Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare Injection Ferric Carboxymaltose and Oral Iron in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia During Pregnancy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in pregnancy has a prevalence as high as 40–60% in different countries of the world. Oral iron is used to treat his commonest medical disorder in pregnancy. Ferrous sulphate is associated with considerable side effects. Ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) is a newer iron preparation which allows for single and higher dose (up to 1000 mg) of IV iron infusion. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of FCM and FS in treating IDA during pregnancy.

Methods

A randomised control trial was done at a tertiary care centres involving 362 women (181 women each in FS and FCM group). The pregnant anemic women with IDA were enrolled between 18 and 34 weeks of pregnancy. They were given 1000 mg of FCM iv as single dose or were given FS tablets twice daily (120 mg iron daily). The data were collected for rise in the Hb and serum ferritin over a period of 6 weeks.

Results

Nine and 18 patients were lost to follow-up in the FCM and FS group, respectively. The data were analysed as per protocol analysis. FCM group women showed 2.6 gm% rise in Hb compared to 1.7 gm% of FS group. One hundred and sixty-six out of 172 women in FS group achieved anemia correction at 6 weeks. No difference was observed in the neonatal outcome. No major side effects were observed in the either group.

Conclusion

In our study, FCM was more effective than oral FS in increasing Hb in women with IDA during pregnancy. This clinical benefit with FCM was achieved without the concerns for safety and tolerability of the drug.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balarajan Y, Ramakrishnan U, Ozaltin E, et al. Anaemia in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2011;378(9809):2123–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. WHO. The global prevalence of anaemia in 2011. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Qassim A, Mol BW, Grivell RM, et al. Safety and efficacy of intravenous iron polymaltose, iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose in pregnancy: a systematic review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;58(1):22–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nair M, Churchill D, Robinson S, et al. Association between maternal haemoglobin and stillbirth: a cohort study among a multi-ethnic population in England. Br J Haematol. 2017;179:829–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Toteja GS, Singh P, Dhillon BS, et al. Prevalence of anemia among pregnant women and adolescent girls in 16 districts of India. Food Nutr Bull. 2006;27(4):311–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rai RK, Fawzi WW, Barik A, et al. The burden of iron-deficiency anaemia among women in India: how have iron and folic acid interventions fared? WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2018;7:18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Breymann C, Milman N, Mezzacasa A, FER-ASAP Investigators, et al. Ferric carboxymaltose vs. oral iron in the treatment of pregnant women with iron deficiency anemia: an international, open-label, randomized controlled trial (FER-ASAP). J Perinat Med. 2017;45(4):443–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mwangi MN, Mzembe G, Moya E, et al. Protocol for a multicentre, parallel-group, open-label randomised controlled trial comparing ferric carboxymaltose with the standard of care in anaemic Malawian pregnant women: the REVAMP trial. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e053288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jose A, Mahey R, Sharma JB, et al. Comparison of ferric Carboxymaltose and iron sucrose complex for treatment of iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy-randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childb. 2019;19:54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Froessler B, Gajic T, Dekker G, et al. Treatment of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia with intravenous ferric carboxymaltose in pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;298:75–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. DeLoughery TG. Safety of oral and intravenous iron. Acta Haematol. 2019;142:8–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pels A, Ganzevoort W. Safety and efficacy of ferric carboxymaltose in anemic pregnant women: a retrospective case control study. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2015;2015:728952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study concept: SC and AS. Study conduct: SC, AS, AHA, and DJ. Drafting and manuscript revision: SC and AS. Statistical analysis: AS, CHA, and DJ. Study supervision: SC.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sushil Chawla.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee at AFMC, Pune, and I certify that the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chawla, S., Singh, A., Jhamb, D. et al. A Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare Injection Ferric Carboxymaltose and Oral Iron in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia During Pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol India 72, 492–496 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-022-01653-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-022-01653-8

Keywords

Navigation