Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maternal and Perinatal Outcome of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) in Patients with Eclampsia at Tertiary Health Care Centre

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) and the related term reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome (RPLS) denote a constellation of clinical symptoms paired with key radiological findings. Eclampsia associated with PRES is a rare condition and remains a challenging diagnosis to make. There are only a few studies regarding PRES syndrome with a limited sample size. Our institution is a tertiary referral centre; hence, a good sample size of patients with eclampsia complicated with PRES syndrome is seen in our study. The objective was to identify the maternal and neonatal outcomes in PRES with eclampsia.

Methods

This study is a prospective observational study done in Government Medical College, Aurangabad, India from October 2018 to September 2020. In the present study, we have enrolled 63 cases, who satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria during two years. All women admitted in the labour room of tertiary health care centre diagnosed with eclampsia with neurological symptoms during the study period were studied. Relevant data were obtained from the case file and compiled by common proforma. Analysis was done by SPSS (Statistical package for social sciences) Version 25th.

Results

In patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PRES with eclampsia(n = 63), the mean age of the patient was 20.74 ± 2.04 years, 23 (36.5%) patients had headache as premonitory symptoms, whereas 13(20.6%)patients had visual disturbances as the premonitory symptom. The mean gestational age at presentation was 34.4 ± 2 weeks. 40(63.5%) patients were showing parieto-occipital region changes, and 24(38.1%) subjects were showing only occipital region involvement in CT brain. 12 (19.04%) subjects were diagnosed with HELLP syndrome as a maternal complication, 07 (11.1%) subjects had Abruptio placentae. 26(41.3%) babies needed NICU admission, and 4 (6.3%) babies had neonatal death.

Conclusion

In pregnant patients presenting with seizure and neurological symptoms, a possibility of PRES should be considered. Proper diagnosis requires careful attention to clinical and radiographic presentation. In eclampsia with PRES patients, a timely intervention with anti-hypertensive, anti-cerebral oedema measures as well as management of other associated symptoms are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hinchey J, Chaves C, Appignani B, et al. A reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:494–5002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mayama M, Uno K, Tano S, Yoshihara M, Ukai M, Kishigami Y, et al. Incidence of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in eclamptic and women with preeclampsia with neurologic symptoms. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:239.e1-239.e15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Junewar V, Verma R, Sankhwar PL, et al. Neuroimaging features and predictors of outcome in eclamptic encephalopathy: a prospective observational study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:1728–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alhilali LM, Reynolds AR, Fakhran S. A multi-disciplinary model of risk factors for fatal outcome in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. J Neurol Sci. 2014;347:59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bartynski WS, Boardman JF. Distinct imaging patterns and lesion distribution in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(7):1320–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brewer J, Owens MY, Wallace K, et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in 46 of 47 patients with eclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:468.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bembalgi S, Vishal Kamate S, Shruthi KR. A study of eclampsia cases associated with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(7):05–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sardesai S, Dabade R, Deshmukh S, et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES): evolving the mystery of eclampsia ! J Obstet Gynecol India. 2019;69:334–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dora SK, Nayak L, Pande B, Dandapat AB. A prospective observational study for the evaluation of maternal and fetal outcome in patient with eclampsia. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;5:1785–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Karanth S, Gonsalves K, Sheela CN, Mathew R, Sarma GRK, Phillip B, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcome in eclampsia complicated by posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome; a three years’ experience in a tertiary care hospital. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6:5044–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Anjan T, Ankur S, Rakesha K. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. J of Obstet Anaesth Crit Care. 2014;4(2):50–2.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chhabra A, Jagtap S. Postpartum seizures with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome following cesarean delivery for triplets. J Obstet Anaesth Crit Care. 2014;4(1):50–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rodrigo P, Paul EM, Joseph V. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: a review. Crit Care Shock. 2009;12:135–43.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hinchey J, Chaves C, Appignani B, Breen J, Pao L, Wang A, et al. A reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(8):494–500.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Xuan H, Jinfeng X, Zao C, Guoliang L, Hong J. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with involvement of the cervical cord and medulla: a case report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(1):CD01-2.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cipolla MJ, Sweet JG, Chan SL. Cerebral vascular adaptation to pregnancy and its role in the neurological complications of eclampsia. J Appl Physiol. 2011;110(2):329–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vinod SP, Dhamangaonkar BR, Pattanshetti RC, Patil MM. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in early postpartum women: a case report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(4):RD01-2.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sinha M, Sinha SK. Perinatal and maternal outcomes of eclampsia in Darbhanga District, Bihar, India. Int J Contemp Med Res. 2018;5(2):B1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2015) Emergent therapy for acute-onset, severe hypertension with preeclampsia or eclampsia. ACOG Committee Opinion no. 623

  20. Fisher N, Saraf S, Egbert N, Homel P, Stein EG, Minkoff H. Clinical correlates of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in pregnancy. J Clin Hypertens. 2016;18(6):522–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ibrahim NMAM, Manal EB. MRI imaging of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome associated with pregnancy. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2014;45(2):505–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stevens CJ, Heran MKS. The many faces of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Br J of Radiol. 2012;85:1566–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Haque H, Thapa K. Maternal and fetal outcome in eclampsia: a study from tertiary care hospital. JNGMC. 2017;15(2):6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pannu D, Das B, Hazari P. Shilpa, Maternal and perinatal outcome in eclampsia and factors affecting the outcome: a study in North Indian population. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2014;3(2):347–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bernstein IM, Horbar JD, Badger GJ, Ohlsson A, Golan A. Morbidity and mortality among very-low-birth-weight neonates with intrauterine growth restriction. The vermont Oxford network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(00)70513-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumari A, Mundle S, Fuse S. Maternal and neonatal outcome in eclampsia in a tertiary care hospital India. JMSCR. 2017;05(06):23522–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Konar H, Agarwal L, Priyanka P, Chaudhuri S. Management of posterior reversible syndrome in preeclamptic women. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2021;71(3):318–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fang X, Liang Y, Zhang W, Wang Q, Chen J, Chen J, Lin Y, Chen Y, Yu L, Wang H, Chen D. Serum neurofilament light: a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in obstetric posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Mol Neurobiol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-021-02562-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mai H, Liang Z, Chen Z, et al. MRI characteristics of brain edema in preeclampsia/eclampsia patients with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:669. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Varsha Deshmukh MD, FICOG, FMAS.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of intrest.

Ethical approval

Ethical comittee approval was obtained from the ethical committee of Govt Medical College, Aurangabad. (Pharma/IEC-GMCA/46/2018).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Varsha Deshmukh is a Professor at the Department of OBGY, GMC and Cancer Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India; Vikas R Gangurde is Chief Resident, Department of OBGY, GMC, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deshmukh, V., Gangurde, V.R. & Gadappa, S. Maternal and Perinatal Outcome of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) in Patients with Eclampsia at Tertiary Health Care Centre. J Obstet Gynecol India 72 (Suppl 1), 192–197 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-021-01585-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-021-01585-9

Keywords

Navigation