Skip to main content
Log in

Phylogeny, morphology and pathogenicity of Diaporthe and Phomopsis species on almond in Portugal

  • Published:
Fungal Diversity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ascomycete genus Diaporthe includes plant pathogens and endophytes on a wide range of hosts including economically important crops. Anamorphs are coelomycetous and reside in the genus Phomopsis. Phomopsis amygdali is the causal agent of twig canker and blight of almonds. In a recent survey of dieback of almonds in Portugal, the most frequent fungi detected were Diaporthe/Phomopsis species. Isolates from almond and other Prunus species were characterised and grouped according to their microsatellite-primed PCR (MSP-PCR) profiles and representatives of the different groups were selected for a phylogenetic study based on the ITS rDNA region (ITS1–5.8S–ITS2). Combining morphological, cultural, molecular and pathogenicity data, three species were distinguished. Phomopsis amygdali was shown to be the main pathogen on almond and is epitypified in the present work. Diaporthe neotheicola is reported for the first time on this host. A third species represented by a single isolate could not be unequivocally identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adaskaveg JE, Forster H, Connell JH (1999) First report of fruit rot and associated branch dieback of almond in California caused by a Phomopsis species tentatively identified as P. amygdali. Plant Dis 83:1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves A, Correia A, Luque J, Phillips AJL (2004) Botryosphaeria corticola sp. nov. on Quercus species, with notes and description of Botryosphaeria stevensii and its anamorph Diplodia mutila. Mycologia 96:598–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canonaco A (1936) Il seccume dei rameti di mandorlo in relazione ad alcuni micromiceti. Riv Patol Veget 26:145–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Curzi M (1927) De novis theae micromycetibus pathogenis. Atti Ist Bot Univ Pavia 3:59–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Delacroix G (1905) Sur une maladie des amandiers en Provence. Bull Trimest Soc Mycol Fr 21:180–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Dias MRS, Lucas MT, Lopes MC (1982) Fungi Lusitaniae XXIX. Agron Lusit 41:175–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr DF, Castlebury LA, Pardo-Schultheiss R (1999) Phomopsis amygdali causes peach shoot blight of cultivated peach trees in the southeastern United States. Mycologia 91:1008–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farr DF, Castlebury LA, Rossman A (2002) Morphological and molecular characterization of Phomopsis vaccinii and additional isolates of Phomopsis from blueberry and cranberry in the eastern United States. Mycologia 94:494–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo F (1973) L’Albicocco “Tonda di Costigliole”, nuovo ospite di Fusicoccum amygdali Del. Informatore Fitopatologico 23:13–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde KD, Zhang Y (2008) Epitypification: should we epitypify? J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 9:842–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanematsu S, Yokoyama Y, Kobayashi T (1999) Taxonomic reassessment of the causal fungus of peach Fusicoccum canker in Japan. Ann Phytopathol Soc Jpn 65:531–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanematsu S, Minaka N, Kobayashi T, Kudo A, Ohtsu Y (2000) Molecular phylogenetic analysis on ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer regions and comparison of fertility in Phomopsis isolates from fruit trees. J Gen Plant Pathol 66:191–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer W, Mitchell TG, Freedman EZ, Vilgalys R (1993) Hybridization probes for conventional DNA fingerprinting used as single primers in the polymerase chain reaction to distinguish strains of Cryptococcus neoformans. J Clin Microbiol 31:2274–2280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mostert L, Crous PW, Kang JC, Phillips AJL (2001) Species of Phomopsis and a Libertella sp. occurring on grapevines with specific reference to South Africa: morphological, cultural, molecular and pathological characterization. Mycologia 93:146–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson RH, Kristiansson E, Ryberg M, Hallenberg N, Larsson K-H (2008) Intraspecific ITS variability in the kingdom fungi as expressed in the international sequence databases and its implications for molecular species identification. Evol Bioinformatics 4:193–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantidou ME (1973) Fungus-host index for Greece. Benaki Phytopathol Inst, Kiphissia, Athens

  • Phillips AJL, Oudemans PV, Correia A, Alves A (2006) Characterization and epitypification of Botryosphaeria corticis, the cause of blueberry cane canker. Fungal Divers 21:141–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehner SA, Uecker FA (1994) Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer phylogeny and host diversity in the coelomycete Phomopsis. Can J Bot 72:1666–1674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santos JM, Phillips AJL (2009) Resolving the complex of Diaporthe (Phomopsis) species occurring on Foeniculum vulgare in Portugal. Fungal Divers 34:111–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos JM, Correia VG, Phillips AJL (2010) Primers for mating-type diagnosis in Diaporthe and Phomopsis: their use in teleomorph induction in vitro and biological species definition. Fungal Biol 114:255–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trigui A (1968) Sur la présence en Tunisie de Fusicoccum amygdali Delacroix sur Amandier. Bull ENSAT 18/19:65–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuset JJ, Portilla MT (1989) Taxonomic status of Fusicoccum amygdali and Phomopsis amygdalina. Can J Bot 67:1275–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uddin W, Stevenson KL (1997) Pathogenicity of a species of Phomopsis causing a shoot blight on peach in Georgia and evaluation of possible infection courts. Plant Dis 81:983–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uecker FA (1988) A world list of Phomopsis names with notes on nomenclature, morphology and biology. Mycologia Memoir 13:1–231

    Google Scholar 

  • van Niekerk LM, Groenewald JZ, Farr DF, Fourie PH, Hallen F, Crous PW (2005) Reassessment of Phomopsis species on grapevine. Australas Plant Pathol 34:27–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Rensburg JCJ, Lamprecht SC, Groenewald JZ, Castebury LA, Crous PW (2006) Characterization of Phomopsis spp. associated with die-back of rooibos (Aspalathus linearis) in South Africa. Stud Mycol 55:65–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financed by the European Regional Development Fund and Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) under the project PTDC/AGR-AAM/67064/2006 and J. Santos was supported by a research grant within the project. A. Phillips was supported by grant number SFRH/BCC/15810/2006 from FCT. João Inácio (Laboratório Nacional de Investigação Veterinária, Instituto Nacional de Recursos Biológicos, I.P.) helped with the construction of the MSP-PCR dendrogram, and Cecília Rego (Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Laboratório de Patologia Vegetal “Veríssimo de Almeida”) provided bibliographic material.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugénio L. F. Diogo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diogo, E.L.F., Santos, J.M. & Phillips, A.J.L. Phylogeny, morphology and pathogenicity of Diaporthe and Phomopsis species on almond in Portugal. Fungal Diversity 44, 107–115 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-010-0057-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-010-0057-x

Keywords

Navigation