Advertisement

Macromolecular Research

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 278–283 | Cite as

pH Sensitive Soft Contact Lens for Selective Drug-Delivery

  • Guenhei Kim
  • Hyeok Jung Kim
  • Hyeran Noh
Article
  • 100 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated contact lenses as drug delivery media and the effect of tear physiological pH on drug release behavior. Anionic or cationic hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) lenses were polymerized with either vinylpyrrolidone (VP) or N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAAm). The pH of artificial tears was prepared as between 5.8 and 8.35. One of common treatments, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), to dry eye disease was used as a test drug. As a result, drug releases from anionic 100% p-HEMA and p-HEMA-VP lens were both increased with increasing tear pH. However, released drug amounts from cationic the p-HEMA-NIPAAm lens were decreased with increasing pH. In weak basicity (pH 8.03), the p-HEMA-VP (20 wt%) lens swelled resulting releasing drugs 3.5 times more compared to in weak acidity (pH 5.80). On the other hand, the p-HEMA-NIPAAm (20 wt%) lens de-swelled in basic solution resulting decreased drug release compared to in acidic solution. The hydrogel contact lenses showed various physical properties and drug releasing properties including diffusion coefficients in response to ionization reactions between ionic groups in the lens and pH of solution. It suggests that hydrogel contact lens has potential as selective drug delivery media.

Keywords

hydrogel contact lens dry eye drug delivery ionic polymer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    C. J. White, A. Tieppo, and M. E. Byrne, J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 21, 369 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    E. Singh, A. D. Katheria, R. Srivastava, U. Kumar, and B. C. Yadav, Imperial J. Int. Res., 6, 336 (2016).Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    F. A. Maulvi, D. H. Lakdawala, A. A. Shaikh, A. R. Desai, H. H. Choksi, R. J. Vaidya, K. M. Ranch, A. R. Koli, B. A. Vyas, and D. O. Shah, J. Control. Release, 226, 47 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    F. J. Holly, Optom. Vis. Sci., 58, 331, (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    C. Alvarez-Lorenzo, H. Hiratani, and A. Concheiro, Am. J. Drug Deliv., 4, 131 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    C. J. White, M. K. McBride, K. M. Pate, A. Tieppo, and M. E. Byrne, Biomaterials, 32, 5698 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    J. B. Ciolino, T. R. Hoare, N. G. Iwata, I. Behlau, C. H. Dohlman, R. Langer, and D. S. Kohane, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 50, 3346 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Y. Fernando, C. Angel, and A. L. Carmen, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 69, 1094 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    J. Kim, A. Conway, and A. Chauhan, Biomaterials, 29, 2259 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    S. A. V. I. T. A. Gambhire, K. A. R. U. N. A. Bhalerao, and S. U. S. H. M. A. Singh, Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci., 5, 27 (2013).Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    L. Verestiuc, O. Nastasescu, E. Barbu, I. Sarvaiya, K. L. Green, and J. Tsibouklis, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A, 77, 726 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    F. A. Maulvi, T. G. Soni, and D. O. Shah, J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed., 26, 1035 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    A. Tieppo, C. J. White, A. C. Paine, M. L. Voyles, M. K. McBride, and M. E. Byrne, J. Control. Release, 157, 391 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Y. Qiu and K. Park, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 53, 321 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    H. J. Jung and A. Chauhan, Biomaterials, 33, 2289 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    P. Paradiso, R. Galante, L. Santos, A. P. Alves de Matos, R. Colaco, A. P. Serro, and B. Saramago, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater., 102, 1170 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    M. B. Abelson, I. J. Udell, and J. H. Weston, Arch. Ophthalmol., 99, 301 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    M. Yamada, H. Mochizuki, M. Kawai, M. Yoshino, and Y. Mashima, Current Eye Res., 16, 482 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    M. S. Norn, Acta Ophthalmol., 66, 485 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    J. E. M. Thygesen and O. L. Jensen, Acta Ophthalmol., 65, 134 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    W. I. Rhim,, H. S. Lee, Y. S. Yun, and H. J. Choi, J. Korean Ophthalmol. Soc., 44, 931 (2003).Google Scholar
  22. (22).
    C. Alvarez-Lorenzo, H. Hiratani, J. L. Gómez-Amoza, R. Martínez-Pacheco, C. Souto, and A. Concheiro, J. Pharm. Sci., 91, 2182 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    A. Mahomed, J. S. Wolffsohn, and B. J. Tighe, Contact Lens Anterior Eye, 39, 97 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    P. L. Ritger and N. Peppas, J. Control. Release, 5, 23 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    R. W. Korsmeyer and N. A. Peppas, J. Membr. Sci., 9, 211 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    K. Cai, Y. Huang, and J. L. Yang, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 88, 3332 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. (27).
    D. Ray, P. K. Sahoo, and G. P. Mohanta, Asian J. Pharm., 4, 123 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. (28).
    R. Zhang, M. Tang, A. Bowyer, R. Eisenthal, and J. Hubble, Biomaterials., 26, 4677 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. (29).
    H. Wei, S. X. Cheng, X. Z. Zhang, and R. X. Zhuo, Prog. Polym. Sci., 34, 893 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. (30).
    H. H. Bearat, B. H. Lee, J. Valdez, and B. L. Vernon, J. Biomater. Sci., 22, 1299 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. (31).
    B. Kim and N. A. Peppas, Biomed. Microdevices, 5, 333 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. (32).
    P. L. Ritger and N. Peppas, J. Control. Release, 5, 23 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. (33).
    V. Martín-Montañez, A. López-Miguel, C. Arroyo, M. E. Mateo, J. M. González-Méijome, M. Calonge, and M. J. González-García, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater., 102, 764 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    H. R. Noh, Polym. Korea, 36, 190 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Polymer Society of Korea and Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Convergence Institute of Biomedical Eng. & BiomaterialSeoul National University of Science and TechnologySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of OptometrySeoul National University of Science and TechnologySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations