Skip to main content
Log in

Use of Hysteroscopy in Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: An Edge Over Histopathological Examination

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of the Study

To assess the efficacy of hysteroscopy in diagnosis of AUB.

Method

A total of 56 women in reproductive and peri-menopausal age group (20–50 years) with complaints of abnormal uterine bleeding were enrolled in the study. All the patients underwent hysteroscopic examination followed by biopsy/histopathological evaluation. Hysteroscopic findings were compared against histopathological findings. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of hysteroscopy were calculated.

Results

Mean age of patients was 36.4 ± 7.6. Majority (60.7%) presented within 6 months of complaints. Clinically, 66.1% were diagnosed as menorrhagia, 30.4% polymenorrhoea and 3.6% intermenstrual bleeding. Hysteroscopically 53.6% presented with abnormal pathology, it diagnosed polyps in 16.1%, calcification in 12.5%, submucous fibroma in 10.7%, necrotic mass in 7.1%, adhesion and forgotten IUCD in 5.4% cases each. However, on histopathology, 33 (58.9%) cases had normal/proliferative/atrophic endometrium, 12 (21.4%) had hyperplasia, 7 (12.5%) had calcified endometrium, and 12 (21.4%) had polyp. No significant difference between two modalities was observed with respect to number of normal/proliferative/atrophic endometrium (p = 0.185). Histopathology diagnosed hyperplasia in significantly higher proportion of patients as compared to hysteroscopy (p = 0.042). Hysteroscopy diagnosed significantly higher proportion of patients with submucous myoma (p = 0.012) and necrotic mass (p = 0.042). Statistically, no significant difference between two modalities was observed with respect to other pathologies (p > 0.05). Overall agreement between two modalities was 62.5%. For pathological abnormalities in general, hysteroscopy had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy values of 78.3, 63.6, 60, 80.8 and 69.6%, respectively.

Conclusion

Hysteroscopy provided additional information for some of the pathologies, otherwise remaining undiagnosed by HPE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Munro MG, Critchley HO, Broder MS, Fraser IS. FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;113:3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Frick KD, Clark MA, Steinbach’s DM, Langenberg P, Stovall D, Munro MG, Dickersin K, STOP-DUB Research Group. Financial and quality-of-life burden of dysfunctional uterine bleeding among women agreeing to obtain surgical treatment. Women’s Health Issues. 2009;19(1):70–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Veena BT, Shivalingaiah N. Role of transvaginal sonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding. J Clin Diagn Res JCDR. 2014;8(12):OC06–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jain M, Kanhere A, Jain AK. Abnormal uterine bleeding: a critical analysis of two diagnostic methods. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2014;3(1):48–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goyal BK, Gaur I, Sharma S, et al. Transvaginal sonography versus hysteroscopy in evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding. Med J Armed Forces India. 2015;71(2):120–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Razzes A, Shankar-ud-Din S, Soomro N. Role of diagnostic hysteroscopy in case of abnormal uterine bleeding. Pak J Surg. 2011;27(4):309–15.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mukhopadhyay SR, Ashis K. Correlation between diagnostic hysteroscopy and its histopathological examination in the evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding. Indian J Prev Soc Med. 2015;45(1–2):62–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Katke RD, Zarariya AN. Use of diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding in perimenopausal age group and its clinicopathological co-relation with ultrasound and histopathology findings: experience in a tertiary care institute. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4(2):413–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guin G, Sandhu SK, Lele A, et al. Hysteroscopy in evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2011;61(5):546–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bredholt G, Mannelqvist M, Stefansson IM, et al. Tumor necrosis is an important hallmark of aggressive endometrial cancer and associates with hypoxia, angiogenesis and inflammation responses. Oncotarget. 2015;6(37):39676–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nandan N, Manjeera L, Rai S, et al. Diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding and it’s histopathologic correlation: our experience. NUJHS. 2013;3(2):2249–7110.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Singh S, Taneja BK, Singh P, et al. Role of diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2014;3(3):544–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Patil SG, Bhute SB, Inamdar SA, et al. Role of diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding and its histopathologic correlation. J Gynecol Endosc Surg. 2009;1(2):98–104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Valson H, Kulkarni C, Mukerjee S, et al. The role of diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding and its histopathological correlation following blind dilatation and curettage. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(3):609–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sunitha C, Somalatha R. Clinical study of diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding and its histopathological correlation. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2013;5(3):43–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dinić SPT, Kopitović V, Antić V, et al. Role of hysteroscopy in evaluation of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis. 2011;28(3):177–81.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chaudhari KR, Sathe P. Role of diagnostic hysteroscopy in evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding and its histopathological correlation. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2014;3(3):666–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fernandes G, Patil A, Samant PY, et al. Endometrial osseous metaplasia. J Postgrad Gynecol Obstet. 2014;1(8). Available from: http://www.jpgo.org/2014/08/endometrial-osseous-metaplasia.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parul Sinha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Nidhi Yadav, Dr. Parul Sinha, Dr. Uma Gupta declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional ethical committee on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Additional information

Dr. Parul Sinha is the Assistant Professor (Obst. & Gynae) at the Era’s Lucknow Medical College, Lucknow; Dr. Nidhi Yadav is the Junior Resident (Obst. & Gynae) at the Era’s Lucknow Medical College, Lucknow; Dr. Uma Gupta is the Professor (Obst. & Gynae) at the Mayo Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, and Ex-Professor (Obst. & Gynae) in the Era’s Lucknow Medical College, Lucknow

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sinha, P., Yadav, N. & Gupta, U. Use of Hysteroscopy in Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: An Edge Over Histopathological Examination. J Obstet Gynecol India 68, 45–50 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-017-1065-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-017-1065-5

Keywords

Navigation