Skip to main content
Log in

Predictive Model for Late Stillbirth Among Antenatal Hypertensive Women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstracts

Objective

To develop a predictive model for late stillbirth among women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) in low- and middle-income countries.

Materials and Methods

Study was part of the WHO newborn birth defect (NBBD) project and included all stillbirths occurring in the facility from November 2015 to December 2020. The age and parity matched subjects with HDP having live birth were taken as controls. All significant predictors were analyzed and a predictive model was developed.

Results

Out of 69,007 deliveries, 1691(24.5/1000) were stillborn. HDP was seen in (390/1691, 23.0%), in 265/390 (67.4%) cases it occurred at or after 28 weeks of gestation and were included as cases. On comparing the cases with controls, the significant factors were estimated fetal weight less than 2000 gms (P < 0.001, OR 10.3), poor antenatal care (p < 0.001, OR–5.9), family history of hypertension (p < 0.018, OR-4.4) and the presence of gestational hypertension (p = 0.001, OR 2.2). The predictive model had sensitivity and specificity of 80.3% and 70.03%, respectively, the receiver operating curve showed the area under the curve(AUC) in the range of good prediction (0.846).

Conclusion

The predictive model could play a potential role in stillbirth prevention in women with HDP in low- and middle-income countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Hypertension in pregnancy Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(5):1122–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saleem S, Tikmani SS, McClure EM, et al. Trends and determinants of stillbirth in developing countries: results from the Global Network’s Population-Based Birth Registry. Reprod Health. 2018;15(Suppl 1):100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Singh A, Kumar M. An Analysis of Cause of Stillbirth in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Delhi: A Contribution to the WHO SEARO Project. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019;69(2):155–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu L-C, Wang Y-C, MuHsien Yu, et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in different trimesters of pregnancy a systematic review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;53:141–5.

  5. Goldenberg RL, McClure EM, Saleem S, et al. Infection-related stillbirths. Lancet. 2010;6736(09):61712–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Akolekar R, Machuca M, Mendes M, et al. Prediction of stillbirth from placental growth factor at 11–13 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:618–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17288.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yerlikaya G, Akolekar R, McPherson K, Syngelaki A, H NK. Prediction of stillbirth from maternal demographic and pregnancy characteristics. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;48(5):607–612.

  8. Mastrodima S, Akolekar R, Yerlikaya G, Tzelepis T, Nicolaides K Prediction of stillbirth from biochemical and biophysical markers at 11–13 weeks. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 48 (2016).

  9. Antwi E, Amoakoh-Coleman M, Vieira DL, et al. Systematic review of prediction models for gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(4): e0230955. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230955.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Acog practice bulletin no. 102: Management of stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(3):748–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Villar J, Cheikh Ismail L, Victora CG, et al. International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet. 2014;384:857–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar M, Vajala R, Bhutia P, et al. Factors contributing to late stillbirth among women with pregnancy hypertension in a developing country. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2020;12:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar M, Singh A, Garg R, et al. Hypertension during pregnancy and risk of stillbirth: challenges in a developing country. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;25:1–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Koivu A, Sairanen M. Predicting risk of stillbirth and preterm pregnancies with machine learning. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2020;8:14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13755-020-00105-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kayode GA, Grobbee DE, Amoakoh-Coleman M, et al. Predicting stillbirth in a low resource setting. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Project has been funded by WHO SEARO. We are thankful to Mr. Yogember Negi for his contribution as a computer data operator of the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manisha Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no relevant financial, personal, political, intellectual or religious interests among authors to disclose.

Ethical Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Manisha Kumar, Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi. V Ravi, Assistant Professor, Department of Statistics, Lady Sri Ram College, New Delhi. Deepika Meena, Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi. Kanika Chopra, Assistant Professor , Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi. Shilpi Nain, Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi. Manju Puri, Director Professor and HOD, Department of Obstetrics and gynecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 13 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, M., Ravi, V., Meena, D. et al. Predictive Model for Late Stillbirth Among Antenatal Hypertensive Women. J Obstet Gynecol India 72 (Suppl 1), 96–101 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-021-01561-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-021-01561-3

Keywords

Navigation