Advertisement

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India

, Volume 67, Issue 6, pp 393–399 | Cite as

Down Syndrome Screening in India: Are We There Yet?

  • K. Manikandan
  • Suresh Seshadri
Invited Review Article

Abstract

Down syndrome is the most common cause of intellectual disability among live born children and is amenable to prenatal detection. Screening for Down syndrome on a population basis requires a thorough understanding of the principles involved in the screening tests. We discuss the rationale behind the commonly available screening tests and the Indian scenario in this setting.

Keywords

Down syndrome Prenatal screening Combined screening test Quadruple screening test Indian scenario 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

SS is Honorary Clinical Director of PerkinElmer Laboratory, Chennai. KM declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animals Rights

The authors declare that no human research participants or animals were involved in composing this invited review article.

Informed Consent

The authors declare that informed consent was not required for this invited review article as no human research participants were involved.

References

  1. 1.
    Wilson JMG, Gunnar J. Principles and practice of screening for disease [Internet]. World Health Organisation. 1968 [cited 2017 May 31]. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/37650/17/WHO_PHP_34.pdf.
  2. 2.
    Langdon J, Down H. Observations on an ethnic classification of idiots1. Heredity. 1966;21(4):695–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    On the antiquity of trisomy 21: moving towards a quantitative diagnosis of down syndrome in historic material culture [Internet]. [cited 2017 Feb 21]. http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/70399984/antiquity-trisomy-21-moving-towards-quantitative-diagnosis-down-syndrome-historic-material-culture.
  4. 4.
    Valenti C, Schutta EJ, Kehaty T. Prenatal diagnosis of Down’s syndrome. Lancet Lond Engl. 1968;2(7561):220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nadler HL. Antenatal detection of hereditary disorders. Pediatrics. 1968;42(6):912–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gertner M, Hsu LY, Martin J, et al. The use of amniocentesis for prenatal genetic counseling. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1970;46(11):916–21.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nicolaides K. Fetal medicine [Internet]. Abu Dhabi first international conference in fetal medicine, pediatrics, pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition. 2015 [cited 2017 Mar 22]; Abu Dhabi. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=t8CKcModb58.
  8. 8.
    Penrose LS. The relative effects of paternal and maternal age in mongolism. 1933. J Genet. 2009;88(1):9–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nicolaides KH. Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities: need to change the rules. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1994;4(5):353–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hook EB, Lindsjö A. Down syndrome in live births by single year maternal age interval in a Swedish study: comparison with results from a New York State study. Am J Hum Genet. 1978;30(1):19–27.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tabor A, Madsen M, Obel E, et al. Randomised controlled trial of genetic amniocentesis in 4606 low-risk women. Lancet. 1986;327(8493):1287–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Akolekar R, Beta J, Picciarelli G, et al. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(1):16–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wulff CB, Gerds TA, Rode L, et al. Risk of fetal loss associated with invasive testing following combined first-trimester screening for Down syndrome: a national cohort of 147 987 singleton pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(1):38–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rutter S. Down’s syndrome | intellectual disability and health [Internet]. [cited 2017 May 28]. http://www.intellectualdisability.info/diagnosis/articles/downs-syndrome.
  15. 15.
    Snijders RJ, Sundberg K, Holzgreve W, et al. Maternal age- and gestation-specific risk for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;13(3):167–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Manikandan K, Suresh S, Seshadri S. Basic biostatistical concepts for the fetal physician—I: the 2 × 2 table and Its derivatives. J Fetal Med. 2016;3(4):151–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reimand T, Ounap K, Zordania R, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of Down’s syndrome in Estonia. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006;20(6):512–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brajenović-Milić B, Prpić I, Petrović O, et al. The prevalence of live birth Down syndrome in the region of Primorsko-goranska County in Croatia, 1996–2005: the impact of screening and amniocentesis. Matern Child Health J. 2008;12(5):620–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wortelboer MJ, De Wolf BT, Verschuuren-Bemelmans CC, et al. Trends in live birth prevalence of down syndrome in the Northern Netherlands 1987-96: the impact of screening and prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 2000;20(9):709–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jou H-J, Kuo Y-S, Hsu J-J, et al. The evolving national birth prevalence of Down syndrome in Taiwan. A study on the impact of second-trimester maternal serum screening. Prenat Diagn. 2005;25(8):665–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harlap S. Down’s syndrome in West Jerusalem. Am J Epidemiol. 1973;97(4):225–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Khalil A, Pandya P. Screening for Down syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2006;56(3):205–11.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wald NJ, Rodeck C, Hackshaw AK, et al. SURUSS in perspective. Semin Perinatol. 2005;29(4):225–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mastana SS. Unity in diversity: an overview of the genomic anthropology of India. Ann Hum Biol. 2014;41(4):287–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Modi UJ, Nayak U, Aiyer S, Bharani S, Master DC, Shah T, et al. Study of malformations and Down syndrome in India (SOMDI): Baroda region. Httpwwwijhgcomarticleaspissn0971-6866year1998volume4issue1spage93epage98aulastModitype2 [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2017 Jun 5]. http://imsear.hellis.org/handle/123456789/159843.
  26. 26.
    Bharucha BA. Study of malformations and Down syndrome in India (SOMDI): Bombay region. Httpwwwijhgcomarticleaspissn0971-6866year1998volume4issue1spage88epage92aulastBharuchatype2 [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2017 Jun 6]. http://imsear.hellis.org/handle/123456789/159842.
  27. 27.
    Verma IC, Anand NK, Kabra M, et al. Study of malformations and Down syndrome in India (SOMDI): Delhi region. Indian J Hum Genet. 1998;4(1):84–7.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lakhan R, Kishore MT. Down syndrome in tribal population in India: a field observation. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2016;7(1):40–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jyothy A, Kumar KS, Rao GN, et al. Cytogenetic studies of 1001 Down syndrome cases from Andhra Pradesh, India. Indian J Med Res. 2000;111:133–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thomas IM, Rajangam S, Hegde S. Cytogenetic investigations in Down syndrome patients & their parents. Indian J Med Res. 1992;96:366–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Isaac GS, Krishnamurty PS, Reddy YR, et al. Down’s syndrome in Hyderabad, India. Acta Anthropog. 1985;9(4):256–60.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mandava S, Koppaka N, Bhatia V, et al. Cytogenetic analysis of 1572 cases of Down syndrome: a report of double aneuploidy and novel findings 47, XY, t (14; 21) (q13; q22.3) mat, + 21 and 45, XX, t (14;21) in an Indian population. Genet Test Mol Biomark. 2010;14(4):499–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sheth F, Rao S, Desai M, et al. Cytogenetic analysis of Down syndrome in Gujarat. Indian Pediatr. 2007;44(10):774–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rao VB. Mean maternal age of Down’s syndrome in Hyderabad, India. J Indian Med Assoc. 1999;97:25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vundinti BR, Ghosh K. Incidence of down syndrome: Hypotheses and reality. Indian J Hum Genet. 2011;17(3):117–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Malini SS, Ramachandra NB. Influence of advanced age of maternal grandmothers on Down syndrome. BMC Med Genet. 2006;7(1):4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kaur G, Srivastav J, Kaur A, et al. Maternal serum second trimester screening for chromosomal disorders and neural tube defects in a government hospital of North India. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(12):1192–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Manikandan K, Rangaraj A, Ganesan P, et al. The first trimester combined screening test in the Indian population: insights from a cohort of 27,647 pregnancies. J Fetal Med [Internet]. 2017. doi: 10.1007/s40556-017-0127-1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Fetal MedicineMediscan SystemsChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Fetal Care Research FoundationChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations