogenic and hybridization potentials in Atylosia and Cajanus species. Forage Res. 1984;10:5–9.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    van der Maesen LJG. Pigeonpea: origin, history, evolution and taxonomy. In: Nene YL, Hall SD, Sheila VK, editors. Wallingford, Oxen. UK: CAB International; 1990. p. 15–46.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yadav PBS, Padmaja V. Shoot organogenesis and plantlet regeneration from leaf segments of pigeonpea. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult. 2003;73:197–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Archana Sharma Foundation of Calcutta 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Syeelva Panda
    • 1
  • Sujit Kumar Mishra
    • 1
  • Aparupa Naik
    • 1
  • Sanjat Kumar Sahu
    • 2
  • Jogeswar Panigrahi
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, School of Life SciencesSambalpur UniversitySambalpurIndia
  2. 2.Department of Environmental ScienceSambalpur UniversitySambalpurIndia
  3. 3.Department of Biotechnology, School of Life SciencesCentral University of RajasthanAjmerIndia

Personalised recommendations