Advertisement

The Role of MGIT 960 Culture Medium in Resolving the Diagnostic Dilemma for Genital Tuberculosis Patients Presenting with Infertility

  • Nidhi Jindal
  • Shalini Gainder
  • Lakhbir Kaur Dhaliwal
  • Sunil Sethi
Original Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) 960 culture medium for the diagnosis of genital tuberculosis (GTB) in women presenting with infertility.

Methods

The premenstrual endometrial biopsy samples in 300 women presenting with primary and secondary infertility were subjected to AFB smear method, histopathological examination and culture on LJ and MGIT 960 media. Detection rates were compared for diagnostic modalities and their combinations.

Results

In total, 30 cases were positive for genital tuberculosis by either of the four tests employed. The detection rates for AFB smear, MGIT culture, LJ culture and HPE were 50, 46.7, 3.3 and 33.3%, respectively. A combination of smear examination for AFB, MGIT 960 culture and histopathological examination was able to detect all the positive cases. A combination of MGIT and LJ media provided no added advantage over MGIT alone since the only case where LJ culture was positive had been detected by positive MGIT culture. In as many as five positive cases (16.7%), only MGIT culture was positive.

Conclusion

The addition of MGIT 960 culture medium to routine battery of investigations in infertility patients significantly improves the diagnosis.

Keywords

Genital tuberculosis Infertility Culture MGIT 960 Diagnosis 

Notes

Authors’ Contributions

Study was conceptualized and designed by LKD and SS. The data were collected, analyzed and interpreted by NJ and SG. The drafting of the manuscript was done by NJ.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    WHO. Global Tuberculosis Control Report. WHO 2015.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sharma JB. Current diagnosis and management of female genital tuberculosis. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2015;65(6):362–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bose M. Female genital tract tuberculosis: how long will it elude diagnosis? Indian J Med Res. 2011;134(1):13–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chaman-Ara K, Bahrami MA, Bahrami E, et al. Prevalence of genital tuberculosis among infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2016;5(4):208–15.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Asha B, Hansali N, Manila K, et al. Genital tuberculosis in infertile women: assessment of endometrial TB PCR results with laparoscopic and hysteroscopic features. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2011;61(3):301–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thangappah RBP, Paramasivan CN, Narayanan S. Evaluating PCR, culture & histopathology in the diagnosis of female genital tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res. 2011;134(1):40–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Neonakis IK, Spandidos DA, Petinaki E. Female genital tuberculosis: a review. Scand J Infect Dis. 2011;43:564–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gupta N, Sharma JB, Mittal S, et al. Genital tuberculosis in Indian infertility patients. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2007;97(2):135–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Valsangkar S, Bodhare T, Bele S, et al. An evaluation of the effect of infertility on marital, sexual satisfaction indices and health-related quality of life in women. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011;4(2):80–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sorlozano A, Soria I, Roman J, et al. Comparative evaluation of three culture methods for the isolation of mycobacteria from clinical samples. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;19(10):1259–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rodrigues C, Shenai S, Sadani M, et al. Evaluation of the bactec MGIT 960 TB system for recovery and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in a high through put tertiary care centre. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2009;27(3):217–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jobayer M, Shamsuzzaman SM, Mamun KZ. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in smear negative sputum by PCR. Bangladesh J Med Microbiol. 2012;06(02):02–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nidhi Jindal
    • 1
  • Shalini Gainder
    • 2
  • Lakhbir Kaur Dhaliwal
    • 2
  • Sunil Sethi
    • 3
  1. 1.Mahatma Gandhi Medical Services ComplexKhaneri, Rampur, District ShimlaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchChandigarhIndia
  3. 3.Department of MicrobiologyPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations