Abstract
The goal of this paper is to describe the relationship between generalized B-opers, generalized \(\mathrm {SO}(2n,{\mathbb {C}})\)-opers and (G, P)-opers. In particular, we show that to each generalized B-oper there is a naturally associated (G, P)-oper, but there are some (G, P)-opers that do not arise as generalized B-opers or \(\mathrm {SO}(2n,{\mathbb {C}})\)-opers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
I. Biswas, “Coupled connections on a compact riemann surface,”(2003) .
I. Biswas, L. P. Schaposnik, and M. Yang, “Generalized B-Opers,” arXiv:1911.11842.
I. Biswas, L. P. Schaposnik, and M. Yang, “On the generalized SO(2n,C)-opers,” arXiv:2005.08446.
B. Collier and A. Sanders, “(G,P)-opers and global Slodowy slices,” arXiv:1911.12844.
W. Fulton and J. Harris, Representation theory. Springer study edition. Springer, New York, NY [u.a.], 2004. Includes bibliographical references and index.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Indranil Biswas.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, M. A comparison of generalized opers and (G, P)-opers. Indian J Pure Appl Math 53, 760–773 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13226-021-00170-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13226-021-00170-0