Abstracts
Objective
To develop a predictive model for late stillbirth among women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) in low- and middle-income countries.
Materials and Methods
Study was part of the WHO newborn birth defect (NBBD) project and included all stillbirths occurring in the facility from November 2015 to December 2020. The age and parity matched subjects with HDP having live birth were taken as controls. All significant predictors were analyzed and a predictive model was developed.
Results
Out of 69,007 deliveries, 1691(24.5/1000) were stillborn. HDP was seen in (390/1691, 23.0%), in 265/390 (67.4%) cases it occurred at or after 28 weeks of gestation and were included as cases. On comparing the cases with controls, the significant factors were estimated fetal weight less than 2000 gms (P < 0.001, OR 10.3), poor antenatal care (p < 0.001, OR–5.9), family history of hypertension (p < 0.018, OR-4.4) and the presence of gestational hypertension (p = 0.001, OR 2.2). The predictive model had sensitivity and specificity of 80.3% and 70.03%, respectively, the receiver operating curve showed the area under the curve(AUC) in the range of good prediction (0.846).
Conclusion
The predictive model could play a potential role in stillbirth prevention in women with HDP in low- and middle-income countries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Hypertension in pregnancy Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(5):1122–31.
Saleem S, Tikmani SS, McClure EM, et al. Trends and determinants of stillbirth in developing countries: results from the Global Network’s Population-Based Birth Registry. Reprod Health. 2018;15(Suppl 1):100.
Singh A, Kumar M. An Analysis of Cause of Stillbirth in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Delhi: A Contribution to the WHO SEARO Project. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019;69(2):155–60.
Liu L-C, Wang Y-C, MuHsien Yu, et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in different trimesters of pregnancy a systematic review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;53:141–5.
Goldenberg RL, McClure EM, Saleem S, et al. Infection-related stillbirths. Lancet. 2010;6736(09):61712–8.
Akolekar R, Machuca M, Mendes M, et al. Prediction of stillbirth from placental growth factor at 11–13 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:618–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17288.
Yerlikaya G, Akolekar R, McPherson K, Syngelaki A, H NK. Prediction of stillbirth from maternal demographic and pregnancy characteristics. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;48(5):607–612.
Mastrodima S, Akolekar R, Yerlikaya G, Tzelepis T, Nicolaides K Prediction of stillbirth from biochemical and biophysical markers at 11–13 weeks. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 48 (2016).
Antwi E, Amoakoh-Coleman M, Vieira DL, et al. Systematic review of prediction models for gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(4): e0230955. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230955.
Acog practice bulletin no. 102: Management of stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(3):748–61.
Villar J, Cheikh Ismail L, Victora CG, et al. International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet. 2014;384:857–68.
Kumar M, Vajala R, Bhutia P, et al. Factors contributing to late stillbirth among women with pregnancy hypertension in a developing country. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2020;12:1–7.
Kumar M, Singh A, Garg R, et al. Hypertension during pregnancy and risk of stillbirth: challenges in a developing country. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;25:1–7.
Koivu A, Sairanen M. Predicting risk of stillbirth and preterm pregnancies with machine learning. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2020;8:14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13755-020-00105-9.
Kayode GA, Grobbee DE, Amoakoh-Coleman M, et al. Predicting stillbirth in a low resource setting. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:274.
Acknowledgements
The Project has been funded by WHO SEARO. We are thankful to Mr. Yogember Negi for his contribution as a computer data operator of the project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There are no relevant financial, personal, political, intellectual or religious interests among authors to disclose.
Ethical Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Manisha Kumar, Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi. V Ravi, Assistant Professor, Department of Statistics, Lady Sri Ram College, New Delhi. Deepika Meena, Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi. Kanika Chopra, Assistant Professor , Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi. Shilpi Nain, Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi. Manju Puri, Director Professor and HOD, Department of Obstetrics and gynecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, M., Ravi, V., Meena, D. et al. Predictive Model for Late Stillbirth Among Antenatal Hypertensive Women. J Obstet Gynecol India 72 (Suppl 1), 96–101 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-021-01561-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-021-01561-3